Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Perspektif : Kajian Masalah Hukum dan Pembangunan
Atet Sumanto
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya, Jl. Dukuh Kupang XXV No. 54, Surabaya
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
TATA CARA PELAKSANAAN PENANGGUHAN PENAHANAN TERHADAP TERSANGKA DI LEMBAGA KEPOLISIAN BERDASARKAN KUHAP DAN PERATURAN PELAKSANAANNYA Umi Enggarsasi; Atet Sumanto
Perspektif Vol 10, No 4 (2005): Edisi Oktober
Publisher : Institute for Research and Community Services (LPPM) of Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (671.874 KB) | DOI: 10.30742/perspektif.v10i4.201

Abstract

Detention pursuant to KUHAP is location or certain defendant in place by Investigator or public prosecutor or Judge with its stipulating, while reason to source the detention as arranged in Section 21 KUHAP mentioned that detention can be with the consideration for example, defendant felt concerned about to break away defendant felt concerned about will destroy eliminating evidence goods, and, defendant felt concerned about will again doing an injustice. Defendant can ask the detention deferment based on Section 31 KUHAP to police detention with the guarantee of money or people or on trust pursuant to condition determined, while such condition determined that is obliged to report, do not go out the house or town, and a period to detention deferment from defendant do not the inclusive of a period to prisoner status as arranged in KUHAP.
SISTEM PEMBUKTIAN TERBALIK (SHIFTING THE BURDEN OF PROOF) MENURUT UU NO 20 TAHUN 2001 JO UU NO 31 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI Atet Sumanto
Perspektif Vol 11, No 3 (2006): Edisi Juli
Publisher : Institute for Research and Community Services (LPPM) of Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (216.212 KB) | DOI: 10.30742/perspektif.v11i3.281

Abstract

That inversed verification according to UU No. 20 Year 2001 Jo UU No. 31 Year 1999 having the character of is limited, and proportional, its meaning of defendant have the right to prove that he do not corruption doing an injustice; That besides defendant have the right to prove, he obliged to give boldness about entire/all it’s good and chattel and consort estae, child, and good and chattel each; every people/or anticipated corporation have link with case.
PEMBERIAN REMISI TERHADAP NARAPIDANA DI LEMBAGA PEMASYARAKATAN Umi Enggarsasi; Atet Sumanto
Perspektif Vol 20, No 2 (2015): Edisi Mei
Publisher : Institute for Research and Community Services (LPPM) of Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (352.645 KB) | DOI: 10.30742/perspektif.v20i2.136

Abstract

Remisi merupakan hak narapidana untuk mendapatkan pengurangan pidana apabila selama menjalani pembinaan berkelakuan baik. Remisi yang merupakan hak narapidana dapat ditambah apabila yang bersangkutan melakukan perbuatan-perbuatan antara lain: Berbuat jasa kepada negara, dan Melakukan perbuatan yang bermanfaat bagi negara atau kemanusiaan, serta Melakukan perbuatan yang membantu kegiatan Lembaga Pemasyarakatan. Pengaturan remisi ada dalam beberapa peraturan yaitu: Keputusan Presiden No. 174 Tahun 1999 tentang Remisi; Keputusan Menteri Hukum dan Perundang-undangan RI No. M.09.HN.02.01 Tahun 1999 tentang Pelaksanaan Keputusan Presiden No. 174 Tahun 1999; Keputusan Menteri Hukum dan Perundang-Undangan No. M.10.HN.02.01 Tahun 1999 tentang Pelimpahan Wewenang Pemberian Remisi Khusus; Keputusan Presiden No. 120 Tahun 1995 tentang Ampunan Istimewa; Keputusan Menteri Kehakiman RI No. 04.HN.02.01 Tahun 1988 tentang Tambahan Remisi bagi Narapidana yang Menjadi Donor Organ Tubuh dan Donor Darah; Surat Edaran No. E.PS.01-03-15 tanggal 26 Mei 2000 tentang Perubahan Pidana Penjara Seumur Hidup Menjadi Pidana Penjara Sementara; dan Peraturan Pemerintah No. 99 Tahun 2012 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Peraturan Pemerintah No. 32 Tahun 1999 tentang Syarat dan Tata Cara Pelaksanaan Hak Warga Binaan Pemasyarakatan. Pelaksanaan remisi terhadap narapidana diawali dari permohonan Kepala Lembaga Pemasyarakatan kepada Kepala Kantor Wilayah Kementerian Hukum dan HAM terhadap narapidana yang layak mendapatkan remisi berdasarkan hasil pembinaan terhadap narapidana. Keputusan remisi yang diberikan oleh Kepala Kanwil Hukum dan HAM didasarkan atas laporan Kepala Lembaga pemasyarakatan dan Undang-Undang No. 12 Tahun 1995 tentang Pemasyarakatan dan PP No. 99 Tahun 2012.Remission is the right of inmates to get a reduction in crime when undergoing training during good behavior. Remission is the right of prisoners could be increased if the relevant deeds among others: Doing services to the state, and doing deeds that are beneficial to the country or humanity, as well as Perform the action that helps the activities Penitentiary. Remission arrangements in some of the rules are: Presidential Decree No. 174 year1999 concerning Remission; Minister of Law and Legislation Decree No. M.09.HN.02.01 year 1999 on the Implementation of Presidential Decree No. 174 of 1999; Minister of Law and Legislation Decree Number M.10.HN.02.01 year 1999 on Delegation of Authority granting Special Remission; Presidential Decree No. 120 year 1995 concerning the Special Forgiveness; Minister of Justice Decree No. 1988 on Additional 04.HN.02.01 Remission for prisoners Become Organ Donors and Blood; Circular Number E.PS.01-03-15 May 26 year 2000 on the Amendment of Criminal Life Imprisonment While Being Criminal Prison; and Government Regulation No. 99 Year 2012 regarding the Second Amendment to Government Regulation No. 32 Year1999 on Conditions and Procedures for the Implementation of the Right prisoners. Implementation of the remission of prisoners begins on the petition the Head of Penitentiary to the Head Office of the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights of prisoners are eligible for remission based on the guidance to the inmates. Decision remissions granted by the Head of Department of Law and Human Rights based on the reports of correctional and Head of the Institute of Law No. 12 Year 1995 on Penal and PP 99 Year 2012.
EFEKTIFITAS PIDANA MATI DALAM PROSES PENEGAKAN HUKUM TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA Atet Sumanto
Perspektif Vol 22, No 1 (2017): Edisi Januari
Publisher : Institute for Research and Community Services (LPPM) of Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (760.86 KB) | DOI: 10.30742/perspektif.v22i1.548

