Miftahul Jannah
Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Bakti Negara

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

DUALITAS MAKNA SHADHDHAH DALAM NOMENKLATUR QIRA‘AT: Sejarah dan Perkembangannya dalam Qira‘at Shadhdhah Miftahul Jannah
Diya Al-Afkar: Jurnal Studi al-Quran dan al-Hadis Vol 6, No 02 (2018): Desember
Publisher : IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1003.928 KB) | DOI: 10.24235/diyaafkar.v6i02.3789

Abstract

This paper examines the history of qiraat, especially qiraat syāzzah. Qiraat syāzzah allegedly arose during the Caliph of Usmān along with the presence of muṣḥaf 'usmānī. However, when there is no syāzzah term itself. Newly in the time of Ibn Mujahid, the term syāzzah is well established in the qiraat discipline as opposed to qira'at sab'ah. From this, questions arise, what is the term used before the time of Ibn Mujahid? How does or how to identify qiraat syāzzah? How do the scholars respond to the term syāzzah popularized by Ibn Mujahid? Therefore, this study is significant not only to see the wealth of the opinion of the Ulama, but to indicate the existence of the continue and change in the area of qiraat syāzzah thinking. The diversity of opinions conveys the shift in the use of the term syāzzah of quantity into quality, which originates from the least reading being da'if.
Nim al-Quran Miftahul Jannah
MAGHZA Vol 3 No 1 (2018): Januari - Juni 2018
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin Adab dan Humaniora (FUAH), Universitas Islam Negeri Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1254.249 KB) | DOI: 10.24090/maghza.v3i1.1957

Abstract

This paper intends to further examine the concept of Niẓām al-Qur’ān which is promoted by al-Farāhi as the basis of its interpretation method. Thus, this paper places Niẓām al-Qur’ān as a material object and al-Farāhi as its formal object. The significance of this study is not only to see the wealth of the method of interpretation of the Qur'an but as a form of the development of the interpretation method itself. In addition, it shows the pattern of development in the realm of interrelated interpretive methods. In this case, al-Farāhi acknowledged what he was discussing - Niẓām al-Qur’ān - not something new, but he also emphasized the originality of the niẓām concept. The concept of Niẓām al-Qur'an for him is different from the concept of munāsabah. Niẓām al-Qur'an surpasses and munāsabah is part of it, not vice versa. From this concept, there appear wahdaniyah terms and ‘Amud. The first term is the difference between the two previous nomenclature and one of the three important elements in the concept of Niẓām al-Qur'an, besides tartīb and tanāsub. The second term is the central or central theme of each letter.