Ulin Nuha
Darus-Sunnah International Institute for Hadith Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Writing scientific interpretation between prohibition and leave | كتابة التفسير العلمي بين المنع والإجازة Ulin Nuha
Al-Zahra : Journal for Islamic and Arabic Studies Vol 14, No 2 (2017): AL-ZAHRÄ' JOURNAL FOR ISLAMIC AND ARABIC STUDIES
Publisher : Fakultas Dirasat Islamiyah, Univitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1174.604 KB) | DOI: 10.15408/zr.v14i2.10655

Abstract

This research aims to understand the method of scientific interpretationwhich was prepared by the Committee of Quranic Correction in the Ministry ofReligious Affairs of Indonesia. The used method is inductive method,particularly by collecting scientific data from the interpretation of theinterpretation, especially the scientific explanation. The researcher extracted hismethod from interpretation and extrapolation over the book.This research reveals that the definition of scientific interpretation is due tothe definition of general interpretation of the term, and then allocated in the senseand from which.
Investigation on Hadiths in al-Bayân al-Mulamma’ ‘an Alfâẕ al-Lam’ Written by Sahal Mahfudz | الاطلاع على أحاديث ((البيان الملمع عن ألفاظ اللمع)) للشيخ محمد أحمد سهل بن محفوظ الحاجيني Ulin Nuha
Al-Zahra : Journal for Islamic and Arabic Studies Vol 16, No 1 (2019): Al-Zahra: Journal for Islamic and Arabic Studies
Publisher : Fakultas Dirasat Islamiyah, Univitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1344.607 KB) | DOI: 10.15408/zr.v16i1.12196

Abstract

The book of al-Bayân al-Mulamma’ ‘an Alfâẕ al-Lam’ written by Sahal Mahfudz, one of the Nusantara’s Ulama, is the comments of the Imam Syairozi’s book, al-Lam’ fî Uṣûl al-Fiqh. In Sahal’s book, there is a number of hadith without mentioning conductors of takhrij (hadith extraction and authentication in the collections). Based on this, the activity of takhrij is an important matter.The study uses the method of the forefathers in the takhrij activity of the hadiths in this book, such as Ibn Kathir in Tuḥfah al-Ṯâlib bi Ma’rifah Aḥâdîts Mukhtaṣar Ibn al-Ḥâjib, and Ibnu Hajar in Muwâfaqah al-Khabar fî Takhrîj Aḥâdîts al-Mukhtaṣar, and Abdullah ibn Muhammad Al-Ghamari in Takhrîj Aḥâdîts al-Lam’. After tracking the hadiths from the original sources then ruled by former ulama’s rule. If a contradiction is found, tarjih will be applied.The findings show that 93% were found to be authentic (shahih), 6% were unreliable (dla’if), and 1% were not judged because the researcher did not find them. These unreliable hadiths have authentic ahadith al-bab strengthening them in terms of meaning.