M. Agung Wibowo
Jurusan Teknik Sipil FT. UNDIP Jl. Prof. Soedarto SH. Tembalang, Semarang 50275

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

ANALISA ESKALASI BIAYA PADA PROYEK INFRASTRUKTUR TAHUN JAMAK (Studi Kasus : Proyek Pembangunan Waduk Jatigede dan Proyek Pembangunan Waduk Jatibarang) Alif Fatoni; Muhammad Hanif; M. Agung Wibowo; Jati Utomo Dwi Hatmoko
Jurnal Karya Teknik Sipil Volume 2, Nomor 2, Tahun 2013
Publisher : Departemen Teknik Sipil, Fakultas Teknik Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

One of risk of multi years project contract is price adjustment. So, the government issued rules regarding price adjustments through Presidential Decree No. 70/2012 Article 92 that completes the previous rules. Rules about the price adjustment are described in more detail in the contract documents. This situation has led to the price adjustment calculations between different projects. The purpose of this study is to analyze the value of an escalation in the ongoing work items in Jatigede DamProject and Jatibarang Dam Project. Hopefully, through this research, regulation application number 70/2012 on contract documents related to price adjustment.The research was conducted by interview, field observation and simulation calculations based of Jatigede Dam Project and Jatibarang Dam Project contract documents  in data processing. Jatibarang Dam Project assign the value of contract component based on HPS (Owner Cost Estimate) from survey and set the index of economic indicators published by BPS. Jatigede Dam Projectassigns a value based on the cost factor analysis and establishes the unit price indices through the Wholesale Price Index and Consumer Price Index in Cirebon City. This research simulates the price adjustment by exchanging contract documents on both projects with the volume of work in March 2011 and April 2011. Simulation methods on Jatibarang Project generate escalations value 15.69% and 15.44% from the value of escalation methods Jatigede Dam Project. Simulation methods Jatigede Dam Project escalation generate value 175.03% and 161.35% of the value of escalation with methods Jatibarang Dam Project.
KAJIAN PELELANGAN KONSTRUKSI BERDASARKAN KEPPRES 80/2003 DAN PERPRES 54/2010 (Studi Kasus : LPSE Universitas Diponegoro) Nur Wakhid; Wahyu Kuncoro; M. Agung Wibowo; Hari Nugroho
Jurnal Karya Teknik Sipil Volume 2, Nomor 2, Tahun 2013
Publisher : Departemen Teknik Sipil, Fakultas Teknik Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1506.55 KB)

Abstract

Construction sector has an important role in increasing economic growth. To create a condition that all necessary infrastructure that can guarantee an increase in economic activity. Procurement of facilities and infrastructure as well as the government's infrastructure, using the budget of income and expenditure (APBN/APBD). To supervise the use of budget, procurement regulations are arranged Keppres 80/2003 and amended by Perpres 54/2010. The tender process is expected to use electronic media (e-procurement) to be more transparent, accountable, effective and efficient, in line with efforts to eradicate corruption, collusion and nepotism. The method of research used descriptive research. The sampling technique used purposive sampling with data taken from Diponegoro University 2 LPSE and questionnaires to the respondents as service providers, service users, and the auction committee. A descriptive analysis of data processing and data processing using a Likert scale questionnaire on the subject of the study variables. The results of comparative analysis based on the tender for the construction of Perpres 54/2010 is better than the Keppres 80/2003.In terms of the duration of the execution of the auction package is based on Perpres 54/2010 1.76 is faster, there was the time efficiency of 50%. The cost, Perpres 54/2010 is cheaper. In the case of list requirements, both rules have the same relative terms. In terms of accuracy in the selection of service providers in the Perpres 54/2010 be better. In terms of selection of participants is more stringent Perpres 54/2010 instead of Presidential Decree 80/2003. In terms of transparency in the determination of winners, that the new regulations more transparent. General opinion of the regulation services provider 54/2010 is better.