Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Penerapan UNCLOS 1982 dalam Ketentuan Perundang-undangan Nasional, Khususnya Zona Ekonomi Eksklusif Indonesia Ida Kurnia
Jurnal Hukum PRIORIS Vol. 2 No. 1 (2008): Jurnal Hukum Prioris Volume 2 Nomor 1 Tahun 2008
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Trisakti University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1512.447 KB) | DOI: 10.25105/prio.v2i1.325

Abstract

Sebelum Indonesia meratifikasi UNCLOS 1982, Indonesia telah mempunyai aturan dalam hukum nasionalnya yang mengatur tentang zona ekonmi eksklusif, yaitu Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1983 tentang Zona Ekonomi Eksklusif Indonesia. Kemudian Indonesia pada tahun 1985 baru melakukan tindakan ratifikasi. Hal ini berarti sebelum tindakan ini dilakukan, maka Indonesia harus melihat aturan-aturan hukum nasional dan menyelaraskannya dengan UNCLOS 1982 tersebut. Dengan telah diratifikasinya UNCLOS 1982 dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 1985 telah menjadikan Undang-Undang Nomor 5 tahun 1983 yang mengatur Zona Ekonomi Eksklusif Indonesia dapat diterapkan dalam lingkup internsional, karena undang-undang tersebut sudah sesuai dengan UNCLOS 1982.
Legal Consequences Of The Icj's Decision In The Nicaragua V. Colombia Case On The Pact Of Bogota Alvina Alvina; Ida Kurnia
Cakrawala Repositori IMWI Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): Cakrawala Repositori IMWI
Publisher : Institut Manajemen Wiyata Indonesia & Asosiasi Peneliti Manajemen Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52851/cakrawala.v6i1.255

Abstract

International agreements in the practice of diplomatic relations are an important aspect. Where in its implementation, the role of international agreements in international law is based on the fact that international law mostly consists of international treaties. One example of an international treaties is the Pact of Bogota. The Pact of Bogota is the United States Agreement on the Settlement of the Pacific region signed by the independent American republics that gathered at the Ninth International Conference of American States in Bogota, Colombia. One of the member countries of this pact is Nicaragua and Colombia. The International Court of Justice from November 19, 2012, based on the Pact of Bogota agreement. The issue raised by the author is related to the decision of the international court in deciding cases between Nicaragua and Colombia based on the Pact of Bogota with the consideration that Colombia had withdrawn from the Pact of Bogota before Nicaragua filed a lawsuit to the International Court of Justice, namely on November 27, 2012.
Legal Consequences Of The Icj's Decision In The Nicaragua V. Colombia Case On The Pact Of Bogota Alvina Alvina; Ida Kurnia
Cakrawala Repositori IMWI Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): Cakrawala Repositori IMWI
Publisher : Institut Manajemen Wiyata Indonesia & Asosiasi Peneliti Manajemen Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52851/cakrawala.v6i1.255

Abstract

International agreements in the practice of diplomatic relations are an important aspect. Where in its implementation, the role of international agreements in international law is based on the fact that international law mostly consists of international treaties. One example of an international treaties is the Pact of Bogota. The Pact of Bogota is the United States Agreement on the Settlement of the Pacific region signed by the independent American republics that gathered at the Ninth International Conference of American States in Bogota, Colombia. One of the member countries of this pact is Nicaragua and Colombia. The International Court of Justice from November 19, 2012, based on the Pact of Bogota agreement. The issue raised by the author is related to the decision of the international court in deciding cases between Nicaragua and Colombia based on the Pact of Bogota with the consideration that Colombia had withdrawn from the Pact of Bogota before Nicaragua filed a lawsuit to the International Court of Justice, namely on November 27, 2012.