Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Konten Pemuda Tersesat dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Efektivitas Dakwah Masa Kini Perdana Putra Pangestu; Muhammad Bachrul Ulum
Medina-te : Jurnal Studi Islam Vol 17 No 1 (2021): Medina-Te: Jurnal Studi Islam
Publisher : Pascasarjana Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

This study examines the Youtube content of "The Lost Youth" which has been busy being discussed since 2020. The content titled da'wah with this unusual method has succeeded in attracting more than 1 million viewers per episode. Researchers are interested in examining the formula used by the content creators, namely the controversial comedian duo: Tretan Muslim and Coki Pardede, as well as the national preacher Husein Ja'far Al-Haddar in the content, as well as how efficient the content is in the da'wah scene of Islam Nusantara. Not only using a comedic style in the delivery of da'wah, this content is also considered as a suitable tool for questions of today's Muslim youth who have high curiosity, but are constrained by norms in their delivery. This study uses a qualitative method with a descriptive approach. The data in this study were obtained from the Youtube content "The Lost Youth" which was uploaded to the Indonesian Funny Council channel, Jeda Nulis, and the Lost Youth. In addition, supporting data were also obtained by researchers from the activity of content initiators' Instagram accounts, both from feeds, stories, and netizen reactions contained in the comments column. From the research carried out, it can be concluded that this content is content that tries to balance the current Islamic da'wah scene which seems rigid and segmented, into a da'wah that is more open, flexible, fun, and can be felt by the wider community.

Pro-Kontra Normalisasi Hubungan Diplomatik Israel-Sudan Muhammad Bachrul Ulum
Jurnal ICMES Vol 5 No 1 (2021): Jurnal ICMES: The Journal of Middle East Studies
Publisher : Indonesia Center for Middle East Studies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35748/jurnalicmes.v5i1.102

In 2020, four Arab countries normalized relations with Israel, namely the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Bahrain, Sudan and Morocco. Sudan has been known as a country carrying hard-line Pan-Islamism during the reign of Omar Al-Bashir, so the normalization of relations with Israel is very surprising. Aim of this study is explaining the reasons behind Sudan's agreement to the normalization offer from the US. This study uses a qualitative method with a historical approach to trace the normalization causes and utilizes the concept of "national interest" in foreign policy. This study concludes that Sudan's willingness to normalize its relations with Israel is part of the country's efforts to get off the United States' list of State-Supported Terrorism. The Sudanese government has considered this status as a threat to their national interests, especially in the economic field.

PERIFRASA DALAM RETORIKA PRESIDEN MAHMOUD ABBAS (STUDI BALAGHAH PERSPEKTIF POLITIK) Muhammad Bachrul Ulum
Al Mi'yar: Jurnal Ilmiah Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab dan Kebahasaaraban VOL 4 NO. 2 Oktober 2021
Publisher : STIQ Amuntai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35931/am.v4i2.530

The strategy in rhetoric is a crucial ability that politicians must possess so that what is conveyed can be accepted by the public entirely and widely. This study will discuss how Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas devised a rhetorical strategy using Periphrases in his Speech at the 75th United Nations General Assembly to transfer his political message to the world. Precisely a few days after the announcement of the agreement to normalize diplomatic relations of the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Bahrain with Israel. Mahmoud Abbas is an accomplished diplomat who has succeeded in bringing Palestine to progressive achievements to gain recognition of sovereignty and political support from other countries. This study uses a qualitative method with a literature study model. The data collection method used the listening method with the free-talk listening technique (SBC) and the note-taking technique as an advanced method. The results of this study are that Mahmoud Abbas pours many political messages in the phrases he used when delivering the Speech, which was stated through Ithnab's functions based on social facts in Palestine.Keywords : Periphrase, rhetoric, politic, Mahmoud Abbas, Palestine

Tinjauan Tekstual Mufassir Nusantara tentang Perlindungan Hak-Hak Buruh di Indonesia Muhammad Bachrul Ulum
Islam Transformatif : Journal of Islamic Studies Vol 4, No 2 (2020): July - December 2020
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30983/it.v4i2.3612

