Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Teknisia
hariadi yuliantoo
UNIVERSITAS ISLAM INDONESIA
Engineering

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
PERBANDINGAN METODE ANALISIS KAPASITAS LENTUR DAN FAKTOR REDUKSI PELAT COMBIDECK TERHADAP UJI LABORATORIUM hariadi yuliantoo
TEKNISIA Vol. XXIII, No. 2, November 2018
Publisher : Jurusan Teknik Sipil, Fakultas Teknik Sipil dan Perencanaan, Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Combideck slab was a floor slab that used a steeldeck as positive reinforcement and as formwork that hold the flooring concrete cast. While combined with wiremesh as negative reinforcement, the combideck system even more efficient than half slab casting method for concrete flooring system (Siregar, 2010). However, there is no standard method in Indonesia to analyze the flexure capacity of combideck. This study compared 3-analysis method (ultimate, working stress and SDI-ANSI) to laboratory test result that already done by Kadir&Sudarmadi (2008). Based on the published data, this study analyzed the combideck section properties to determine the theoretical flexure capacity, than it compared to the test result for validation. Besides that, this study also evaluated the reduction factor from the all 3 method to laboratory test result. This study validated that the working stress and SDI-ANSI method were accurate to analyze the slip flexure capacity, but the ultimate method was accurate for maximum flexure capacity. Because of the theoretical capacity form all 3 method was slightly greater than the test result (SDI-ANSI= 5.79%, working stress= 4.83%, ultimate method = 5.72%), the reduction factor from this study resulted as =0.76.
STUDI ANALISIS KAPASITAS NOMINAL PELAT KOMPOSIT BETON-DEK BAJA METODE ULTIMIT, TEGANGAN KERJA DAN SDI-ANSI 2017 Hariadi Yulianto
TEKNISIA Vol. XXVI, No. 1, Mei 2021
Publisher : Jurusan Teknik Sipil, Fakultas Teknik Sipil dan Perencanaan, Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/teknisia.vol26.iss1.art1

Abstract

Today, the most efficient slab construction method is the concrete-steel deck composite slab because there is no need to remove the deck after the concrete casting process. Nevertheless, reinforced concrete standard code (SNI 2847:2019) not emphasized a specific method to calculate the concrete-steel deck slab's nominal capacity. The code is embraced by the plastic method analysis, which is calculated the nominal capacity of the structure on the ultimate condition. However, several laboratory tests reveal a slip behavior between the concrete and steel deck before the slab reaches its ultimate condition. Therefore, alternative methods are needed to analyze the nominal capacity of concrete-steel deck slab. This study compares three different nominal capacity analysis methods to a laboratory test result. Those methods are ultimate, working stress, and SDI-ANSI (2017). The average error value of those three methods compared to laboratory test results in 35,57%, 9,48%, and -10,31% for ultimate, working stress, SDI-ANSI (2017) consecutively.it can be concluded the working stress method is the most accurate. However, SDI-ANSI (2017) is the conservative one, while the ultimate method is not recommended to analyze the concrete-steel deck slab's nominal capacity.
Co-Authors