Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL KOLABORASI Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu dan Praktek Administrasi Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu dan Praktek Administrasi
Arief Maulana
1) Master of Public Administration, Sriwijaya University 2) Center for Regional and Budgetary Studies, The House of Regional Representative of the Republic of Indonesia
Humanities Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
An Implementation Review of The Program of Complete Systematic Land Registration In Indonesia Arief Maulana; Chumanidya Utami; Yana Suryana
Kolaborasi : Jurnal Administrasi Publik Vol 8, No 1 (2022): April 2022
Publisher : Department of Public Administration, Muhammadiyah University of Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26618/kjap.v8i1.7184

Abstract

Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) is the process of registering land for the first time, which is carried out simultaneously and includes all objects of land registration that have not been registered in an area. Through this program, the government guarantees legal certainty or rights to land owned by the community. However, the importance of land registration in Indonesia has not been followed by a good understanding by the community. Many lands in Indonesia that have not been certified are due to various factors that prevent communities from registering ownership rights to their land. This study aims to describe the implementation of the PTSL program and analyze the program related to its role in resolving land disputes in Indonesia. This study is qualitative research and used an interpretive paradigm. Data collection techniques were carried out through literature studies and focus group discussions. The results showed that PTSL is not a form of agrarian reform at the implementation level. The PTSL program still has things that have the potential to become problems in the future, including the implementation of PTSL is still fertile with the practice of extortion, potential claims on land after certification are still often occurred, and the non-functioning of the publicity and delimitation contradictory principle has resulted in many land conflicts/disputes.
The Progress of Regional Autonomy Policy and Development Attainments: Indonesia's Experience (1999-2021) Arief Maulana; Chumanidya Utami; Lukman Ikbal Hanafi
Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu dan Praktek Administrasi Vol 19, No 1 (2022): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi Lembaga Administrasi Negara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31113/jia.v19i1.857

Abstract

When regional autonomy was implemented in 1999, many questioned whether there would automatically be a fundamental and structural paradigm shift. By critically examining various dimensions of regional development problems in the era of decentralization, the main objective of this study is to analyze development achievements in Indonesia during the implementation of regional autonomy policies (1999-2021). This study uses a qualitative method with a descriptive-analytical approach. The results of this study can be viewed from the four dimensions of decentralization: Political, Administrative, Fiscal, and Economic. Regional autonomy has encouraged a democratic culture amid people's lives from the political dimension. However, the biggest problem in political development is the weak performance of democratic institutions such as parliaments and political parties. From the dimension of government administration, there is a shift from vertical to horizontal accountability, where information and accountability are not given in one direction vertically but also to the people. From the fiscal dimension, regions have not fully optimized regional original revenue and regional economic potential. Fiscal decentralization has not yet had an optimal impact on development in the education, health, and social service sectors. From the economic dimension, there are still very few regions that are serious about using the potential of their natural resources and human resources to increase the competitiveness of their regions in the context of economic development.
The Progress of Regional Autonomy Policy and Development Attainments: Indonesia's Experience (1999-2021) Arief Maulana; Chumanidya Utami; Lukman Ikbal Hanafi
Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu dan Praktek Administrasi Vol. 19 No. 1 (2022): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi Lembaga Administrasi Negara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31113/jia.v19i1.857

Abstract

When regional autonomy was implemented in 1999, many questioned whether there would automatically be a fundamental and structural paradigm shift. By critically examining various dimensions of regional development problems in the era of decentralization, the main objective of this study is to analyze development achievements in Indonesia during the implementation of regional autonomy policies (1999-2021). This study uses a qualitative method with a descriptive-analytical approach. The results of this study can be viewed from the four dimensions of decentralization: Political, Administrative, Fiscal, and Economic. Regional autonomy has encouraged a democratic culture amid people's lives from the political dimension. However, the biggest problem in political development is the weak performance of democratic institutions such as parliaments and political parties. From the dimension of government administration, there is a shift from vertical to horizontal accountability, where information and accountability are not given in one direction vertically but also to the people. From the fiscal dimension, regions have not fully optimized regional original revenue and regional economic potential. Fiscal decentralization has not yet had an optimal impact on development in the education, health, and social service sectors. From the economic dimension, there are still very few regions that are serious about using the potential of their natural resources and human resources to increase the competitiveness of their regions in the context of economic development.
Co-Authors Chumanidya Utami Lukman Ikbal Hanafi Yana Suryana