Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.778
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal ILMU USHULUDDIN International Journal of Islamic Khazanah
Maisyatusy Syarifah
University of Malaya
Religion Humanities Education Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
THE SOLAR CIRCULATION CONCEPT: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF NICOLAUS COPERNICUS AND FAKHR AL-DĪN AL-RĀZĪ Maisyatusy Syarifah
ILMU USHULUDDIN Vol. 8, No. 2, December 2021
Publisher : Himpunan Peminat Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin (HIPIUS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/iu.v8i2.23449

Abstract

This paper highlights how the concept of solar circulation according to Nicolaus Copernicus in On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres Book and Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī in Tafsīr Mafātīḥ al-Ghayb about the concept of solar circulation, and how are the similarities and differences about according to both of them. The study shows that Nicolaus Copernicus and Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī agree that the sun is the center of the solar system, but they differ on three things, for example, Copernicus believes that the sun only stays in its orbit, while Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī convinced that the sun goes around the earth, and so on. This study is library research with the descriptive-analytical method and comparative approach. 
THE SOLAR CIRCULATION CONCEPT: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF NICOLAUS COPERNICUS AND FAKHR AL-DĪN AL-RĀZĪ Maisyatusy Syarifah
ILMU USHULUDDIN Vol. 8, No. 2, December 2021
Publisher : Peminat Ilmu Ushuluddin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/iu.v8i2.23449

Abstract

This paper highlights how the concept of solar circulation according to Nicolaus Copernicus in On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres Book and Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī in Tafsīr Mafātīḥ al-Ghayb about the concept of solar circulation, and how are the similarities and differences about according to both of them. The study shows that Nicolaus Copernicus and Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī agree that the sun is the center of the solar system, but they differ on three things, for example, Copernicus believes that the sun only stays in its orbit, while Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī convinced that the sun goes around the earth, and so on. This study is library research with the descriptive-analytical method and comparative approach. 
Pig Kidney Xenotransplantation as an Alternative Solution for Hifdz Al Nafs Hudzaifah Achmad Qotadah; Maisyatusy Syarifah
International Journal of Islamic Khazanah Vol. 12 No. 2 (2022): IJIK
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/ijik.v12i2.17358

Abstract

Recently, US surgeons successfully tested pig kidney transplants on a human patient, which surprised the medical community. This has elicited a range of responses, including among Muslim communities about whether it is permitted by Shariah or vice versa. Some Muslim scholars have stated that pigs are prohibited animals under Islamic law. In contrast, others saw this success as the most recent alternative treatment for kidney failure in recent history. This research examines the issue of transplanting pig kidneys into human bodies by maqasid al-syari'ah (hifdz al-nafs). The full qualitative method was employed based on library research to investigate the stated problems, and all the findings were analyzed descriptively. The study shows, first and foremost, that a pig is one kind of animal that is prohibited under Islamic law in any form. Two conditions must be fulfilled before the transplant of a pig's kidney into a human body can be justified: (1) it must be performed in an emergency where there is no alternative medicine or other sacred organs available; and (2) the harm resulting from the transplant itself must be less than the harm resulting from not performing the transplant. Thus, the transplantation of a pig's kidney into a human body is part of the hifdz al nafs effort to implement maqasid al dharuriyyat for the patient's survival. This study contributes to contemporary Islamic medical ethics by addressing a critical biomedical innovation rarely explored in classical jurisprudence.
Co-Authors Hudzaifah Achmad Qotadah