Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Literasi Hukum Indonesian Journal of Law and Policy Studies Yuridika
Umar Haris Sanjaya
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
KEADILAN HUKUM PADA PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MEMUTUS HAK ASUH ANAK Umar Haris Sanjaya
Yuridika Vol. 30 No. 2 (2015): Volume 30 No 2 Mei 2015
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (305.874 KB) | DOI: 10.20473/ydk.v30i2.4653

Abstract

This reseach is focused on the making argument to looking justice progress of verdict. The justice progress which is mean is justice on the law of procedure. Law of justice is need to implemented by judge into the case as well as regulated in the Act. This research using context of problems as how the judges giving arguments of law into his verdict on the case of children custody and will continue with review it those verdict as well as law and justice consideration. Research result found three judges verdicts which are related with children custody on 2010. Those verdicts give a one of legal basic for three different consideration of verdict. 1st children custody give under mother, 2nd children custody give under father, 3rd children custody give to parents, its becaus of each party did not request specifically for children custody. For the conclusion overall judges use the law logic in the term of correct as well as legal basis. Its comply all of justice value to making verdict. Thus the justice which apply by judges is procedure justice eventhough those different in decision making.  
POTENTIAL LEGAL RISKS ARISING IN CASH ON DELIVERY (COD) PAYMENT MECHANISM IN E-COMMERCE APPLICATIONS Hanindita Kusumawardhani Arham; umar haris Sanjaya
Indonesian Journal of Law and Policy Studies Vol 3, No 1 (2022): Indonesian Journal of Law and Policy Studies
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31000/ijlp.v3i1.6305

Abstract

E-commerce is not only a place to promote goods and services but also for trading and payment.Cash on Delivery (COD) is a payment system in cash the moment the goods have arrived at buyers. The COD payment mechanism causes potential legal risks such as complaints from buyers because the goods that arrived do not match. This is detrimental to the shipping agent. High public interest in using COD payment system for online transactions poses potential risks for sellers, couriers, and buyers. In the COD payment system in e-commerce applications, sellers are often dishonest and commit fraud. Buyers often cancel unilaterally, causing losses for the seller and the courier. The e-commerce party will provide compensation for sellers who have been harmed.
PEMAKNAAN DISPARITAS PERKAWINAN PADA USIA ANAK UNDANG – UNDANG NOMOR 16 TAHUN 2019 DAN UNDANG – UNDANG NOMOR 35 TAHUN 2014 Tania Ariska Putri; Umar Haris Sanjaya
Literasi Hukum Vol 7, No 1 (2023): LITERASI HUKUM
Publisher : Universitas Tidar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 tentang Perkawinan menyebutkan pada Pasal 7 ayat (1) bahwasannya, perkawinan hanya diizinkan apabila pria dan wanita sudah mencapai usia 19 tahun. Selanjutnya, Pasal 7 ayat (2) yaitu apabila terjadinya penyimpangan terhadap ketentuan umur sebagaimana dijelaskan dalam Pasal (1), orang tua pihak pria maupun wanita dapat mengajukan dispensasi perkawinan kepada pengadilan dengan alasan mendesak disertai bukti pendukung yang cukup. Berdasarkan ketentuan Pasal 7 ayat (2) tersebut bertentangan dengan Pasal 26 ayat (1) huruf c Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 tentang Perlindungan Anak yang menjelaskan mengenai tanggung jawab orang tua untuk mencegah terjadinya perkawinan pada usia anak. Terdapat ketidaksesuaian pada kedua Undang-Undang tersebut, dalam Undang-Undang perlindungan anak orang tua berkewajiban mencegah terjadinya perkawinan pada usia anak sedangkan dalam Pasal 7 ayat (2) Undang-Undang perkawinan justru membuka peluang bagi orang tua untuk dapat menikahkan anaknya yang masih dibawah batas usia diperbolehkannya menikah tanpa melanggar aturan Negara.
Co-Authors Hanindita Kusumawardhani Arham Tania Ariska Putri