Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 7 Documents
Search

KAJIAN HUKUM MENGENAI PENGANGKATAN HAKIM KONSTITUSI OLEH PRESIDEN DITINJAU DARI PRINSIP TRANSPARANSI DAN PARTISIPASI Sabungan Sibarani
PROSIDING SEMINAR NASIONAL CENDEKIAWAN PROSIDING SEMINAR NASIONAL CENDEKIAWAN 2018 BUKU II
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/semnas.v0i0.3495

Abstract

The appointment mechanism of the Constitutional Court Judge is different from that of an ordinary judge or Supreme Court Justices, Constitutional Court Judges totaling nine persons consisting of three persons elected by the People's Legislative Assembly, three elected by the President, and three by the Supreme Court. Where in this case, the nomination of Constitutional Justices is conducted in a transparent and participative manner, meaning that in the process of selecting Constitutional Justices, it must be conducted through a transparent selection process and involves the active participation of the community. The President is authorized to propose three judges of the composition of nine Constitutional Judges and is the prerogative of the President of the proposed nominee. The appointment mechanism and recruitment system of candidates for Constitution Justice by the President should be as mandated by Article 19 of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 8 Year 2011 on Amendment to Law Number 24 Year 2003 regarding Constitutional Court which must fulfill the principles of transparency and participation. In addition, the Government should make clearer rules on the appointment mechanism of Constitutional Justices especially regarding internal selection to be more transparent.
SUMBANGSIH HASIL PENELITIAN DAN PENGEMBANGAN UNTUK INDONESIA LEBIH BAIK Sabungan Sibarani
PROSIDING SEMINAR NASIONAL CENDEKIAWAN PROSIDING SEMINAR NASIONAL CENDEKIAWAN 2019 BUKU II
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/semnas.v0i0.5864

Abstract

One form of evaluation that can be done to determine the contribution of an institution in conducting research activities is to measure the productivity of researchers through scientific publications. Publication productivity or also called research output or research productivity is one indicator of research performance or research performance. A researcher is said to have high productivity if many researchers produce scientific papers and are published in scientific journals. Contribution of research and development results is also intended for a better Indonesia. And without fail, it is also important to have input in making policies for publication of publications, as well as research planning, including providing the latest sources of information in research and development.
ANALISIS HUKUM MENGENAI PENCABUTAN HAK POLITIK BAGI KORUPTOR BERDASARKAN SUDUT PANDANG HAK ASASI MANUSIA Sabungan Sibarani
Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pakar Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pakar 2019 buku II
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/pakar.v0i0.4378

Abstract

Revocation of political rights for convicted corruption cases in the perspective of human rights, where political rights are part of human rights, therefore if there is revocation of political rights which are part of an additional criminal application, there must be a limitation on the revocation of rights. The application of additional penalties in the form of revoking the right to vote and be elected (political rights) insofar as it is not permanent does not violate human rights. Limitation or limitation began to take effect, or in other words began to be counted on the convicts who served an additional sentence revoked political rights. The right to hold office, the right to vote and be elected Article 35 of the Criminal Code, also overlaps with the decision of the Constitutional Court (Constitutional Court). Article 38 of the Criminal Code determines "revocation of rights shall take effect on the day the court decision begins to be carried out." While the Constitutional Court decision No. 4/PUUVII/2009 has determined that the penalty for revocation of political rights is considered constitutional with the limitation of rights only up to five years after the convict has finished carrying out his sentence.
ASPEK PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM PASIEN KORBAN MALPRAKTIK DILIHAT DARI SUDUT PANDANG HUKUM DI INDONESIA Sabungan Sibarani
Justitia et Pax Vol. 33 No. 1 (2017): Justitia Et Pax Volume 33 Nomor 1 Tahun 2017
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v33i1.1417

