Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Ius Civile: Refleksi Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan
W. Riawan Tjandra
Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Perbandingan Sistem Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara dan Conseil d’etat sebagai Institusi Pengawas Tindakan Hukum Tata Usaha Negara W. Riawan Tjandra
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 20 No. 3: Juli 2013
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol20.iss3.art5

Abstract

French State Administrative Court system and Indonesian State Administrative Court system basically have many similarities. The legal problem studied in this paper is related to the attempt to widely manage the judge proactivity principle in the State Administrative Court to attribute the advisory function of the State Administrative Court as a part of active dimensions of the preventive control of the State Administrative Court toward the state administrative staff before a State Administrative Decision is stipulated. The research method used to discuss the problem is the normative legal research using legal comparative approach. The result of the study concludes that there is a necessity to broaden the function of State Administrative Court in Indonesia to increase the quality of the state administrative decisions issued by the state administrative authorities.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN KEPALA DAERAH ATAS PENYALAHGUNAAN DANA TRANSFER KE DAERAH: TANGGUNG JAWAB HUKUM DAN POLITIK M. Khairu Mamnun; W. Riawan Tjandra
Ius Civile: Refleksi Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 9, No 2 (2025): Oktober
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Teuku Umar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35308/jic.v9i2.12571

Abstract

This paper examines the complexity of regional heads' accountability for the misuse of Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers (TKD) within Indonesia's fiscal decentralization framework. Although TKD is intended to support equitable development and improve welfare, it is often misappropriated by regional leaders at various levels. Employing a normative juridical method with literature review and case study approaches, this study reveals that misuse of TKD is not only a legal violation but also reflects structural weaknesses in fiscal and political oversight systems. Legally, accountability is enforced through criminal and administrative instruments involving the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), the Police, the Attorney General’s Office, and the Audit Board (BPK). Politically, mechanisms such as accountability reports to local parliaments (LKPJ), the right of inquiry, and public opinion play roles in supervising regional leaders. However, inadequate human resources, political interference, permissive culture, and poor inter-agency coordination hinder effective accountability. Therefore, an integrated strategy is required—encompassing digitalization of regional finance, strengthened oversight, regulatory reform, and public participation—to build a transparent and accountable fiscal governance system.
Co-Authors M. Khairu Mamnun