This research discusses the local ulama's interpretation of the verses of the Qur'an, which textually supports the optimization of the fulfillment of the rights of workers in Indonesia. The mufassirs are Prof. Quraish Shihab, Shaykh Nawawi Al-Jawi, and KH. Bisri Musthofa. Mufassir Nusantara has a crucial role as a mediator between local communities who issue legal products and the Koran text, which is the absolute decree of Allah SWT to humanity. This includes being a figure capable of providing Quranic solutions to various prophetic problems in society, including labor. This research is a literature study. The methodology used in this research is a qualitative research method by trying to dissect Mufassir Nusantara's thoughts against the texts of the Al-Quran. The researcher found that the interpretation of the local Mufassir has relevance to the study of the text of the Al-Quran verses, which are used as the basis of arguments for the fulfillment of labor rights in Indonesia.Penelitian ini membahas penafsiran ulama nusantara terhadap ayat -ayat Al-Qur’an yang secara tekstualitas mendukung optimalisasi pemenuhan hak- hak kaum buruh di Indonesia. Para Mufassir tersebut adalah Prof. Quraish Shihab, Syaikh Nawawi Al-Jawi, dan KH. Bisri Musthofa. Mufassir Nusantara memiliki peran yang krusial sebagai mediator antara masyarakat lokal yang mengeluarkan produk hukum, dengan teks Al-Quran yang merupakan ketetapan absolut Allah SWT kepada umat manusia. Termasuk diantaranya menjadi tokoh yang mampu memberi solusi Qurany terhadap berbagai problem profetik masyarakat, diantaranya buruh. Penelitian ini merupakan studi pustaka. Metodologi yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian kualitatif, dengan mencoba membedah pemikiran Mufassir Nusantara terhadap teks -teks Al-Quran. Peneliti menemukan bahwa penafsiran Mufassir lokal memiliki relevansi terhadap studi teks ayat-ayat Al-Quran yang digunakan sebagai dasar argumentasi pemenuhan hak -hak buruh di Indonesia.

Tinjauan Tekstual Mufassir Nusantara tentang Perlindungan Hak-Hak Buruh di Indonesia Muhammad Bachrul Ulum
Islam Transformatif : Journal of Islamic Studies Vol 4, No 2 (2020): July - December 2020
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

This research discusses the local ulama's interpretation of the verses of the Qur'an, which textually supports the optimization of the fulfillment of the rights of workers in Indonesia. The mufassirs are Prof. Quraish Shihab, Shaykh Nawawi Al-Jawi, and KH. Bisri Musthofa. Mufassir Nusantara has a crucial role as a mediator between local communities who issue legal products and the Koran text, which is the absolute decree of Allah SWT to humanity. This includes being a figure capable of providing Quranic solutions to various prophetic problems in society, including labor. This research is a literature study. The methodology used in this research is a qualitative research method by trying to dissect Mufassir Nusantara's thoughts against the texts of the Al-Quran. The researcher found that the interpretation of the local Mufassir has relevance to the study of the text of the Al-Quran verses, which are used as the basis of arguments for the fulfillment of labor rights in Indonesia.Penelitian ini membahas penafsiran ulama nusantara terhadap ayat -ayat Al-Qur’an yang secara tekstualitas mendukung optimalisasi pemenuhan hak- hak kaum buruh di Indonesia. Para Mufassir tersebut adalah Prof. Quraish Shihab, Syaikh Nawawi Al-Jawi, dan KH. Bisri Musthofa. Mufassir Nusantara memiliki peran yang krusial sebagai mediator antara masyarakat lokal yang mengeluarkan produk hukum, dengan teks Al-Quran yang merupakan ketetapan absolut Allah SWT kepada umat manusia. Termasuk diantaranya menjadi tokoh yang mampu memberi solusi Qurany terhadap berbagai problem profetik masyarakat, diantaranya buruh. Penelitian ini merupakan studi pustaka. Metodologi yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian kualitatif, dengan mencoba membedah pemikiran Mufassir Nusantara terhadap teks -teks Al-Quran. Peneliti menemukan bahwa penafsiran Mufassir lokal memiliki relevansi terhadap studi teks ayat-ayat Al-Quran yang digunakan sebagai dasar argumentasi pemenuhan hak -hak buruh di Indonesia.

