Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Yuridika
Sriti Hesti Astiti
Hakim Yustisial pada Mahkamah Agung RI
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA KURATOR BERDASARKAN PRINSIP INDEPENDENSI MENURUT HUKUM KEPAILITAN Sriti Hesti Astiti
Yuridika Vol. 31 No. 3 (2016): Volume 31 No 3 September 2016
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (316.248 KB) | DOI: 10.20473/ydk.v31i3.4794

Abstract

This article aimed to criticize the juridical basis of scope of crime mentioned on Law Number 37 of 2004, focuses on criminal responsibility of a curator based on independence principle of bankruptcy law. Essentially, bankruptcy is a part of civil law. However, some bankruptcy cases eventually evolve into criminal matters when a bankruptcy curator who is responsible in handling and administering bankruptcy case is positioned as defendant charged for conducting criminal acts. As stated on Article 234 Verse 2 of Law Number 37 of 2004, a curator who is proven not independent during bankruptcy court may be charged with criminal law. Criminal sanctions for non-independent curators aimed at preventing the curator from committing criminal acts in the course of the execution of the duty and maintenance tasks. Here, the role of criminal law is as a guardian of the norms that exist in the Law on Bankruptcy related to the duties and responsibilities of the curator. In order for a curator or committee before declaring his willingness to accept the duties and responsibilities of the consequences of the bankruptcy verdict or the postponement of the debt obligation obligation (PKPU) really ensure that he will not commit a disgraceful act of.
Co-Authors