Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Refleksi: Jurnal Kajian Agama dan Filsafat
Ahmad Ali
Raden Intan State Islamic Institute, Lampung
Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Ḥadīts Sebagai Ḥujjah Ḥukum dalam Perspektif Syī‘ah Ahmad Ali
Refleksi Vol 13, No 3 (2012): Refleksi
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (253.081 KB) | DOI: 10.15408/ref.v13i3.907

Abstract

This article shows that in the Shī‘ite (Shī‘a) madhhab (school) is different opinion concerning Ḥadīth/Sunna as ḥujja (allegation of law). One faction states that all aspects of the Prophet’s life are ḥujja, whilst another party claims that only some aspects of his life i.e. the aspect which connotes tashrī‘(law guidance) can be a ḥujja. In between these two sides, the most appropriate view point is the latter one, for it is more objective and proportional in looking at him as an ordinary human being, in one dimension, and as an apostle, in another one. The controversy then has enlarged into the ḥujja of ḥadīth/khabar al-āḥād. For some people, khabar al-āḥād is absolutely refused; another some admits it absolutely; while some receives it under certain prerequisites; and even a number of scholars accept it with the very tight and stiff requisites. In this context, again, the least group’s idea is more objective, logic and contextual. This conclusion is resulted from uṣūl al-fiqh approach and philosophical analysis.DOI: 10.15408/ref.v13i3.907
Ḥadīts Sebagai Ḥujjah Ḥukum dalam Perspektif Syī‘ah Ahmad Ali
Refleksi: Jurnal Kajian Agama dan Filsafat Vol 13, No 3 (2012): Refleksi
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/ref.v13i3.907

Abstract

This article shows that in the Shī‘ite (Shī‘a) madhhab (school) is different opinion concerning Ḥadīth/Sunna as ḥujja (allegation of law). One faction states that all aspects of the Prophet’s life are ḥujja, whilst another party claims that only some aspects of his life i.e. the aspect which connotes tashrī‘(law guidance) can be a ḥujja. In between these two sides, the most appropriate view point is the latter one, for it is more objective and proportional in looking at him as an ordinary human being, in one dimension, and as an apostle, in another one. The controversy then has enlarged into the ḥujja of ḥadīth/khabar al-āḥād. For some people, khabar al-āḥād is absolutely refused; another some admits it absolutely; while some receives it under certain prerequisites; and even a number of scholars accept it with the very tight and stiff requisites. In this context, again, the least group’s idea is more objective, logic and contextual. This conclusion is resulted from uṣūl al-fiqh approach and philosophical analysis.DOI: 10.15408/ref.v13i3.907
Co-Authors