Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM
Abdul Ghoffar
Mahkamah Konstitusi
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Dua Rupa: The Instigator dan Agent of Social Change Abdul Ghoffar
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 24 No. 2: APRIL 2017
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol24.iss2.art1

Abstract

After more than a decade that Constitutional Court (MK) carries out its constitutional duties, this institution that was formed on 13 August 2003 has issued thousands of decisions The main problems in this research are, first, how is the role of the Constitutional Court on social change in society? Second, as a judicial institution, what kind of change model that the Constitutional Court does; is it the Instigator of Social Change or Agent of Social Change? Third, does the society prefer the role of the Constitutional Court as Instigator of Social Change or Agent of Social Change? The research method used in this research was normative-juridical research method. The results of the research concluded that, first, as a juridicial institution, the Constitutional Court has a significant role in making social changes to society. There are at least two decisions issued by the Constitutional Court that have changed public attitude, namely Decision of the Constitutional Court No 46/ PUU-VIII/2010 on "Children outside of Marriage" and Decision of the Constitutional Court No 47-81/PHPU.A-VII/2009 on "About Noken System". Second, in making such social changes, there are at least two models used by the Constitutional Court, namely playing the roles as Instigator of Social Change and Agent of Social Change. Third, society prefers the Constitutional Court to serve as Agent of Social Change rather than as Instigator of Social Change. 
Hak Konstitusional Partai Politik dan Konsekuensi Calon Presiden-Wakil Presiden Tunggal di Indonesia Abdul Ghoffar
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 25 No. 2: MEI 2018
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol25.iss2.art8

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the constitutional rights of political parties in nominating President-Vice President candidates, and the possibility of single candidate to result in a vacancy in the position of President-Vice President in Indonesia. This study used normative legal method, with a statute approach, historical approach, and a comparative approach. The results of this study concluded that: First, in terms of constitution, there is no presidential threshold on political parties to propose President-Vice President candidates. In addition, according to Article 6A paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, all political parties that qualify as the participants in the 2019 Election have the right to nominate President-Vice President candidates; not only those parties that have representatives in the House of People’s Representatives (DPR). Second, a single candidate has the potential to result in a vacancy in presidency because if the winner is an empty box, then it is certain that Indonesia does not have a President-Vice President
Co-Authors