Muhammad Arif Setiawan
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

Resolusi Sengketa Kolektif Di Bidang Pertanahan Dalam Perspektif Hukum Dan Sosial Muhammad Arif Setiawan
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 13 No. 2: Mei 2006
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol13.iss2.art10

Abstract

There are various choice of alternative communal dispute resolution modees in land dispute. In fact, the implementation of positive legal approach isnotthe only instrument to settle thedispute. Sometimes, the positive legal approach may. raise opposition which triggers a stringent measures which come from the marginal society andcome from the authority holders.
Kriminalisasi Terorisme di Indonesia dalam Era Globalisasi Muhammad Arif Setiawan
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 9 No. 21: September 2002
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol9.iss21.art6

Abstract

Criminalistiaon of terrorism in Indonesia is certainly related to the global dinamization process occurred recently. Viewed substantially the cnme of terrorism for specifically international terronsm actually is not the single crime because it can be a transnational crime. Even through seeing the terronsm ofcrime correlated to the crimeSj theprocess ofcn'minalization from the various of aspects mustbe determined comprehen sively.
Pembaharuan Hukum Acara Pidana Berwawasan Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Perspektif Teori Konstrusionisme Muhammad Arif Setiawan
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 9 No. 20: Juni 2002
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol9.iss20.art3

Abstract

In theoretic perspective for constructionism, each of the parties involved in the process on criminai court is suitable with the position andthe roie of each the process for criminal court it self would make ideas to decide for their own objectives andto act as according to the objectives assigned deliberateiy. In doing this action, then they give the meaning to their action or behaviour and as well as they will give thereasons about theaction to carryout. The consequence isthe raising on different meaning. These writings describe about the innovation oflaw on criminal procedure in the frame of Human Right in the theoretical perspective of constructionism.
Kriminalisasi dalam Peraturan-peraturan Daerah di Propinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta dalam Perspektif Politik Kriminal Muhammad Arif Setiawan
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 11 No. 26: Mei 2004
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol11.iss26.art6

Abstract

There is any trend of criminal threat in theendorsed laws in Yogyakarta Special province. It especially deals with the regional tax viewed from criminal punishment perspective has been proportioned as the norm of regulation, it seems that to be forced socially and economically. The main aim of enclosing criminal sanction on regulation non-criminal punishment is actually forforcing inorder that society meet the Endorse Laws.
STUD! HUKUM DALAM PERSPEKTIF SOSIAL - Analisis Mengenai Gerakan Sosiologi dalaih Hukum dan Relevansinya dengan Studi Hukum di Indonesia Muhammad Arif Setiawan
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 2 No. 4: September 1995
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol2.iss4.art5

Abstract

Perubahan sosial yang sudah dan masih akan terus berjalan, telahmencuatkan suatu formulasi dan pemikiran baru tentang hukum dan kaitannya dengan rnasyarakat. Munculnya gerakan sosiologi dalam hukum atau sociological model, telah menohok secara vis a vis terhadap pengagum dan pendukung legal exclusivisme.