Abstract

Fenomena kasus narkotika yang beredar luas di Indonesia. Di mana narkotika telah merusak generasi bangsa Indonesia akibat peredaran narkotika oleh pengedar atau bandar narkoba yang menyasar pangsa pasar di Indonesia. Para penegak hukum kita juga tak henti-hentinya melakukan pemberantasan narkotika di Indonesia. Banyak para pelaku tindak pidana narkotika yang telah mendapat sanksi yang berat yakni pidana mati. Sebelumnya telah dilaksanakan eksekusi pidana mati tahap I dan tahap II, dan kemudian dilanjutkan dengan eksekusi mati tahap III bagi ke-4 terpidana mati atas kasus tindak pidana narkotika yang salah satunya merupakan bandar narkoba kontroversial di Indonesia yakni Freddy Budiman. Meskipun banyak perdebatan dari aktivis hak asasi manusia tentang pidana mati yang merupakan pelanggaran hak asasi manusia, namun hal itu tidak membuat gentar para penegak hukum kita untuk tidak melaksanakan eksekusi pidana mati. Mengingat pidana mati masih diberlakukan dan menjadi hukum materiil di Indonesia sebagaimana di atur dalam Pasal 10 KUHP. Diharapkan dengan pidana mati yang dijatuhkan bagi para pelaku tindak pidana narkotika dapat memberantas peredaran narkotika di Indonesia, mengingat pidana penjara sudah tidak terlalu efektif lagi diterapkan dan justru membuka peluang terpidana untuk menjadi residivis atau bahkan mengendalikan bisnis narkotika di dalam Lembagas Pemasyarakatan seperti dugaan kasus yang dilakukan oleh terpidana mati Freddy Budiman.Narcotic cases phenomenon has been circulated widely in Indonesia. This kind of drug has ruined some Indonesian generation life through drug trafficking by traffickers or drug dealers in Indonesia. Our law enforcers also ceaselessly fight narcotics in Indonesia. Many of the doers got death sentence punishment. Previously, executions have been carried out for phase I and phase II, and then proceed with the execution phase III for total 4 (four) person sentenced to death on drug criminal cases, one of which is a controversial drug dealer in Indonesia, named Freddy Budiman. Although there were many discussion and debate by human rights activists on the death penalty which is a violation of human rights, but it does not impede our law enforcement officials to carry out executions, considering death penalty is a part of law as stipulated in article 10 of the Criminal Code. By giving death penalty to the perpetrators of criminal drugs acts, then its expected to eradicate narcotics in Indonesia, considering that imprisonment is no longer effectively applied and provides an opportunity for the convict to become recidivists or even control the narcotics selling inside the prisons such as alleged cases conducted by Freddy Budiman.
KONTRADIKSI HUKUMAN MATI DI INDONESIA DIPANDANG DARI ASPEK HAK ASASI MANUSIA, AGAMA DAN PARA AHLI HUKUM Atet Sumanto
Perspektif Vol 9, No 3 (2004): Edisi Juli
Publisher : Institute for Research and Community Services (LPPM) of Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30742/perspektif.v9i3.347

