Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum
I Gusti Ngurah Adnyana
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Merdeka Malang Jl. Terusan Raya Dieng No. 62-64 Malang
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
PENJATUHAN SANKSI DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERSELISIHAN HUBUNGAN INDUSTRIAL I Gusti Ngurah Adnyana
Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum Vol 19, No 1 (2014): June 2014
Publisher : University of Merdeka Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26905/idjch.v19i1.1128

Abstract

Manpower law was mixed. It meant that it consisted of civil law aspect, and public law aspect, so the lawbreaker would get civil sanction, criminal sanction, and administrative one. The solution of industrial relationdisagreementas regulated in regulation no 2 year 2004 did not regulate the solution of industrial relationdisagreement which happened because of violation to manpower law which was pubic. The stipulation inregulation no 2 year 2004 merely regulated disagreement solution as what written in civil law, either out ofcourt or through industrial relation court by submitting suit
PEMBUKTIAN DALAM PERKARA PERCERAIAN DENGAN ALASAN PERSELISIHAN I Gusti Ngurah Adnyana
Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum Vol 18, No 2 (2013): Desember 2013
Publisher : University of Merdeka Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26905/idjch.v18i2.1119

Abstract

Civil Law was public law which was imperative so it tied everyone, especially in investigating witness incourt. It was determined that judge forbade to get witness from blood relative as the base to take decision.However it was not an absolute regulation. It meant that the rule of forbidding to investigate witness fromfamily side would not be in valid when a judge investigated witness in divorce case with continuous conflicts.Witness from family tended not too objective but a judge gave a priority on formal truth without testingmaterially. In fact in taking decision, a judge considered the regulation text more than the explanation fromwitness.
Co-Authors