Ariyanto
Departemen Hukum Perdata, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Akibat Hukum Pemegang Hak Tanggungan Yang Tidak Mendaftarkan Sebagai Kreditor Dalam Kepailitan Ariyanto
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 29 No. 2: MEI 2022
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol29.iss2.art4

Abstract

This study focuses on the dualism of security law and bankruptcy law. The purpose of this study is to identify and analyze two issues: first, the legal consequences for mortgage holders who are not registered as creditors as well as the 60-days expiration of self-execution in bankruptcy; and second, legal protection for mortgage holders who are not registered as creditors following the expiration period for self-execution in bankruptcy. This is a normative legal research with a statutory, conceptual and case approaches. The results of the study conclude: first, the legal consequences for the mortgage holders not registered as a creditor resulting in the mortgage holder being unable to collect the debtor's obligations as they have been declared bankrupt and insolvent; Second, the object of collateral that cannot be sold through a public auction at the request of the curator must be submitted by the mortgage holder to the curator and becomes the debtor's bankrupted asset (boedel). Key Words: Material guarantee; mortgage holder; bankruptcy Abstrak Studi ini difokuskan pada dualisme hukum jaminan dan hukum kepailitan. Tujuan studi ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis dua hal: pertama, akibat hukum pemegang hak tanggungan yang tidak mendaftarkan sebagai kreditor dan berakhirnya waktu 60 hari eksekusi sendiri dalam kepailitan. Kedua, perlindungan hukum bagi pemegang hak tanggungan yang tidak mendaftarkan sebagai kreditor dan berakhirnya waktu 60 hari eksekusi sendiri dalam kepailitan. Jenis penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statue approach), konseptual (conceptual approach), dan kasus (case approach). Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan: pertama, akibat hukum pemegang hak tanggungan yang tidak mendaftarkan sebagai kreditor mengakibatkan pemegang hak tanggungan tidak dapat menagih kewajiban utangnya debitor karena sudah dinyatakan dalam keadaan pailit dan insolvensi; Kedua, objek jaminan yang tidak dapat dijual melalui lelang dimuka umum atas permintaan kurator harus diserahkan pemegang hak tanggungan kepada kurator dan menjadi boedel pailit debitor. Kata Kunci: Jaminan kebendaan; pemegang hak tanggungan; kepailitan
Electronic Trial At The Supreme Court: Needs, Challenges And Arrangement Nurjihad Nurjihad; Ariyanto Ariyanto
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol 11, No 2 (2021): Vol. 11, No.2, Desember 2021
Publisher : Muhammadiyah University Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v11i2.16348

Abstract

Purpose of thestudy: This study aims to find out about the current needs, challenges, and arragment for The Electronic Trial at The Supreme Courts. The implementation of e-court that has been running so far still causes problems, so it needs an in-depth study.Methodology: In this research, the method used was normative juridical using a statutory and conceptual approach.Results: The result of this study conclude that: first, the factual needs of the implementation of electronic trials in Indonesia cannot be separated from the social transformation that occurs in Indonesian society itself. Second, the general challenge in the implementation of electronic trials, which are trials and verdicts pronounced in court hearings that are open to the public or in public, is one part that is inseparable from the principle of fair trial. Third, the regulations related to the public trial should start from the preparation of PERMA that must obey the principle and with laws that are hierarchically higher than PERMA.Applications of this study: This research is expected to identify the challenges posed in electronic courts, and provide policy recommendations on the regulation of electronic courts in Indonesia.Novelty/ Orginalty of this study: Changes to the Law on Judicial Power must be formulated first in order to facilitate electronic court process services in the current digital era. Then, the existing PERMA needs to be adjusted to the principles of the principle of a trial open to the public in order to prevent conflicts with the laws and regulations on it.