Duwi Hariono
STAIN Kediri

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PEMAHAMAN ḤADITH (Definisi, Aliran, dan Afilisasi) Duwi Hariono
UNIVERSUM : Jurnal KeIslaman dan Kebudayaan Vol 11, No 1 (2017)
Publisher : IAIN Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30762/universum.v11i1.591

Abstract

The terms in hadith study is often ambiguous and difficult to differentiate. As the terms of hadith, sunah, khabar, and atsar are often used at the same time. For hadith observers, it becomes serious problem and complicated since those terms have significant difference. Hence, the same usage of those terms cannot be accepted. One of the debatable issues in discussing hadith study is about disagreement in defining the term of hadith understanding. The hadith scholars mention it in three terms: fiqh al-ḥadith, fahm al-ḥadith dan naqd al-ḥadith. Each term has different perception related to its scope and limitation. One should be underlined that although those terms are different, the purposes are same namely hadith understanding activities. This article discusses the definition of fiqh al-ḥadith, fahm al-ḥadith dan naqd al-ḥadith and their sects and affiliation of hadith understanding. Keywords: Fiqh al-ḥadith, fahm al-ḥadith, naqd al-ḥadith, sects, affiliation
PEMAHAMAN ḤADITH (Definisi, Aliran, dan Afilisasi) Duwi Hariono
UNIVERSUM: Jurnal Keislaman dan Kebudayaan Vol. 11 No. 01 (2017): Januari 2017
Publisher : LPPM IAIN Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30762/universum.v11i01.728

Abstract

Istilah-istilah atau term dalam ilmu ḥadith seringkali rancu dan sulit dibedakan. Sebagaimana istilah ḥadith, sunah, khabar, dan atsar yang seringkali disamakan. Bagi pemerhati ḥadith hal tersebut menjadi persoalan yang serius dan rumit mengingat masing-masing istilah tersebut memiliki signifikansi yang jelas berbeda sehingga penyamaan maksud istilah-istilah tersebut tidak dapat diterima. Salah satu persoalan yang terus meramaikan diskursus ilmu ḥadith hingga dewasa ini adalah belum tercapainya kesepakatan dalam hal mendefinisikan istilah pemahaman ḥadith. Para tokoh ḥadith menyebutnya dalam tiga terma; fiqh al-ḥadith, fahm al-ḥadith dan naqd al-ḥadith. Masingmasing memiliki persepsi yang berbeda terkait dengan ruang lingkup dan arah kegiatannya. Satu hal yang patut digarisbawahi yakni meskipun semua istilah yang disebutkan diatas berbeda namun tujuannya sama yakni kegiatan memahami ḥadith. Artikel ini akan membahas definisi dari fiqh alḥadith, fahm al-ḥadith dan naqd al ḥadith serta aliran-aliran dan afiliasi pemahaman ḥadith.