Abstract

Malpractice case is a criminal offense that is very common in Indonesia. Malpractice is essentially an action of the professional personnel which is contrary to the standard operating procedure (SOP), the code of ethics, and the laws that apply, whether intentional or due to negligence that resulted in harm or death to others. The aspects of legal protection towards the patients as the victims of malpractice by a doctor under the laws of Indonesia are namely: (1) in a preventive manner: using the regulations that govern the malpractice actions, namely in the Book of the Law of Civil Law (Civil Code), Act on Health, Law Consumer protection Law Medical Practice and the Penal Code, and (2) in a repressive manner: the existence of action that resulted in a loss, the person who performed the action shall be imposed sanctions in the form of civil sanctions, namely by giving compensation, either administrative sanction and criminal sanction. Keywords: Legal Protection, Patient, Malpractice Victims. INTISARI Kasus malpraktik merupakan tindak pidana yang sangat sering terjadi di Indonesia. Malpraktik pada dasarnya adalah tindakan tenaga profesional yang bertentangan dengan standard operating procedure (SOP), kode etik, dan undang-undang yang berlaku, baik disengaja maupun akibat kelalaian yang mengakibatkan kerugian atau kematian pada orang lain.       Aspek perlindungan hukum terhadap pasien korban malpraktik oleh dokter berdasarkan hukum Indonesia, yaitu: (1) secara preventif: dengan adanya peraturan-peraturan yang mengatur mengenai tindakan malpraktik, yaitu dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUH Perdata), Undang-Undang Kesehatan, Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen, Undang-Undang Praktik Kedokteran, dan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP), (2) dan secara represif: dengan adanya tindakan yang mengakibatkan kerugian, maka seseorang yang melakukan tindakan tersebut dijatuhkan sanksi berupa sanksi perdata, yaitu dengan mengganti kerugian, baik sanksi administratif dan sanksi pidana.  Kata Kunci: Perlindungan Hukum, Pasien, Korban Malpraktik. 
PENERAPAN LEGITIME PORTIE (BAGIAN MUTLAK) DALAM PEMBAGIAN WARIS MENURUT KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PERDATA (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR 320/PDT/G/2013/PN.JKT.BAR) SABUNGAN SIBARANI
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 6, No 2 (2017)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (108.154 KB) | DOI: 10.30652/jih.v5i2.3594

Abstract

Pelaksanaan pengaturan pemindahan kekayaan (warisan) dari orang yang telah meninggal dan akibat pemindahan ini bagi orang-orang yang memperolehnya, baik dalam hubungan antara mereka dengan pihak ketiga berdasarkan hukum waris barat diatur dalam Burgerlijk Wetboek (BW) atau KUHPerdata. Data penelitian memperlihatkan bahwa wasiat yang dibuat Almarhumah Ny. Soeprapti adalah tidak sesuai dengan Pasal 913 KUHPerdata, karena hanya 1 (satu) orang anak saja yang dapat harta warisan, sehingga garis lurus ke bawah tidak dapat perlindungan hukum. Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Barat Nomor 320/Pdt/G/2013/PN. Jkt.Bar yang menyatakan bahwa Penggugat dan Tergugat adalah ahli waris dari almarhumah Ny. Soeprapti sudah sesuai dengan Pasal 913 KUHPerdata yaitu “legitime portie atau bagian warisan menurut undang-undang ialah bagian dan harta benda yang harus diberikan kepada para ahli waris dalam garis lurus menurut undang-undang, yang terhadapnya orang yang meninggal dunia tidak boleh menetapkan sesuatu, baik sebagai hibah antara orang-orang yang masih hidup, maupun sebagai wasiat.”
Legal Protection Aspects Of Malpractice Victims Based Legal View In Indonesia Sabungan Sibarani; Nomensen Sinamo
Proceeding International Conference Of Innovation Science, Technology, Education, Children And Health Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022): Proceeding of The International Conference of Inovation, Science, Technology, E
Publisher : Program Studi DIII Rekam Medis dan Informasi Kesehatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/icistech.v2i1.39

Abstract

Malpractice cases are a crime that is very common in Indonesia. Malpractice is basically an act of a professional that is contrary to standard operating procedures (SOP), code of ethics, and applicable laws, whether intentional or as a result of negligence that results in loss or death to others. Aspects of legal protection for patients who are victims of malpractice by doctors based on Indonesian law, namely : preventively with the existence of regulations governing malpractice, namely in the Civil Code (KUH Perdata), the Health Law, the Consumer Protection Law, the Medical Practice Law, and the Legal Code, Penal (Penal Code) and repressively the lack of action resulted in a loss, the person who performed the action imposed sanctions in the form of civil sanctions, namely to compensate both the administrator sanctions and criminal sanctions.
Legal Protection Aspects Of Malpractice Victims Based Legal View In Indonesia Sabungan Sibarani; Nomensen Sinamo
Proceeding International Conference Of Innovation Science, Technology, Education, Children And Health Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022): Proceeding of The International Conference of Inovation, Science, Technology, E
Publisher : Program Studi DIII Rekam Medis dan Informasi Kesehatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/icistech.v2i1.39

Abstract

Malpractice cases are a crime that is very common in Indonesia. Malpractice is basically an act of a professional that is contrary to standard operating procedures (SOP), code of ethics, and applicable laws, whether intentional or as a result of negligence that results in loss or death to others. Aspects of legal protection for patients who are victims of malpractice by doctors based on Indonesian law, namely : preventively with the existence of regulations governing malpractice, namely in the Civil Code (KUH Perdata), the Health Law, the Consumer Protection Law, the Medical Practice Law, and the Legal Code, Penal (Penal Code) and repressively the lack of action resulted in a loss, the person who performed the action imposed sanctions in the form of civil sanctions, namely to compensate both the administrator sanctions and criminal sanctions.