Isharyanto Isharyanto
Universitas Sebelas Maret

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Pengalaman Vietnam Melakukan Transplantasi Hukum: Persaingan Terhadap Kondisi Domestik Setempat Isharyanto Isharyanto
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 27 No. 1: JANUARI 2020
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol27.iss1.art3

Abstract

This paper describes the problems and challenges as the effects of legal transplantation. As a policy alternative, legal transplantation is an appropriate short-term solution to immediately produce a new legal formulation. This study focuses on analyzing the characters of legal transplant in Vietnam which reflects the competition in local domestic conditions. This doctrinal legal research uses both conceptual and historical approach. The conceptual approach refers to the issue of legal transplantation while the historical approach refers to the historical course of law in Vietnam. Conclusively, in Vietnam's experience, the results of a legal transplant did not take place smoothly and immediately. The footprint of the legal transition and the combination of traditional order with the influence of colonial inheritance law causes the transplantation effect to not immediately contribute to positive conditions for legal development. Apart from the rigid communist system, which accommodates a market-friendly liberal economic system, the need for regulation in accordance with the development of contemporary social relations arises. However, party interference, including in controlling judges and courts, causes mixed forms of legal transplantation that have no equivalent in the mainstream legal system. Transplanted law in Vietnam does not only present a new face to the law and court system, but also influences the challenges of future development so that the transplantation effect can contribute to positive steps for legal reform.
Kinerja Pengadilan dalam Lingkaran Kekuasaan Otoritarian Isharyanto Isharyanto
Undang: Jurnal Hukum Vol 1 No 2 (2018)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (203.185 KB) | DOI: 10.22437/ujh.1.2.267-294

Abstract

This paper aims to describe socio-juridically the performance of courts in authoritarian circles of power. The court is increasingly demanded attention by academics of constitutional law, along with the expectation of a role in the presence of power. Courts, of course by involving judicial apparatus, especially judges, are controlled by the executive but are able to negotiate their functions to support the government. Courts can provide legitimacy both internally and externally as well as being an effective tool for maintaining power. On this side, every regime of power has an interest of the court. Therefore, the idealita of the court then also related with independence, which is not only for the rule of law, constitutionality and human rights, but also in relation to globalization, free and efficient economic activities. If the judges are independent, they are basically protected from undue influence from those who can damage their impartiality. With variations that are not the same, but working in the same circle of power, courts in Singapore and Pakistan confirm these matters. Abstrak Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan secara sosio yuridis kinerja pengadilan dalam lingkaran kekuasaan yang otoritarian. Pengadilan semakin dituntut perhatiannya oleh akademisi hukum tata negara, seiring harapan akan peran di hadapan kekuasaan. Pengadilan, tentu saja dengan melibatkan aparatur peradilan, terutama hakim, dikendalikan eksekutif akan tetapi mampu menempatkan negosiasi fungsi mereka untuk mendukung pemerintah. Pengadilan bisa memberikan legitimasi secara internal maupun eksternal sekaligus menjadi alat efektif untuk mempertahankan kekuasaan. Pada sisi ini, setiap rezim kekuasaan berkepentingan dengan pengadilan. Oleh sebab itu, idealita pengadilan kemudian juga berurusan dengan independensi, yang tidak hanya untuk supremasi hukum, konstitusionalitas, dan hak asasi manusia, tetapi juga dalam kaitannya dengan globalisasi, kegiatan ekonomi yang bebas, dan efisien. Jika hakim independen, mereka pada dasarnya dilindungi dari pengaruh yang tidak semestinya dari pihak-pihak yang dapat merusak ketidakberpihakan mereka. Dengan variasi yang tidak sama, namun bekerja dalam lingkaran kekuasaan yang sama, pengadilan di Singapura dan Pakistan memberikan konfirmasi atas hal-hal tersebut.