Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal LAW REVIEW Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Hessa Arteja
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP HAK-HAK ANAK ATAS PENDIDIKAN PADA MASA PANDEMI COVID-19 [The Legal Protection of Children's Right to Education during the Covid-19 Pandemic] Cynthia Phillo; Hessa Arteja; M Faiz Rizqi
Law Review Volume XX, No. 3 - March 2021
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pelita Harapan | Lippo Karawaci, Tangerang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lr.v0i0.2735

Abstract

Children as the forerunners of the successor to the future Indonesia nation make children individuals who become priorities in holding the right to education. The law itself has governed the rights that a child must have, including the right to get a proper education. Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic, the government finds it difficult in providing legal protection for a proper education rights of children. By using normative legal method, this paper will explain how the legal protection of children’s rights  over education during the COVID-19 Pandemic that’s happening and how the government’s role is in fulfilling childern’s rights in getitng an education.Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak: Anak sebagai cikal bakal penerus bangsa Indonesia menjadikan anak sebagai individu yang menjadi prioritas dalam memegang hak pendidikan. Undang-undang sendiri telah mengatur tentang hak-hak yang harus diteirma oleh anak, termasuk hak dalam pendidikan. Karena Pandemi COVID-19 yang terjadi, menambah kesulitan bagi pemerintah untuk memberikan perilundungan hukum bagi hak anak atas pendidikan. Dengan menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif, tulisan ini akan menjelaskan bagaimana perlindungan hukum hak anak atas pendidikan pada masa Pandemi COVID-19 yang sedang tejadi dan bagaimana peran negara dalam memenuhi hak anak dalam mendapat pendidikan.
ANALISIS PENGAWASAN PENYELENGGARA PERDAGANGAN MELALUI SISTEM ELEKTRONIK (PPMSE) DALAM MENGAWASI FENOMENA BARANG PALSU DI PLATFORM MARKETPLACE (STUDI PERBANDINGAN DI INDONESIA DAN AMERIKA SERIKAT) Hessa Arteja; Christine S.T. Kansil
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 3, No 2 (2020): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v3i2.10591

Abstract

The United States and Indonesia each have recognized the so-called marketplace platform. Marketplace platform is a place where sellers and buyers as consumers for platform providers or PPMSE can make buying and selling transactions online. The marketplace platform is also easily accessible anywhere by the public, therefore many counterfeit goods are sold on the marketplace platform, so that supervision is needed from PPMSE or platform providers as people or business entities that provide and facilitate electronic buying and selling transactions. To answer these problems, the author uses normative legal research methods. Based on the research results, if there are counterfeit goods on the marketplace platform, PPMSE in Indonesia and the United States are not responsible if there are counterfeit goods on the marketplace platform if the platform provider or PPMSE is not the party selling the counterfeit goods and PPMSE or the platform provider has taken the appropriate steps established legal rules. Then the equation of the legal rules regarding platform providers in Indonesia and the United States is that the platform providers both do not monitor and are not responsible for the list of goods sold on the marketplace platform on a regular basis. The difference is that in the Indonesian law regarding PMSE, the cooperative attitude of PPMSE is not regulated if there is a complaint or lawsuit from the owner of the rights, whereas in the United States law, it regulates how PPMSE should behave when the owner of the right to file a subpoena from the court against the platform provider regarding the sale of goods fake on the marketplace platform.
Co-Authors Christine S.T. Kansil Cynthia Phillo M Faiz Rizqi