Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM OF ISLAMIC BANKING AND LEGAL DISPUTE SETTLEMENT Akhmad Khisni
Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum Vol 5, No 2 (2018): Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum
Publisher : UNISSULA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26532/jph.v5i2.3109

Abstract

Islamic financial institutions in Indonesia are legalized in the governance of the banking law and in case of legal disputes become the absolute authority of the Religious Courts. Religious Courts readiness in responding to the development Islamic economics and resolve legal disputes are inevitable in the conduct of religious courts function as a legal institution, namely enforcement of certainty (juridical aspects) and justice (philosophical aspect), in addition to running the social aspects (sociological aspect). The position of Justice of religion as a social institution is dynamic, because of the exchange with the community dynamics that require the judge to explore, and understand the value of the law who live in the society. The implementation of Act No.3 of 2006 as amended by Act No. 50 Of 2009 regarding the Second Amendment to Act No.7 of 1989 concerning the Religious Courts, reinforced by Act No. 21 of 2008 concerning Islamic Banking. Institutional constraints faced by the Religious Court in handling cases Islamic economics is the law enforcement factors, factors of infrastructure, the judge in the religious courts appeared to be not effective due to the number of judges who have not been certified Islamic economy is still lacking, and the lack of educational and training of human resource development. In a more holistic approach to address the above problems, it is necessary reconstruction of the arrangement of the legal system and legal institutions and legal culture arrangement
PERCOBAAN PEMBUNUHAN SEBAGAI PENGHALANG HAK WARIS PERSPEKTIF HUKUM ISLAM DAN KOMPILASI HUKUM ISLAM Akhmad Khisni; M Ulinnuha
Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum Vol 3, No 2 (2016): Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum
Publisher : UNISSULA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26532/jph.v3i2.1447

Abstract

ABSTRACTIn terms of the obstruction of the right of inheritance for the crime of attempted murder of a conflict between Islamic Law and Islamic Law Compilation (KHI). In Islamic law, which was the cause of obstruction of the right of inheritance is someone for murder, slavery, religious differences, and different countries. In conditions that are not elements of the crime of attempted murder as the cause of obstruction of an inheritance. This provision departs from the principle of law in Islamic law regarding jarimah completed the murder and no jarimah / pending (attempted murder).On the other hand, clearly states KHI jarimah attempted murder is the element that causes obstruction of the right of inheritance as a provision contained in Article 173 KHI. Thus visible difference between the provisions of Islamic law and KHI, which has been placed as the provisions of Islamic law for the people of Indonesia. To address the problem, the authors use the research methods of law with juridical-normative legal research conducted by prioritizing research library materials or documents referred to secondary data, in the form of legal materials, primary and secondary. Specifications research is descriptive, which aims to give an overview conducted by way of qualitative theories of law and legal doctrine, and expert opinion of Islamic law.In conclusion, between Islamic law and there is no difference KHI opposite each other with respect to the legal principles adopted by each. The provisions in Article 173 KHI can be filed as a realization of the principles of Islamic law in the delivery of a legal provision will be enforced to have known it, or judge to determine the sentence for the crime ta'zir (jarimah). Conditions resulting known it, or judge it to be established in the form of a regulatory law that was born because of judicial decisions (jurisprudence), which in this case is the provision of an obstruction of the right of inheritance for reasons of criminal offenses of attempted murder.