Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal eCo-Fin Media Riset Akuntansi Auditing & Informasi
Khomsiyah Khomsiyah
Trisakti University
Economics, Econometrics & Finance

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Analysis of Effect of Power Distance, Power Avoidance, Individualism, Masculinity and Time Orientation Toward Auditing Behavior with Mediation of Locus of Control Limajatini Limajatini; Etty Murwaningsari; Khomsiyah Khomsiyah
eCo-Fin Vol 1 No 1 (2019): Report Assigment
Publisher : Komunitas Dosen Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (335.669 KB) | DOI: 10.32877/ef.v1i1.53

Abstract

The occurrence of financial scandals have been concerned by many public accountants to provide more ethical awareness to work ethically. In the task of auditing, public accountants are often faced with ethical dilemmas caused auditing conflict. This study focused on the effect of locus of control and how public accountants and auditors aware the effect toward their auditing behavior. We used causal and descriptive research design to measure the effects of cultural, ethical behavior among accountants and auditors with moderation of locus of control. Our study results showed that, firstly, power distance between the auditors and accountants will affect their ethical behavior in the work. Secondly, the avoidance of uncertainty among the auditors will affect their ethical behavior toward accountants. Thirdly, the attitude of individualism among the auditors and accountants also will affect their ethical behavior in auditing tasks. The attitude of masculinity also impacted on their ethical behavior to fulfill the auditing tasks. Time orientation has more significant result which impacting their ethical behavior. Finally, Locus of control can strengthening the power distance and ethical conduct among accountants and auditors. This study contributed to expand the auditing knowledge and the factors that impact on their ethical behavior in auditing tasks.
DO GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE (GCG) AND INTEGRATED CORPORATE GOVERNANCE (ICG) IMPROVE PERFORMANCE AND REDUCE FRAUD IN INDONESIAN PUBLIC BANKING? Tugiantro Tugiantoro; Khomsiyah Khomsiyah; Ari Purwanti
Media Riset Akuntansi, Auditing & Informasi Vol. 22 No. 1 (2022): April
Publisher : LEMBAGA PENERBIT FAKULTAS EKONOMI DAN BISNIS UNIVERSITAS TRISAKTI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (702.105 KB) | DOI: 10.25105/mraai.v22i1.12953

Abstract

Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menguji apakah penerapan GCG dan ICG meningkatkan kinerja dan mengurangi fraud pada perbankan umum di Indonesia dengan menggunakan Asset Quality sebagai variabel moderasi. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kausalitas dengan sampel 27 bank pada periode 2015-2018. GCG dan ICG dinilai menggunakan analisis isi atas pengungkapan yang tersedia dalam laporan tahunan bank. Kinerja diukur dari kinerja saham dan kinerja keuangan. Fraud diukur berdasarkan Beneish M. Score (2009) menggunakan 5 (lima) indeks yang mengukur DSRI, GMI, AQI, SGI, dan TATA. Model Persamaan Struktural Partial-Least Square (PLS-SEM) digunakan dalam pengujian model penelitian. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa GCG berpengaruh positif terhadap Kinerja Saham, dan Kinerja Keuangan serta berpengaruh negatif terhadap Fraud. Sedangkan ICG berpengaruh positif terhadap Kinerja Saham, dan Kinerja Keuangan, namun tidak berpengaruh terhadap Fraud. Variabel kontrol Leverage (Lev) berpengaruh negatif terhadap Kinerja Saham, Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) berpengaruh positif terhadap Kinerja Keuangan, dan Loan to Deposit Ratio (LDR) berpengaruh positif terhadap Fraud. Kualitas Aset sebagai variabel pemoderasi dapat memperkuat pengaruh GCG terhadap Kinerja Keuangan dan Fraud. Hal ini juga dapat memperkuat pengaruh ICG terhadap Kinerja Keuangan. Namun variabel pemoderasi Kualitas Aset tidak memperkuat pengaruh GCG terhadap Kinerja Saham, juga tidak memperkuat pengaruh ICG terhadap Kinerja Saham dan Fraud. Pada F-Test, GCG dan ICG secara simultan berpengaruh terhadap Kinerja Saham, Kinerja Keuangan, dan Fraud.   The purpose of this study is to examine whether the implementation of GCG and ICG increase performance and reduce fraud on public banking in Indonesia while using Asset Quality as a moderating variable. This study is a causality study with 27 banks as samples on the period of 2015-2018. GCG and ICG assessed using content analysis on disclosures that are available in the bank's annual report. Performance is measured from stock performance and financial performance. Fraud is measured based on Beneish M. Score (2009) using the 5 (five) indexes measuring DSRI, GMI, AQI, SGI, and TATA. Partial-Least Square Structural Equation Model (PLS-SEM) was used in testing the study model. The result of this study showed that the GCG impact positively on the Stock Performance, and Financial Performance and impact negatively on Fraud. ICG on the other hand impact positively on Stock Performance, and Financial Performance, however, there is no influence against Fraud. The control variable Leverage (Lev) shows a negative influence on Stock Performance, the Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) shows a positive influence on Financial Performance, and the Loan to Deposit Ratio (LDR) shows a positive influence on Fraud. Asset Quality as a moderating variable can strengthen the influence of GCG on Financial Performance and Fraud. It can also strengthen the influence of ICG on Financial Performance. However, the moderating variable Asset Quality did not strengthen the influence of GCG on Stock Performance, nor did it strengthen the influence of ICG on Stock Performance and Fraud. In F-Test, GCG and ICG were simultaneously affecting the Stock Performance, Financial Performance, and Fraud.
Co-Authors Ari Purwanti Etty Murwaningsari Limajatini Limajatini Tugiantro Tugiantoro