Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Aceh International Journal of Social Science
Olorogun Lukman Ayinde
Unknown Affiliation
Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
The Substitution Dilemma In Islamic Finance: Contemporary Muslim Legal Thought on the use of Paper Money Olorogun Lukman Ayinde
Aceh International Journal of Social Science Volume 1 Number 2, December 2012
Publisher : Aceh International Journal of Social Science

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (569.397 KB) | DOI: 10.12345/aijss.1.2.1527

Abstract

Abstract - Gold and silver became the most widely accepted and circulated form of money in the medieval world. Even though paper money was introduced, state banks continued to store their equivalent in gold. In 1971 the US government abolished the Bretton Woods system and exchanged with the floating or fiat economy system which soon became the standard currency system worldwide. Many economies felt compelled to adopt the new US currency system because of the strength of the all-dominating American dollar and criticism was sparse. Disappointingly, no Muslim government produced legal rulings (fatwas) which rejected the legality of the fiat system and demanded the return to gold and silver backed currency. The single fatwa issued in Saudi Arabia in 1985 concluded that paper currency had completely replaced gold and silver and that all previous Islamic legal rulings issued on gold and silver were now applicable to paper currency. This paper study critically and evaluates the consequences of the Muslim intellectuals and Fiqh Academies‟ approval of substitution of gold and silver by banknotes on the Muslims and their nations.
A Critical Evaluation of The Compatibility Between Traditional And Contemporary Applications of Murabahah Transactions Olorogun Lukman Ayinde
Aceh International Journal of Social Science Volume 1 Number 1, June 2012
Publisher : Aceh International Journal of Social Science

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (358.384 KB) | DOI: 10.12345/aijss.1.1.1524

Abstract

Abstract - The present study explores the extent of conceptual resemblance between traditional and contemporary murabahah contracts. In order to assess the discrepancies, qualitative and quantitative content analyses are applied as research methodology. In particular, discrepancies of the conceptual basis of the two contracts are evaluated by content analysis through graphical presentation. The results of this study affirm that the critique raised against contemporary contracts is indeed justified. The comparative analysis of the conceptual differences between traditional and contemporary murabahah contracts leads to the conclusion that the contemporary murabahah contract is in inverse relation to the traditional murabahah contract.  
Co-Authors