Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Dinamika Politik Politeia: Jurnal Ilmu Politik
Anwar Saragih
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Peran Militer dalam Pemerintahan Fasisme Jerman Anwar Saragih
Dinamika Politik Vol 1, No 01 (2012): Dinamika Politik
Publisher : Dinamika Politik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (110.64 KB)

Abstract

This study is a study of the role of the military in the government of German fascism. The focus discusses the role of the military in government fascist Germany in the leadership of Adolf Hitler. The findings of this study, there are four important things about the military's role in the government of German fascism: First, civilian control over the military; Second, conflict management in Germany; Third, the concept and strategy of national development; Fourth, lebensraum or power expansion. The method used is descriptive method, which describes an incident in more detail.Keywords: Fascism, militarism, power.
Ilusi Demokrasi Substansial di Indonesia: Sebuah Kritik Terhadap Impementasi Parliamentary Treshlod Anwar Saragih
Politeia: Jurnal Ilmu Politik Vol 10, No 2 (2018): VOLUME 10 NO 2 JULI 2018
Publisher : Universitas Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (652.652 KB)

Abstract

This study raises a discussion about the Illusion of Substantial Democracy in Indonesia: A Criticism of the Implementation of Theshold's Parliamentary. Since the 2009 general election. Indonesia has begun to introduce a parliamentary threshold system (Parliamentary Theshold) which sets a 2.5% threshold. Then in the next election, the 2014 election rose to 3.5% in the spirit of simplifying the number of parties in parliament. However, in fact this did not happen. Because, the number of political parties resulting from the 2009 elections which were 9 parties actually increased to 10 parties in the 2014 election. There were other problems in the electoral system using Theshold Parliamentary. As in the 2009 elections there were 29 political parties whose voices were lost due to this system, then in the 2014 elections there were 2 political parties who also lost votes due to the threshold system. Of course, as a democracy the people must know where the voice is. Is the system of implementing the Theshold Parliamentary system in the Indonesian elections in line with the essence of substantial democracy? The results of this study indicate the parliamentary threshold system has an impact on the loss of the voice of small parties, transactional presidential elections and the parliamentary threshold limiting democratic rights. Indonesia needs an electoral system that is honest, free, high-quality, transparent and represents the wishes of the majority of Indonesia's ractates  
Co-Authors