Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM
Ni'matul Huda
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Problematika Pengaturan Tindak Lanjut Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Perkara Pidana Oleh Mahkamah Agung Ni'matul Huda
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 27 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2020
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol27.iss3.art1

Abstract

There are several decisions of the Constitutional Court (MK) regarding judicial review which are not only difficult to implement in practice but also followed-up in a variety of ways. Several norms in the Criminal Code (KUHP) and the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), are some of those that are often petitioned for review at the Constitutional Court. There are two main problems in this paper, first, how is the implementation of the Constitutional Court decision in a criminal case followed-up by the Supreme Court (MA)? Second, how should the Supreme Court's decision follow-up in criminal cases? This study concludes, first, the follow-up after the Constitutional Court's decision (especially judicial review) in criminal cases by the Supreme Court in the form of Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA), Supreme Court Regulations (PERMA), and there are even those who ignore the Constitutional Court's decision because the Supreme Court’s decision still rests on the provisions that have been canceled by the Court. Second, to follow-up on the Constitutional Court's decision by the Supreme Court in a criminal case, a legal product in the form of a Supreme Court Regulation must be issued. This is necessary for the smooth running of the judiciary or to fill legal gaps and loopholes resulting from the Constitutional Court's decision. For this reason, the People's Representative Council (DPR) and the Government should immediately revise the Criminal Code and Criminal Procedure Code so as not to create a legal vacuum, so as to provide justice and legal certainty for the community.
Kedudukan Dan Materi Muatan Peraturan Menteri Dalam Perspektif Sistem Presidensial Ni'matul Huda
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 28 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2021
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol28.iss3.art5

Abstract

The obesity of regulations at the central and regional levels lead to problems in structuring legislation. The various ministerial regulations make it difficult for local governments to follow up. The problems studied in this research are first, what is the position and content of ministerial regulations in the perspective of legislation and the presidential system in Indonesia? Second, how to avoid obesity in the formation of ministerial regulations in the administration of government? The two problems will be analyzed in descriptive-qualitative manner, using statutory and conceptual approaches. The results of this study conclude that first, ministerial regulations are essentially not included in the hierarchy of laws and regulations, yet they can be issued by the minister as long as there is an authority or order from a higher law to regulate it and only applies internally for the benefit of the present institution. However, the ministers in the presidential system are not responsible to the parliament but to the president, hence the right person to stipulate the laws and regulations should be the president; second, to avoid the occurrence of obesity in the formation of ministerial regulations, the president only needs to form a Government Regulation or Presidential Regulation, and does not need to delegate it to the minister to form implementing regulations.
Co-Authors