Abstract

In pro party opinion, death sentence as the criminal sanction at ultimum remedium, still should be carried out for extreme crime, while as the opposite party the death of human being is beyond mankind rights.
PEMBERIAN REMISI TERHADAP NARAPIDANA DI LEMBAGA PEMASYARAKATAN Umi Enggarsasi; Atet Sumanto
Perspektif Vol. 20 No. 2 (2015): Edisi Mei
Publisher : Institute for Research and Community Services (LPPM) of Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30742/perspektif.v20i2.136

Abstract

Remisi merupakan hak narapidana untuk mendapatkan pengurangan pidana apabila selama menjalani pembinaan berkelakuan baik. Remisi yang merupakan hak narapidana dapat ditambah apabila yang bersangkutan melakukan perbuatan-perbuatan antara lain: Berbuat jasa kepada negara, dan Melakukan perbuatan yang bermanfaat bagi negara atau kemanusiaan, serta Melakukan perbuatan yang membantu kegiatan Lembaga Pemasyarakatan. Pengaturan remisi ada dalam beberapa peraturan yaitu: Keputusan Presiden No. 174 Tahun 1999 tentang Remisi; Keputusan Menteri Hukum dan Perundang-undangan RI No. M.09.HN.02.01 Tahun 1999 tentang Pelaksanaan Keputusan Presiden No. 174 Tahun 1999; Keputusan Menteri Hukum dan Perundang-Undangan No. M.10.HN.02.01 Tahun 1999 tentang Pelimpahan Wewenang Pemberian Remisi Khusus; Keputusan Presiden No. 120 Tahun 1995 tentang Ampunan Istimewa; Keputusan Menteri Kehakiman RI No. 04.HN.02.01 Tahun 1988 tentang Tambahan Remisi bagi Narapidana yang Menjadi Donor Organ Tubuh dan Donor Darah; Surat Edaran No. E.PS.01-03-15 tanggal 26 Mei 2000 tentang Perubahan Pidana Penjara Seumur Hidup Menjadi Pidana Penjara Sementara; dan Peraturan Pemerintah No. 99 Tahun 2012 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Peraturan Pemerintah No. 32 Tahun 1999 tentang Syarat dan Tata Cara Pelaksanaan Hak Warga Binaan Pemasyarakatan. Pelaksanaan remisi terhadap narapidana diawali dari permohonan Kepala Lembaga Pemasyarakatan kepada Kepala Kantor Wilayah Kementerian Hukum dan HAM terhadap narapidana yang layak mendapatkan remisi berdasarkan hasil pembinaan terhadap narapidana. Keputusan remisi yang diberikan oleh Kepala Kanwil Hukum dan HAM didasarkan atas laporan Kepala Lembaga pemasyarakatan dan Undang-Undang No. 12 Tahun 1995 tentang Pemasyarakatan dan PP No. 99 Tahun 2012.Remission is the right of inmates to get a reduction in crime when undergoing training during good behavior. Remission is the right of prisoners could be increased if the relevant deeds among others: Doing services to the state, and doing deeds that are beneficial to the country or humanity, as well as Perform the action that helps the activities Penitentiary. Remission arrangements in some of the rules are: Presidential Decree No. 174 year1999 concerning Remission; Minister of Law and Legislation Decree No. M.09.HN.02.01 year 1999 on the Implementation of Presidential Decree No. 174 of 1999; Minister of Law and Legislation Decree Number M.10.HN.02.01 year 1999 on Delegation of Authority granting Special Remission; Presidential Decree No. 120 year 1995 concerning the Special Forgiveness; Minister of Justice Decree No. 1988 on Additional 04.HN.02.01 Remission for prisoners Become Organ Donors and Blood; Circular Number E.PS.01-03-15 May 26 year 2000 on the Amendment of Criminal Life Imprisonment While Being Criminal Prison; and Government Regulation No. 99 Year 2012 regarding the Second Amendment to Government Regulation No. 32 Year1999 on Conditions and Procedures for the Implementation of the Right prisoners. Implementation of the remission of prisoners begins on the petition the Head of Penitentiary to the Head Office of the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights of prisoners are eligible for remission based on the guidance to the inmates. Decision remissions granted by the Head of Department of Law and Human Rights based on the reports of correctional and Head of the Institute of Law No. 12 Year 1995 on Penal and PP 99 Year 2012.
Co-Authors Umi Enggarsasi