Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM
R. Nazriyah
Universitas Islam Indonesia
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Kewenangan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi dalam Penyidikan Kasus Simolator SIM (Kapolri VS KPK) R. Nazriyah
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 19 No. 4: Oktober 2012
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol19.iss4.art6

Abstract

The research is aimed at finding out which institution, the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) or the Indonesian National Police (POLRI), actually has the authority to conduct investigations in the driving simulator case because both institutions stated that they had the authority. This research uses a normative approach supported by legal approach and case study. The type of data is secondary data. The data sources include primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The research finding is that according to Law No.30 Year 2002 on Corruption Eradication Commission, Article 50, the Corruption Eradication Commission has the authority to conduct investigations. This authority is also strengthened by the statement of President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono. To settle the dispute between KPK and POLRI, the President stated in his speech on 8 October 2012 that the driving simulator case involving Inspector General Djoko Susilo should be handled by KPK. Moreover, considering the Memorandum of Understanding among Corruption Eradication Commission, Indonesian National Police, and Attorney General, the authority should be given to KPK.
Dinamika Pemilihan Gubernur Jawa Timur R. Nazriyah
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 20 No. 4: Oktober 2013
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol20.iss4.art8

Abstract

This research is aimed at finding the reasons of the Board of Trustees of the General Election Committee (DKPP) in granting the charge of Khofifah Indar Parawansa and the reasons of the Constitutional Court in rejecting the charge related with the Regional Head Election of East Java in 2013. This research is a normative research with the approaches used consisting of Acts and Case studies. The data used are secondary data involving primary legal material, secondary legal material, and tertiary legal material. The data collected were then analyzed qualitatively. The result of the research concludes that according to the Costitutional Court, the Jalan Lain Menuju Kesejahteraan Rakyat (Jalin Kesra) program conducted by Soekarwo is not a fatal mistake in the Regional Head Election. According to the Constitutional Court, the program is a sustainable program initiated and conducted since 2010. Meanwhile, the consideration of DKPP to grant the charge of Khofifah-Herman is because the General Election Committee was proven of diminishing the party constitutional right to suggest a candidate in the Regional Head Election of East Java including Khofifah-Herman for the candidate for governor and deputy governor. The grant and social assisstance (bansos) program must be conducted in the first three years of the regional head governance so that there will not be an allegation of the grant and social assistance manipulation for campaign activities if the incumbent plans to be reelected.
Pengaturan Pelaksanaan Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Serentak R. Nazriyah
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 22 No. 1: Januari 2015
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol22.iss1.art6

Abstract

The issues to be examined in this research is how does the practice of simultaneous Local Election according to the valid legislation and which institution is authorized to settle the disputes of simultaneous local elections? This research is normative. The study found that Article 3 (1) regulation number 1 2014 About the Election of governors, regents and mayors passed into law No. 1 Year 2015 on the Election of governors, regents, and the Mayor state that, the local election is held every 5 (five) years simultaneously throughout the territory of the Republic of Indonesia.The Local Election schedule is implemented in several periods. Meanwhile the simultaneous national elections is held in 2027. Law No. 1 2015 mandates the Constitutional Court to resolve the dispute over the local elections, despite the fact that it is unlikely for one institution to examine and judge hundreds of cases of disputed local elections at the same time. Local Election dispute resolution processes also have a specified time limit. To that end, the institutions considered most appropriate to handle election disputes is the Supreme Court by delegating the High Court in each region. If litigants are not satisfied with the decision of the High Court then, they may appeal to the Supreme Court.
Co-Authors