Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities
Gratianus Prikasetya Putra
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Pertanggungjawaban Pemilik dan Pengguna atas Kerusakan yang Diakibatkan oleh Hewan Peliharaan: Studi Perbandingan Hukum Indonesia dan Jerman Gratianus Prikasetya Putra
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Vol 51, No 2 (2017)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law - Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajish.2017.51.2.497-512

Abstract

Abstract: There are 2 (two) forms of liabilities which acknowledged by Civil Law, the first one is contractual based liability and the second one is tort based liability. If there is a liabilty based on an event which fulfill the elements as known in tort theory, so the tort based liability will be used. Today, there are some variations and developments in cases that intersect with the theory and regulation regarding tort. One of which related to that theory and regulation was the tort that has been done by an animal in Germany. According to that case it can be seen the possibilitiy of tort based liability that owned by an animal. This article will explain the comparation of the theory of tort based on Indonesian Law System and German Law System which influenced by Civil Law Legal System. The juridical-normative legal research method will be used to explain the comparation theory of tort and its liability based on those two legal systems which use the secondary data such as regulations and the literatures regarding the tort theory. Abstrak: Hukum perdata mengenal adanya 2 (dua) macam pertanggungjawaban, pertama pertanggungjawaban kontraktual dan yang kedua pertanggungjawaban perbuatan melawan hukum (PMH). Apabila sebuah pertanggungjawaban didasarkan atas sebuah peristiwa yang memenuhi unsur-unsur yang dikenal dalam teori PMH, maka pertanggungjawaban yang digunakan ialah pertanggungjawaban PMH. Dewasa ini terdapat perkembangan dan variasi dari kasus-kasus yang kerap bersinggungan dengan regulasi dan teori di dalam PMH. Salah satu variasi kasus yang berkaitan dengan hal tersebut ialah PMH yang dilakukan oleh seekor hewan, yang sempat terjadi di Jerman. Sehubungan dengan kasus tersebut dapat dilihat terkait kemungkinan seekor hewan dimintakan pertanggungjawaban atas PMH. Artikel ini akan menjelaskan perbandingan teori PMH berdasarkan hukum Indonesia dan hukum Jerman yang sama-sama dipengaruhi oleh sistem hukum civil law. Metode penelitian hukum yuridis normatif akan digunakan guna membahas komparasi teori PMH dan pertanggungjawabannya berdasarkan sistem hukum perdata di Indonesia maupun di Jerman yang akan menggunakan data sekunder berupa bahan-bahan hukum yang terdiri dari peraturan perundang-undangan dan literatur-literatur mengenai teori PMH.
Critical Analysis of the Supreme Court Decision Number 63/PUU-XIX/2021 Regarding Sold Flat of Copyrights Ester Renata Patricia; Gratianus Prikasetya Putra
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 5 No. 4 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v5i4.1611

Abstract

This article is titled Critical Analysis of The Supreme Court Decision Number 63/PUU-XIX/2021 regarding Sold Flat of Copyright which criticizes about The Law of The Republic of Indonesia Number 28 of 2014, hereinafter referred as UUHC, especially in Article 18 and 122. The aim of this research is to analyze the concept of sold flat in UUHC which is contradictory compared to common knowledge and its relevance to the law system in Indonesia. The research method used in this writing is a normative juridical research, namely by conducting a literature study. The study shows that the term to return the economic right to the creator after the sold flat contract reaches twenty-five years, is required because the theory which fundamentally underlies the drafting of UUHC was structured to prioritize protecting the creator (subject), not the creation (object). Therefore, instead of forcing that term in UUHC which causes contracditio in terminis, this study provides suggestion to remove the concept of sold flat in UUHC and use the concept of license as the only way for creator to transfer the economic right to be exercised by other parties as Licensee
Co-Authors Ester Renata Patricia