Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM
Rusli Muhammad
Universitas Islam Indonesia
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 7 Documents
Search

 1 
Kemandirian Pengadilan Dalam Proses Penegakan Hukum Pidana Menuju Sistem Peradilan Pidana Yang Bebas Dan Bertanggung Jawab Rusli Muhammad
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 16 No. 4 (2009)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol16.iss4.art2

Abstract

This research discusses problems on judicial independence in relation to the effort the criminal law enforcement. There are two basic problem in this study, first, how judicial independence in the context of criminal law enforcement is, what the influential factors behind it are and what implication causes are. Second, how the effort made for the reformation of judicial independence toward independence and responsible criminal judicial systems.The approach used for this reseaach is socio legal studies and systems appoarch with philosophical appoach as a complement. Data were collected by interview and distributing questioners, data collected were analyzed using discriptive analytical methods. The law of the degree of judicial independence was caused by miscellanies internal and external factors. Internal factors aimed are factors in the body of system which directly interrelated with judicial system. Whereas external factors are factors which lie out side judicial system.Key words: judicial independence, law enforcement, restructurisation, revitalization of judicial and reform to regulation
Eksistensi Hakim dalam Pemikiran Yuridis dan Keadilan Rusli Muhammad
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 21 No. 3: Juli 2014
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol21.iss3.art5

Abstract

The researched problem is how the existence of court judge seen from juridical thinking and justice concept through time is. The research method was normative research with philosophical and conceptual approach. The findings of this research are: first, judges are responsible for judicial proceedings and decision related to all the cases they handle, by using legal logic and thinking as well as justice principles. Second, judges who act as a part of law enforcement are responsible for upholding justice by finding the legal principles by digging, obeying, and understanding any values existing in societies. Third, judges should always make judiciary as a primary institution which is independent and decisive, and as a central institution, not as a marginal institution which is dependent and controlled by any political, financial, and authority influences. Fourth, in the future, judges must be willing to participate actively in eradicating and preventing any occurrence of judicial mafia and making the judiciary free from any judicial mafia. Fifth, maintaining the existence of judges is determined by work performance, professionalism, idealism, and sufficient facility as well as internal and external supports.
Tinjauan Kritis Terhadap Kebijakan Pengaturan Masalah Pidana Dan Pemidanaan Dalam RUU KUHP Rusli Muhammad
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 13 No. 2: Mei 2006
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol13.iss2.art1

Abstract

The tendency of criminal regulation and punishment in the Criminai Cocfe Draft more emphasize to the relative theory than other theories. Nevertheless, the imprisonment sanction still becomes the priority, and the great sanction is imposed to the crime appointed to the state which is greater than crime to the religion.
Penyelenggaraan Peradilan Pidana (Studi tentang: Model-Model dan Faktor-Faktor yang Berperan dalam Peradilan Pidana) Rusli Muhammad
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 9 No. 20: Juni 2002
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol9.iss20.art4

Abstract

The implementation the criminal judicature donotautomatically appear, butit appearsby models support it. Every model applicated and operated in the system of criminal judicature depend on the model selected, but this model is not something concrete but it is something abstract as reflection of the certain values. The implementation the criminal judicature is diseparable with various kinds of factor influence. The harmonious and qualified correlation from these various factors determine very much on the smoothness and the quality of its output. The ignorance for one of the factors would result to the failureand the low of the quality about implementation on the criminal judicature. The various kind of models and factors in implementing the criminal judicature woul be triedto expose on this writing.
Strategi dalam Membangun Kembali Kemandirian Pengadilan di Indonesia . Rusli Muhammad
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 11 No. 26: Mei 2004
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol11.iss26.art2

Abstract

The independence of the court has been regardedand it has guarantee in constitution, butinaction, especially the action ofcn'minal lawenforcement in Indonesia, the independence of the court is in the lowest rankeven buried. To rebuild the independence of the court, such that, the correlation of the court with other component is unseparable, for instance, structure, regulation,, and personal componentsof the court. With consideration oft hecourt component, the strategy in rebuilding of the independence of the court is donethrough taking reconstnictionofthe court, the reform of regulation and revitalization of the court.
Pengaturan dan Urgensi Whistle Blower dan Justice Collaborator dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Rusli Muhammad
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 22 No. 2: APRIL 2015
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol22.iss2.art2

Abstract

The first and foremost problem in this study is the setting of Whistle Blower and Justice Collaborator in Indonesia. The second is the urgency and the existence of Whistle Blowers and Justice Collaborator in the Criminal Justice System. To analyze those problems the researcher used a normative juridical research. On the basis of the study it is revealed that, first, there are some rules governing the Whistle Blower and Justice Collaborator in the Criminal Justice System, but there is no room for its setting in the Criminal Code (KUHAP). Second, the urgency and the existence of Whistle Blowers and Justice Collaborator can be found through the workings of both the Criminal Justice System in the Investigation, Prosecution, Trial and in the implementation of decisions
Agenda Reformasi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Rusli Muhammad
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 6 No. 11 (1999)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Meningkatnya kejahatan diikuti dengan bertambahnya korban jiwa harta di masyarakat adalah indikator lemahnya dan gagalnya sistem peradilan pidana sehingga tawaran melakukan reformasi adalah semuah alternatif yang harus dilakukan pada seluruh bagian-bagian atau sub-sub sistem pendukungnya, terutama menyangkut struktur kelembagaan, materi hukum dan moralitas manusianya. Mengabaikan salah satu sasaran ini, maka reformasi yang dilakukan tidak akan membawa dampak positif pada upaya penanggulangan kejahatan dan perlindungan masyarakat.
Co-Authors