Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal KARSA: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Keislaman (Journal of Social and Islamic Culture)
Moch Tolchah
Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Sunan Ampel Surabaya
Religion Arts Humanities Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
TEOLOGI BENCANA KAUM PESANTREN Moch Tolchah
Karsa: Journal of Social and Islamic Culture Vol. 23 No. 2 (2015): ISLAM, BUDAYA, DAN PESANTREN
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19105/karsa.v23i2.729

Abstract

The construction of theological thought of Islamic scholars about disaster in East Java is based on the dialogue process which is based on the text (the doctrine of theology) and context (a variety of catastrophic events). The scholar thought dia-lectically involves three momentums at once, the moment of internalization, ex-ternalization, and objectification. This cycle can be seen from the understanding of the resource person which is based on the doctrine of theology and catas-trophic events. The dialectics of text and context eventually lead to the concerns of the scholars. This study concludes that in the view of the primary sources, the disaster is interpreted in three categories, namely as mushîbah (trials), imtihân (warning/test), and 'adzab (torture) of God as prime cause for humanity in hablun min Allah (relationship/worship with Allah), hablun min al al-nâs (relation-ship/interact with human), and hablun min al-'âlam (relationship/maintain with universe). Generally, this theological view can not be separated from mainstream theology, the theology of the Ash'arite which is the mainstream ideology of Ahlussunnah wal Jama'ah followers. Polarization of views and interpretations of the Islamic scholars in East Java in Berger’s constructivism theory gives rise typology of scholar thought; conservative, moderate and progressive thought.Copyright (c) 2015 by KARSA. All right reservedDOI: 10.19105/karsa.v23i2.729
Co-Authors