Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Jurnal Ius Constituendum International Journal of Social Science, Education, Communication and Economics
Muhammad Arif Setiawan
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Kuhap dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia Muhammad Arif Setiawan
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 6 No. 9 (1997)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

sebagian kalangan banyak menilai bahwa ketentuan dalam KUHP dinilai masih lemah dalam melindungi tersangka/terdakwa. Tulisan ini bahkan menyorot banyaknya aturan dalam KUHP  yang mendukung terjadinya pelanggaran dan yang paling menyolok, adalah ketidakadaan sanksi bagi aparatnya.
Kajian Kritis Teori-Teori Pembenaran Pemidanaan Muhammad Arif Setiawan
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 6 No. 11 (1999)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Mengapa negara mempunyai hak menjauhkan pidana dan apakah yang menjadi dasar pemikirannya sehingga negara mempunyai hak untuk menjatuhkan pidana? Herbert L. Pecker melalui sebuah bukunya yang berjudul "The Limits of the Criminal Senction", mengawali bukunya dengan membahas masalah yang berkenaan dengan pengertian pidana dan dasar-dasar pembenaran hukum pidana. Packer telah menjelajahi pemikiran mengenai dasar-dasar pembenaran pemidanaan, sehingga ia sampai pada kesimpulan bahwa tujuan pemidanaan sebenarnya hanya ada dua yaitu untuk memberikan suatu penderitaan dan untuk mencegah terjadinya kejahatan. Namun demikian ternyata ia tidak puas dengan berbagai teori yang ada, sampai ia mengajukan suatu teori yang dinamakannya sebagai teori pembenaran pemidanaan yang terpadu  "integrated Theory of Criminal Punishment". artike ini mengandalkan sumber rujukan utama pada buku karya Packer tersebut, dan sengaja mengutip pendapat Packer untuk memeproleh pandangan yang cukup lengkap, yang diharapkan bermanfaat bagi perkembangan pemikiran hukum pidana di Indonesia yang sekarng ini masih dalam proses pembaharuan hukum, khususnya yang  berkaitan dengan pemikiran mengenai dasar-dasar pembenaran pemidanaan terhadap perilaku kriniman.
When Double Intention Ignored: A Study of Corruption Judicial Decisions Muhammad Arif Setiawan; Mahrus Ali
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 28 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2021
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol28.iss3.art1

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the application of participating perpetrator in court decisions in corruption cases. The research question is whether the double intention as a condition for participating perpetrator in the decision of a corruption case is fulfilled? As a normative legal research, the study in this research is focused on the ratio of four decisions on corruption cases, especially the concept of criminal participation. The results of the study concluded that the double-intentional evidence as a condition for participating perpetrator so was ignored by the panel of judges. The role of involvement of each defendant in the offense of participating perpetrator in the ongoing decision is not described. The judge is not even able to distinguish between the conditions of a person as a perpetrator and the participating perpetrator. In the decisions studied, the judges also mixed the concepts of ordering, advocating, and participating in committing criminal acts of corruption. The judge's inaccuracy in the use of double intention resulted in the emergence of an unfair sentence. Therefore, this study suggests that the Supreme Court should make guidelines for the application of participating perpetrator in corruption cases.
BRIBERY AND GRATUITY: REGULATORY ANALYSIS AND JUDICIAL RESPONSE Ach. Tahir; Mahrus Ali; Muhammad Arif Setiawan
Jurnal Ius Constituendum Vol 6, No 2 (2021): OKTOBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jic.v6i2.4093

Abstract

This paper is aimed at analyzing the concepts and parameters to determine an act as a bribery and gratuity in the Anti-Corruption Law and court cases.  This involved the application of the doctrinal legal research to understand these differences. The results of this study showed that bribery requires a meeting of mind between the bribe givers and bribe recipients which is not found in gratuity. The reporting mechanism and the reversal burden of proof do not apply to bribery while Operation Catching Hand does not apply to gratuity due to its inability to satisfy the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code. Criminal sanctions are also imposed on both the giver and the recipient of a bribe while the act of a giver in gratuity is not considered as a criminal offense. The study also found that the court failed to apply these essential differences.
Arrest and Detention in Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code under Human Rights Perspective Muhammad Arif Setiawan
International Journal of Social Science, Education, Communication and Economics (SINOMICS JOURNAL) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): June
Publisher : LAFADZ JAYA Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/sj.v1i2.15

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze the regulatory framework on arrest and detention in Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code under human rights perspective. This study employed doctrinal legal research using statute and conceptual approaches. The findings of this research reveal that the principles of law enforcement and human rights, which include the principles of legality, necessity, and proportionality, are essentially general principles that can be used to determine whether state actions that interfere with citizens' rights and freedoms violate or do not violate human rights. The legal provisions concerning arrest and detention did not fit the human rights standpoint particularly in the context of procedure and the length of detention. The proportionality and the necessity principle have not been fully considered as the ethical basis for arresting the perpetrator of a crime. Hence, what is needed is to amend the Criminal Procedure Code considering the adoption of both necessity and proportionality principle in the arrest and detention.
Co-Authors Ach. Tahir Mahrus Ali