Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Kebijakan dan Pelayanan Publik Legal Spirit
Imam Sumantri
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
ANALISIS IMPLEMENTASI PERATURAN PEMERINTAH NOMOR 39 TAHUN 2018 TENTANG KEPROTOKOLAN PADA BAGIAN PROTOKOL DAN KOMUNIKASI PIMPINAN SEKRETARIAT DAERAH KABUPATEN LAMPUNG BARAT Asmaria Asmaria; M. Fikri Akbar; Imam Sumantri
e-JKPP Vol 6, No 3 (2020): DESEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Bandar Lampung (UBL)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36448/ejkpp.v6i3.1926

Abstract

The implementation of Government Regulation Number 39 Year 2018 regarding Protocols in the Protocol and Communication Section of Leaders is still not going well, this is because there are still many protocol staff who do not understand the rules of the Protocol itself and are still based on existing customs. That can be an obstacle in the service of protocol in the Protocol and Communication Section of the Head of the Regional Secretariat of West Lampung Regency. The research approach uses a qualitative descriptive approach. The results showed that the implementation of Government Regulation Number 39 Year 2018 on Protocol in the Protocol and Communication Section of the Head of the Regional Secretariat of West Lampung Regency was still not going well because of the inhibiting factors, namely inadequate Human Resources  in the field of protocols as well as facilities and infrastructure tasks. protocol that has not yet fulfilled capacity.
TINJAUAN HUKUM TERHADAP PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 88/PUU-XIV/2016 Imam Sumantri
Legal Spirit Vol 3, No 2 (2019): Legal Spirit
Publisher : Pascasarjana Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Widyagama Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31328/ls.v3i2.1474

Abstract

Yogyakarta, pinned to the Special Region because it has its own historical factors from other regions, so that Yogyakarta has specificities that are given the law through Law No. 13 of 2012 concerning Yogyakarta Regional Privileges. On his journey there seemed to be a problem, with the Sultan currently not having a son. This study discusses: First, What is the ratio decidendi (judge's consideration) of the Constitutional Court Decision 88 / PUU-XIV / 2016 in interpreting article 18B of the 1945 Constitution? Second, how is the examination of the Constitutional Court Decision 88 / PUU-XIV / 2016, and the reformulation of regulations. This research uses normative legal research, the method of approach used is the statutory regulation, conceptual approach, historical approach and philosophy. The results of the study show that, first, there is no definite benchmark by the Constitutional Court in interpreting Article 18B of the 1945 Law concerning asymenteric decentralization. Thus, this makes the Constitutional Court Decision 88 / PUU-XIV / 2016, in its consideration, inconsistencies occur. Second, the examination of the verdict, more specifically on the legal standing, where the loss is not felt by the applicant. In the future reformulation, the state does not need to intervene in the internal affairs of the palace, either through court rulings or legislative regulations.Key words: Legal Review, MK Decision, Special Region of Yogyakarta, Asimeteris Decentralization
Co-Authors Asmaria Asmaria M. Fikri Akbar