Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jaqfi : Jurnal Aqidah dan Filsafat Islam Refleksi: Jurnal Filsafat dan Pemikiran Islam Fikrah: Jurnal Ilmu Aqidah dan Studi Keagamaan Al'Adalah
Muhammad Arif
UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
Religion Humanities Education Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
TAREKAT DAN KEMODERNAN: STUDI ATAS IKHWAN TAREKAT QADIRIYAH WA NAQSYABANDIYAH YOGYAKARTA Robby Habiba Abror; Muhammad Arif
Jaqfi: Jurnal Aqidah dan Filsafat Islam Vol 6, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Jurusan Aqidah dan Filsafat Islam Universitas Negri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (623.361 KB) | DOI: 10.15575/jaqfi.v6i1.11873

Abstract

AbstractMostly researchers of Muslim society had predicted that tarekat will slowly become extinct in Modern era. Yet, there are still many tarekats that exist in Modern era. In fact, they are always adapting to modernity, like Tarekat Qadiriyah wa Naqsyabandiyah (TQN) Yogyakarta. In the midst of modern society, TQN Yogyakarta is still exist and attract a lot of disciple. Examine the reality of the TQN's existence certainly interesting. Why TQN still exist in Modern society? What do tarekat members think about sufism and modernity? This article answers this question by interview TQN members and join some TQN activities and review some relevant literature. The result, TQN Yogyakarta is tarekat that live in the context of civilization. For TQN members, the relationship between sufism and modernity is not contradictory, but symbiotic mutualism, therefore a new religious style was created, that is the modern tarekat whose activities have a modern style.Keywords: TQN Yogyakarta, Tarekat, Modernity, and Sufism course AbstrakSebagian besar pengamat masyarakat Muslim meramalkan bahwa tarekat, akan sedikit demi sedikit punah dalam masyarakat modern. Namun, ternyata masih banyak tarekat-tarekat yang masih tetap eksis di era modern ini. Bahkan senantiasa beradabtasi dengan komodernan, seperti yang dilakukan oleh Tarekat Qadiriyah wa Naqsyabandiyah (TQN) di Yogyakarta. Di tengah masyarakat modern, ikhwan tarekat ini masih terus eksis dan cukup banyak menarik peminat. Realitas eksistensi TQN tersebut tentu menarik untuk dikaji lebih lanjut. Mengapa TQN tetap bertahan di tengah masyarakat modern Yogyakarta? Bagaimana pandangan ikhwan tarekat TQN Yogyakarta akan tasawuf dan kemodernan? Pertanyaan inilah yang diulas dalam artikel ini. Dalam menjawab pertanyaan tersebut penulis langsung menggali informasi lewat wawancara, ikut terlibat dalam kegiatan-kegiatan TQN, serta melakukan kajian literatur. Hasilnya, TQN Yogyakarta adalah tarekat yang hidup dalam historisitas kemanusiaan. Bagi para ikhawan TQN kolaborasi antara tarekat dan kemodernan bukanlah bersifat antagonis, melainkan simbiosis-mutualisme, sehingga tercipta suatu corak keagamaan baru, yaitu tarekat modern dengan kegiatan-kegiatan yang sarat nuasan kemodernan.Kata kunci: TQN Yogyakarta, Tarekat, Komedernan, Kursus Tasawuf.
KRITISISME KANT: RELEVANSINYA BAGI TEOLOGI ISLAM DAN KEMISKINAN Novian Widiadharma; Muhammad Arif
Refleksi: Jurnal Filsafat dan Pemikiran Keislaman Vol 16, No 1 (2016)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (4524.031 KB) | DOI: 10.14421/ref.2016.%x

Abstract

Poverty is the real phenomena within Indonesian Muslim communities. In order to be actual, Islamic Theology  should give the answer to this real problem within ummah i.e. the problem of poverty. The question is could the theology to answer the problem of poverty? This research tries to reflect to Criticism developed by Immanuel Kant. By its criticism Kant successfully answer the question whether the metaphysics  as a science  is possible? However finally Kant tends to reject the validity of the metaphysics as a science, he still accepts the principle of synthesis a priori as a mode of science. In order to make Islamic Theology discourses could answer the problem of poverty, the Islamic Theology should learn from Kant criticism project. The Islamic Theology should move from a priory approach to synthetic a priory approach. Because without the support of historical-empirical approach in the social sciences, the a priori-ahistoris character of lslamic Theology toward social facts will never able to answer the problem ofpoverty within Indonesian Muslim communities.
Al-Ghazali's Philosophical Theology and Its Relevance to the Polemic of Science and Islamic Theology During Pandemic Covid-19 Muh Fatkhan; Muhammad Arif
FIKRAH Vol 11, No 1 (2023): June 2023
Publisher : Prodi Aqidah dan Filsafat Islam, Fakultas Ushuluddin, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kudus

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21043/fikrah.v11i1.18646

Abstract

This article covers philosophical theology and its relevance to the issues between Islamic theology and science during Pandemic COVID-19. There were numerous scientific discoveries on covid-19 such as its contagion, the importance of physical distancing, the importance of wearing the mask, the importance of avoiding crowds, vaccines, etc. All of them have been public consumption. As a consequence, there was religious dissent in Muslim society. The one group took science on its side and negated any communal worship without health protocol. The other group chose “Islamic theology” and still conducted any communal worship without health protocol. To answer this reality, it is important to see how al-Ghazali handled philosophy and Islamic theology in harmony. Like al-Ghazali, Muslim society should respect scientific discoveries concerning the COVID-19 pandemic. However, not only appreciate the scientific discoveries but Muslim society also should keep in mind that the will and act of God are attached to the efforts of science to handle the COVID-19 pandemic.
INVESTIGATING THE INFLUENCE OF MUKTI ALI’S SCIENTIFIC-CUM-DOCTRINER ON AMIN ABDULLAH’S INTEGRATION-INTERCONNECTION IN ISLAMIC STUDIES Adhika Alvianto; Muhammad Arif; Rosi Islamiyati; Muhammad Harkim Novridho
Al'Adalah Vol. 26 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : LP2M IAIN Jember (now UIN Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35719/aladalah.v26i1.341

Abstract

Amin Abdullah's concepts of integration-interconnection and Mukti Ali's scientific-cum-doctriner have something in common. However, when developing his concept of integration-interconnection, Abdullah never quoted Ali's ideas, even though the relationship between the two thinkers and their thoughts was very close-as if the scientific-cum-doctriner concept was different from integration-interconnection. Abdullah prefers to cite the opinions of foreign thinkers, such as Ian G. Barbour, al-Jabiri, Nidhal Goessoum, and others when formulating integrations. Is it true that Abdullah tends to marginalize the conceptual role of Ali as his predecessor? Do the integration-interconnection and scientific-cum-doctor have nothing in common? This article investigates the influence and relationship of Ali's scientific-cum-doctriner thinking in Islamic studies in Indonesia. Abdullah admits that scientific-cum-doctriner is still at the level of method, not yet an approach, while integration-interconnection is already in the area of the approach. However, the two ideas have something in common. Both believed that one field of knowledge could not work independently, and both had the spirit to dialogue about the sciences, especially religious and other sciences.
Co-Authors Adhika Alvianto Muh Fatkhan Muhammad Harkim Novridho Novian Widiadharma Robby Habiba Abror Rosi Islamiyati