Plagiarisme dalam Dunia Puitika Arab Klasik: Studi Komparasi Pemikiran al-Jumahī dan al-Qairawānī Muhammad Bachrul Ulum
JILSA (Jurnal Ilmu Linguistik dan Sastra Arab) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022): Oktober
Publisher : Fakultas Adab dan Humaniora UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/jilsa.2022.6.2.136-150

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menyajikan interpretasi nyata studi kritik sastra terhadap praktik plagiarisme yang terjadi pada puisi Arab klasik. Al-Jumahi adalah orang yang membuka jalan bagi para kritikus untuk mengungkap pada public “kebusukan” dibalik kejayaan reputasi sastra Arab pada masa itu, sedangkan Al-Qairawany secara lebih sistematis menyajikan teori – teori yang berkaitan dengan hal tersebut. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif deskriptif dengan pendekatan analisis kontrastif terhadap dua karya besar mereka, yakni Ṭabaqāt Fuḥūl As-Syu´arā dan Al-‘Umdah fi Al-Maḥāsin li As-Syi’r Wa Adabihi Wa Naqdih. Hasil yang diperoleh adalah Al-Jumahi dan Al-Qairawany berangkat dari gagasan yang sama, kendati memiliki sudut pandang yang berbeda. Al-Jumahi berpendapat bahwa semua jenis peniruan merupakan tindak plagiarisme yang secara absolut tidak bisa diterima dalam dunia sastra. Sedangkan Al-Qairawany berpendapat bahwa selama yang ditiru bukanlah prinsip kreasi dan inovasi, maka hal tersebut masih bisa diterima sebagai karya sastra yang orisinil. Dari itu, terlihat perkembangan kritik yang signifikan pada masa Al-Jumahi dan Al-Qairawany.

Mahmoud Darwish’s Political Views After the Oslo Agreement in the Poetry “Khilaf Ghayru Lughawi, Ma’a Imri al-Qais”: A Semiotics Study Muhammad Bachrul Ulum
Journal of Arabic Language Studies and Teaching Vol. 1 No. 2 (2021): November 2021 / نوفمبر ٢٠٢١
Publisher : State Islamic University (UIN) of Sunan Ampel Surabaya, Indonesia

This study attempted to analyse Mahmoud Darwish’s political ideas in his book Khilaf Ghairu Lughawi Ma’a Imri’il Qais. He wrote the poem in 1995, two years after the signing of the Oslo Agreement. It was born out of Darwish’s disappointment with the political decision of the Palestine Liberation Organization, which he considered having neglected the priorities of the struggle for independence and territorial claims to the security of Palestinian refugees abroad. This study relied on the qualitative approach to get the intended research results. This study relied on the method of analysis by semiotic analysis of Michael Riffaterre. The results of this study are many uses of Darwish’s metaphorical expressions in his poem, as an irony for policymakers and people were considered deviants from the scale of national priority. His views embodied the disappointment of a political decision of the Palestine Liberation Organization from the hands of Yasser Arafat. He believed Arafat had included Israeli requirements and advantages in that agreement to facilitate the affairs of the Palestinians and the efforts of the victims of past wars.

PLAGIARISM IN CLASSIC ARABIC POETICS (COMPARATIVE STUDY OF AL-JUMAHI AND AL-QAIRAWANY’S THOUGHTS) Muhammad Bachrul Ulum
Center of Middle Eastern Studies (CMES) Vol 16, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Arabic Literature Department

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/cmes.16.1.53447

This research aims to present an interpretation of literary criticism on the occurrence of plagiarism in classical Arabic poetry. The topic of plagiarism, contrasted theoretically, has not been extensively discussed in previous studies. Al-Jumahi was the first to disclose the problematic aspects behind the outstanding reputation of Arab poetry. Conversely, Al-Qairawany presented related theories more systematically. This study employs a descriptive qualitative method using a contrastive approach towards the two major works of these figures, namely Thabaqat Fuhul As-Syuara and Al-Umdah fi Al-Mahasin li As-Syuara wa Adabihi wa Naqdih. The findings reveal that Al-Jumahi and Al-Qairawany start from the same premise, albeit from differing perspectives. Al-Jumahi contends that all forms of imitation are acts of plagiarism, entirely unacceptable in the literary world. On the other hand, Al-Qairawany asserts that if imitation does not compromise the principle of creation and innovation, it can still be accepted as original literary work. Consequently, there is a significant development from the criticism of the Al-Jumahi period to the Al-Qairawany period.

Title

Found 8 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 8 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 8 Documents
Search