Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik
Agus Sudibyo
Anggota Dewan Pers 2010-2013
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Masyarakat Warga dan Problem Keberadaban Agus Sudibyo
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Vol 14, No 1 (2010): JULI (Multikulturalisme dan Pergulatan Identitas)
Publisher : Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (694.84 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jsp.10947

Abstract

The emergence of civil society in Indonesia has always been located in a framework to deal with such a strong state hegemony. Civil society is located as the antithesis to the state. This article argues that civil society in Indonesia is also facing the threat of the existence of civil society itself, so uncivil society emerged as a threat to civil society that comes from civil society itself. In addition, a serious threat to civil society also emerged from the stronger market intervention.
Absennya Kajian Ekonomi Politik Media di Indonesia Agus Sudibyo
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Vol 4, No 2 (2000): NOVEMBER (Menggugat Kajian Media dan Kebebasan Pers)
Publisher : Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1430.832 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jsp.11116

Abstract

The rapid and deep changing of the media requires new approach in media studies in Indonesia. The cutently predominating positivism is inadequate. The article advocates the use of a critical political economy as an alternative approach to study media in Indonesia.
Wacana Penjarahan Dan Kekerasan Simbolik Terhadap Petani Agus Sudibyo
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Vol 2, No 3 (1999): MARET
Publisher : Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1254.651 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jsp.11150

Abstract

Perlawanan kaum petani sudah lama terjadi dalam konteks sejarah hubungan antara si kaya dan si miskin dan antara kaum petani dan negara. Persoralannya selalu bahwa negara, aparat keamanan dan pemilik modal telah mengambil alih secara paksa surplus ekonomi dari petani. Mereka bekerja sama dalam aksi penyerobotan tanah petani, pendirian perkebunan-perkebunan dan dalam menghadapi gerakan protes petani. Negara bukan hanya menghadapi gerakan perlawanan petani dengan represi-represi fisik. Secara sistematis negara juga melakukan propaganda dengan menciptakan gambaran-gambaran yang unfavourable tentang petani pelaku penjarahan dalam berbagai representasi wacana. Dalam batas tertentu, media massa justru memperkuat kecenderungan ini dengan menonjolkan dimensi kekerasan, pemberontakan dan anarkisme dalam mewacanakan aksi-aksi penjarahan petani.
De-Soekarnoisasi Dalam Wacana Resmi Orde Baru: Kilas-Balik Praktek-Praktek Rekayasa Kebenaran dan Wacana Sejarah Oleh Rejim Orde Baru Agus Sudibyo
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Vol 2, No 1 (1998): JULI
Publisher : Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (914.686 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jsp.11156

Abstract

New Order regime under Soeharto carried various ways out in order to weaken its rival's position. One of them is symbolical way, by using its formal discourses to create illegitimate and unfavourable construction on its rivals. This symbolical one is also applied to Bung Karno, the first President of Indonesia. Instead of less effectively legal-formal mechanisms to erode Bung Karno's influences, they delegitimated Bung Karno's in symbolical contex. This article looks that delegitimation practices to Bung Karno, or De-Soekarno-ization, is not only conducted on the level of manifest, for example by swept away Soekarno's loyalists fivm bureaucracy and military, but also on the level of symbolical-latent by negating and denying Bung Karno's historical roles and contributions. It occured in textual education books and government medias and on the various debate in mass media when apparatuses of New Order regime discreditted Bung Karno
Co-Authors