Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Yuridika
Johan Wahyudi
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
KAJIAN PENERAPAN ASAS ULTRA PETITA PADA PETITUM EX AEQUO ET BONO Bambang Sugeng Ariadi Subagyono; Johan Wahyudi; Razky Akbar
Yuridika Vol. 29 No. 1 (2014): Volume 29 No 1 Januari 2014
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (114.562 KB) | DOI: 10.20473/ydk.v29i1.360

Abstract

In judicial practice, that more than likely a lawsuit granted by the court , it often demands the principal ( the primary petition ) is accompanied by replacement demand ( petitum subsidiary ). The contents of the demands it usually reads : " ex aequo et bono " or " please take decisions based on fairness and propriety " . The goal is not to be denied that the primary demand is still possible granting of a lawsuit based on the freedom of judges and justice , in a decision handed down by the judge . Independence of judges in adjudicating the petition accompanied lawsuit subsidiary limited by a principle , namely that : a. Judge shall adjudicate all claims section ( vide Article 178 paragraph ( 2 ) and Article 189 paragraph HIR ( 2 ) Rbg ). b. Judge barred verdict on the case is not prosecuted or granted more than required ( vide Article 178 ( 3 ) HIR and Article 189 ( 3 ) Rbg ). This principle is sometimes called the principle of ultra petita the judge's decision, that in the application raises a particular problem when judges have ruled on the petition relating to the subsidiary, then the research we are doing to provide additional insight for all those who want to understand about the application of the principle in the imposition of ultra petita subsidiary petition or petition of ex aequo et bono.
PEMBATASAN UPAYA HUKUM PERKARA PERDATA GUNA MEWUJUDKAN ASAS PERADILAN SEDERHANA, CEPAT DAN BIAYA RINGAN Bambang Sugeng Ariadi S; Johan Wahyudi; Razky Akbar
Yuridika Vol. 30 No. 1 (2015): Volume 30 No 1 Januari 2015
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (314.967 KB) | DOI: 10.20473/ydk.v30i1.4875

Abstract

The most important thing for any regulation judicial principle is simple, fast and low cost is to reduce the accumulation of cases in the Supreme Court. That is because, line with the increasing increasing number of incoming cases, and also that successfully terminated in the District Court and Court of Appeal, then the incoming number of decisions in the Supreme Court also increased and began to be a serious problem. In this regard, People's Consultative Assembly (MPR) seriously consider this and responded by provisions, that is TAP MPR No. VIII/MPR/2000 about of the Annual Report of State High Institutions at the Annual Session of the People's Consultative Assembly of the Republic of Indonesia in 2000 which one substance recommend that the Supreme Court immediately resolve pending lawsuits by increasing the number and quality of decisions and that the Supreme Court makes the rules o restrict the entry of cassation cases. Following up on the existence of the MPR decrees, he Supreme Court has issued several provisions n order to limit legal action in order to realize judicial principle is simple, fast and low cost, either in the form of the Supreme Court Rules (Perma) nor Supreme Court Circular Letter (Sema). This article is useful for know and understand how much has been the implementation judicial principle is simple, fast and low cost, in order to reduce the buildup of civil cases. 
Co-Authors Bambang Sugeng Ariadi Subagyono Razky Akbar