Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal KERTHA WICAKSANA Yuridika
I Gusti Agung Mas Prabandari
Airlangga University
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Disclosure of Information in Environmental Documents in Supporting the Role of Public Monitoring I Made Gemet Dananjaya Suta; I Gusti Agung Mas Prabandari; Ni Luh Gede Astariyani
Yuridika Vol. 36 No. 2 (2021): Volume 36 No 2 May 2021
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (315.993 KB) | DOI: 10.20473/ydk.v36i2.24724

Abstract

The role of the community is important in realising the fulfilment of the right to a good and healthy environment as part of human rights. Lack of awareness of the disclosure of information in environmental documents to the public in surveilling activities or businesses that impact the environment is one of the many violations of environmental law resulting in environmental damage and pollution. This paper examines the importance of information disclosure in environmental documents in supporting the role of community oversight of activities that impact the environment. It used a normative legal research method with the statutory and conceptual approaches. This paper finds that the disclosure of information in environmental documents is important in optimising the role of public monitoring. Environmental documents are used as a guide for detailed information related to compliance with the implementation of activity on its terms and obligations. Such disclosure can be seen as the implementation of the right to access information in support of community responsibility, guaranteeing and fulfilling the right to a good and healthy environment as a human right so that environmental damage and pollution from activities that are illegal and/or violate environmental permits can be controlled and prevented.
Enforcement of the Non-Retroactive Principle in the Bali Bombing Case I in the Constitutional Court of Indonesia Decision Number 013 / PUU-I / 2003 I Made Gemet Dananjaya Suta; I Gusti Agung Mas Prabandari; Ida Ayu Agung Saraswati
KERTHA WICAKSANA Vol. 15 No. 2 (2021)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/kw.15.2.2021.108-115

Abstract

Penerapan asas retroaktif pada kasus bom Bali I berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2003 dimaksudkan untuk memberikan rasa keadilan kepada masyarakat, namun uji materil atas penerapan norma retroaktif tersebut dinilai inkonstitusional oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi melalui keputusan nomor 013/PUU-I/2003. Pro dan kontra dari putusan tersebut terjadi di masyarakat, antara menegakkan kepastian hukum atau memenuhi rasa keadilan bagi para korban. Tulisan ini berupaya mengkaji putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 013/UU-I/2003 dengan memaparkan pertimbangan hukum MK dalam memutus perkara tersebut. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Tulisan ini menyimpulkan bahwa asas nonretroaktif merupakan asas yang mutlak harus ditegakkan karena merupakan salah satu asas yang menjamin perlindungan hak asasi manusia yang tidak dapat dikurangi dalam keadaan apapun.
Co-Authors I Made Gemet Dananjaya Suta I Made Gemet Dananjaya Suta Ida Ayu Agung Saraswati Ni Luh Gede Astariyani