Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Hwian Christianto

University of Surabaya

Author-ID : 3158952

Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document

Claim Missing Document

Articles

From Crime Control Model to Due Process Model: A Critical Study of Wiretapping Arrangement by the Corruption Eradication Commission of Indonesia Hwian Christianto
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 7, No 3 (2020): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

This study compares three formal criminal laws on the corruption act to show the importance of due process model for wiretapping/lawful interception in Indonesia. Investigators of Indonesian Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) assume that the implementation of wiretapping based on the due process model decelerate the performance and independence of corruption eradication. The problem particularly happens on the execution of caught in the act operation. This study covers the design of wiretapping on corruption case linked with the due process model as an effort to guarantee the right of privacy. Firstly, legislators accentuated an effective corruption eradication, which highlights the implementation of the crime control model. Secondly, the latest amendment to the Law on Corruption Eradication Commission of Indonesia alters wiretapping to become a procedural activity for stronger synergy among the law enforcement institutions. The regulation of wiretapping as a method to reveal corruption case in Indonesia does not adhere to the due process model entirely. The wiretapping still tends to deal with stages of preliminary-investigation, investigation, prosecution, and the execution of internal approval process. From Crime Control Model to Due Process Model: Studi Kritis Pengaturan Penyadapan oleh Komisi Tindak Pidana Korupsi Republik Indonesia AbstrakHasil penelitian atas tiga undang-undang hukum pidana formil terkait tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia menunjukkan pentingnya model due process dalam penyadapan. Penyidik Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Republik Indonesia memandang pelaksanaan penyadapan berdasarkan model due process memperlambat kinerja dan independensi penegakan korupsi terutama dilakukannya Operasi Tangkap Tangan. Artikel ini membahas rancang bangun penyadapan pada tindak pidana korupsi dikaitkan dengan model due process sebagai upaya menjamin hak asasi manusia, secara khusus hak privasi. Pertama, awalnya pembentuk undang-undang lebih menekankan pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi secara efektif sehingga menunjukkan penerapan model pengawasan tindak pidana. Kedua, UU KPK RI mengubah penyadapan lebih prosedural dengan harapan menguatkan sinergitas antar lembaga penegak hukum. Pengaturan penyadapan atas tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia masih belum sepenuhnya memberlakukan model due process. Penyadapan masih bersifat sektoral dengan mencakup tahap penyelidikan, penyidikan dan penuntutan serta menjalankan proses perijinan secara internal. Kata kunci: korupsi, model due process, model pengawasan tindak pidana.DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v7n3.a7

Fulfilling the Right of Education during Covid19 Pandemic Period: A Comparative Study Hwian Christianto; Michelle Kristina
Jambura Law Review VOLUME 4 NO. 1 JANUARY 2022
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

The right of education for citizens has been fulfilled diversely following the government policies. This study aimed to emphasize the importance of the education right and the imposition of criminal sanctions in order to protect the right of education during the Covid-19 Pandemic particularly in Indonesia, Japan and Australia. Normative juridical research methods described that government policies as outlined in the legislation constantly followed by criminal sanctions. The concept of education right was understood in a different way during the Covid-19 pandemic, as one of the derogable-right or adapted human right. For its fulfillment, some education right uses criminal sanctions as a primum remidium, an ultimum remidium, or does not impose criminal sanctions at all. The right of education still reman as a very important human right even during the pandemic period

URGENSI INFORMED CONSENT SEBAGAI PENCEGAHAN TINDAK PIDANA OLEH DOKTER Inas Syadza Ikhsan; Hwian Christianto
Jurnal Hukum dan Kenotariatan Vol 6, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Malang

Dokter bukan hanya dibutuhkan ketika sakit, namun ketika sehat pun dokter sebenarnya diperlukan untuk mencegah penyakit atau menjaga dan meningkatkan kesehatan fisik maupun psikis dari pasiennya. Hubungan dokter-pasien adalah hubungan kepercayaan, jadi tanpa rasa percaya diantara keduanya, pengobatan tidak mungkin dilakukan dengan baik. Hubungan hukum antara dokter dan pasien adalah hubungan terapeutik. Hubungan hukum ini bersumber pada kepercayaan pasien terhadap dokter, sehingga pasien bersedia memberikan persetujuan tindakan medik (informed consent), yaitu suatu persetujuan pasien untuk menerima upaya medis yang akan dilakukan terhadapnya. Segala macam perawatan pasien yang dilakukan oleh dokter diperlukan persetujuan tindakan medik dari pasien, baik itu berbentuk lisan, isyarat maupun tertulis. Di dalam Hukum Pidana, apapun yang akan dilakukan oleh seseorang maka memerlukan suatu bukti pendukung sebagai bentuk pembenaran dari apa yang dilakukannya agar tidak mendapatkan permasalahan.Kata-Kunci: Informed consent, hukum pidana, dokter, pasien Doctors not only needed when sick, but even when healthy doctors are actually needed to prevent disease or maintain and improve the physical and psychological health of their patients. The doctor-patient relationship is a relationship of trust, so without trust between the two, treatment is impossible. The legal relationship between doctor and patient is a therapeutic relationship. This legal relationship is based on the patient's trust in the doctor, so that the patient is willing to give informed consent, which is the patient's consent to accept the medical treatment that will be carried out on him. All kinds of patient care carried out by doctors require the approval of medical actions from the patient, whether in the form of oral, sign or written. In Criminal Law, whatever a person will do, it requires supporting evidence as a form of justification for what he did so as not to get into trouble.Keywords: Informed consent, criminal law, doctor, patient

Title

Found 3 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 3 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 3 Documents
Search