Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Rechtsidee Khairun Law Journal KHAIRUN LAW JOURNAL
Sekar Langit Jatu Pamungkas
Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Law on Asset Recovery for Corruption in Indonesia: An Urgent Need Sekar Langit Jatu Pamungkas; Kuswardani
Rechtsidee Vol 9 (2021): December
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/jihr.v9i0.762

Abstract

Corruption is an organized crime, so that its existence is required to complete the law not only for the perpetrators but also for the results of acts of corruption which are often not found with a track record of all assets of corruption. This study aims to examine legal products in Indonesia regarding the seizure of assets resulting from criminal acts of corruption. Philosophically, the existence of criminal acts of corruption is a form of state responsibility to eradicate because there is not yet a strong legal basis to regulate the mechanism of confiscation effectively in the enforcement of corruption. This research method uses normative juridical with conceptual legal approach with qualitative descriptive research type. The results of this study can be concluded that the urgency of the establishment of the Draft Law on the confiscation of assets resulting from acts of corruption is to change the legal paradigm in law enforcement of criminal acts of corruption which is not only focused on perpetrators of corruption but assets resulting from criminal acts of corruption can be returned based on the amount of losses suffered by the perpetrators of corruption. country. The effectiveness of the law with the formation of these legal products closes the gaps that have so far arisen so that it triggers the existence of criminal acts of corruption.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MOU HELSINKI ON CRIMINAL LAW POLICY IN NANGGROE ACEH DARUSSALAM (NAD) Sekar Langit Jatu Pamungkas; Denmark Erlangga Putra; Valiantnuja Washfaa Yunandeva; Akbar Fahrudin Malik; Nur Faishal Luqman
Khairun Law Journal Vol 5, No 2 (2022): Maret 2022
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Khairun University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33387/klj.v5i2.5437

Abstract

Aceh, as one of the autonomous regions in the context of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia, in the practice of implementing Local Government, repeatedly not only positions the type and hierarchy of laws and regulations following Law No. 12 of 2011 on the Establishment of Laws and Regulations but also positions the Helsinki MoU as one of the legal sources. The thing that is the practice in this writing is related to how the implementation of the Helsinki MoU in criminal law policy in Aceh. Research methods are conducted with normative legal research methods and prescriptive research. Data collection in this study is done through literature research. Data analysis is done with qualitative analysis; the process of data analysis and using legal data is also possible to use non-legal data. This study showed that after the MoU of peace between the Indonesian government and GAM was marked on August 15, 2005, in Helsinki, Finland, 24 governments then passed Law No. 11 of 2006 on the aceh government. This law is a political commitment of the Indonesian government in following up on the results of the peace agreement in Helsinki. One of the authorities (autonomy/self-government) granted in the law is to implement Islamic sharia in Aceh in a kaffah both in terms of worship, education, muamalat, shiar, civil law, and criminal law. While implementing the Helsinki MoU is, the regulation related to Jinayat (Criminal Law) has strengthened. Other judicial institutions are also concerned about implementing criminal law in Aceh, although the rules about Criminal Law still cause debate.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MOU HELSINKI ON CRIMINAL LAW POLICY IN NANGGROE ACEH DARUSSALAM (NAD) Sekar Langit Jatu Pamungkas; Denmark Erlangga Putra; Valiantnuja Washfaa Yunandeva; Akbar Fahrudin Malik; Nur Faishal Luqman
Khairun Law Journal Volume 5 Issue 2, March 2022
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Khairun University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33387/klj.v5i2.5437

Abstract

Aceh, as one of the autonomous regions in the context of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia, in the practice of implementing Local Government, repeatedly not only positions the type and hierarchy of laws and regulations following Law No. 12 of 2011 on the Establishment of Laws and Regulations but also positions the Helsinki MoU as one of the legal sources. The thing that is the practice in this writing is related to how the implementation of the Helsinki MoU in criminal law policy in Aceh. Research methods are conducted with normative legal research methods and prescriptive research. Data collection in this study is done through literature research. Data analysis is done with qualitative analysis; the process of data analysis and using legal data is also possible to use non-legal data. This study showed that after the MoU of peace between the Indonesian government and GAM was marked on August 15, 2005, in Helsinki, Finland, 24 governments then passed Law No. 11 of 2006 on the aceh government. This law is a political commitment of the Indonesian government in following up on the results of the peace agreement in Helsinki. One of the authorities (autonomy/self-government) granted in the law is to implement Islamic sharia in Aceh in a kaffah both in terms of worship, education, muamalat, shiar, civil law, and criminal law. While implementing the Helsinki MoU is, the regulation related to Jinayat (Criminal Law) has strengthened. Other judicial institutions are also concerned about implementing criminal law in Aceh, although the rules about Criminal Law still cause debate.
Co-Authors Akbar Fahrudin Malik Denmark Erlangga Putra Kuswardani Nur Faishal Luqman Valiantnuja Washfaa Yunandeva