Adriana M Lubis
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

Animal Biotechnology and Cultural Ecology Suradisastra, Kedi; Lubis, Adriana M
Indonesian Bulletin of Animal and Veterinary Sciences Vol 10, No 2 (2000)
Publisher : Indonesian Animal Sciences Society

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (200.726 KB) | DOI: 10.14334/wartazoa.v10i2.741

Abstract

Animal biotechnology development is strongly related to historical contexts of animal production in a country and the receiving environment, particularly the existing cultural ecology. Cultural ecology influences both progress and process of adoption of such technology. A simulation on the technology’s discriminating power indicates that only those with sufficient techno-economic and social capability have greater possibility to adopt such a technology.   Key words: Biotechnology, cultural ecology, adoption
The Use of Reproductive Biotechnology to Achieve Genetic Improvement in Cattle Lubis, Adriana M
Indonesian Bulletin of Animal and Veterinary Sciences Vol 10, No 1 (2000)
Publisher : Indonesian Animal Sciences Society

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (151.933 KB) | DOI: 10.14334/wartazoa.v10i1.745

Abstract

Reproductive biotechnology has many potential uses. It can be used to increase the rate of genetic improvement, but they have the potential to cause an even greater increase in the rate of inbreeding. Determining how to gain genetic advantage from these technologies, while at the same time minimizing their genetic disadvantage, has provided a major challenge for geneticists. Multiple ovulation and embryo transfer (MOET), in vitro embryo production (IVEP) only produce substantial increases in the rate of genetic improvement, with acceptable rates of inbreeding. In contrast, semen sexing, embryo sexing reduces the numbers of the other sex, the effect is negligible and only will have a marginal effect on the rate of improvement. They can produce only limited increase of the rate of genetic improvement. There will be great interdependence between the techniques, the way in which the use of a new technique will depend upon which of the other procedures are available. There is a need for research not only to  establish the techniques, but also to  consider the best use of them in  animal breeding and production schemes. Nevertheless, the ethicist might play an important role as a guide in moral decision making and training for a morally responsible attitude. The aim of this paper is to review the ways in which these technologies can be used to increase genetic improvement in cattle.  Key words : MOET, IVEP, semen sexing, embryo sexing
Gender Aspects in Animal Production Suradisastra, Kedi; Lubis, Adriana M
Indonesian Bulletin of Animal and Veterinary Sciences Vol 10, No 1 (2000)
Publisher : Indonesian Animal Sciences Society

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (212.125 KB) | DOI: 10.14334/wartazoa.v10i1.747

Abstract

Research on women’s role in animal production are often entangled in physical participation although their problems in agriculture include labor force participation and equilibrium, authority in the household, socialization process and access to information, and technological bias. Socially, the limiting factors in their productivity are social status, job opportunity and status, and their simultan role as compared to men’s sequential role.   Key words : Role, gender, livestock
Gender Aspects in Animal Production Kedi Suradisastra; Adriana M Lubis
WARTAZOA, Indonesian Bulletin of Animal and Veterinary Sciences Vol 10, No 1 (2000)
Publisher : Indonesian Center for Animal Research and Development

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (212.125 KB) | DOI: 10.14334/wartazoa.v10i1.747

Abstract

Research on women’s role in animal production are often entangled in physical participation although their problems in agriculture include labor force participation and equilibrium, authority in the household, socialization process and access to information, and technological bias. Socially, the limiting factors in their productivity are social status, job opportunity and status, and their simultan role as compared to men’s sequential role.   Key words : Role, gender, livestock
The Use of Reproductive Biotechnology to Achieve Genetic Improvement in Cattle Adriana M Lubis
WARTAZOA, Indonesian Bulletin of Animal and Veterinary Sciences Vol 10, No 1 (2000)
Publisher : Indonesian Center for Animal Research and Development

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (151.933 KB) | DOI: 10.14334/wartazoa.v10i1.745

Abstract

Reproductive biotechnology has many potential uses. It can be used to increase the rate of genetic improvement, but they have the potential to cause an even greater increase in the rate of inbreeding. Determining how to gain genetic advantage from these technologies, while at the same time minimizing their genetic disadvantage, has provided a major challenge for geneticists. Multiple ovulation and embryo transfer (MOET), in vitro embryo production (IVEP) only produce substantial increases in the rate of genetic improvement, with acceptable rates of inbreeding. In contrast, semen sexing, embryo sexing reduces the numbers of the other sex, the effect is negligible and only will have a marginal effect on the rate of improvement. They can produce only limited increase of the rate of genetic improvement. There will be great interdependence between the techniques, the way in which the use of a new technique will depend upon which of the other procedures are available. There is a need for research not only to  establish the techniques, but also to  consider the best use of them in  animal breeding and production schemes. Nevertheless, the ethicist might play an important role as a guide in moral decision making and training for a morally responsible attitude. The aim of this paper is to review the ways in which these technologies can be used to increase genetic improvement in cattle.  Key words : MOET, IVEP, semen sexing, embryo sexing
Animal Biotechnology and Cultural Ecology Kedi Suradisastra; Adriana M Lubis
WARTAZOA, Indonesian Bulletin of Animal and Veterinary Sciences Vol 10, No 2 (2000)
Publisher : Indonesian Center for Animal Research and Development

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (200.726 KB) | DOI: 10.14334/wartazoa.v10i2.741

Abstract

Animal biotechnology development is strongly related to historical contexts of animal production in a country and the receiving environment, particularly the existing cultural ecology. Cultural ecology influences both progress and process of adoption of such technology. A simulation on the technology’s discriminating power indicates that only those with sufficient techno-economic and social capability have greater possibility to adopt such a technology.   Key words: Biotechnology, cultural ecology, adoption