Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

PENGARUH MOTIVASI BELANJA UTILITARIAN TERHADAP KEPUTUSAN PEMBELIAN DI PASAR MODERN (STUDI PADA PELANGGAN GIANT SUPERMARKET DAERAH DINOYO KOTA MALANG) Winda Ariria Eka Prawita; Ahmad Sudiro
Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa FEB Vol 2, No 1: Semester Ganjil 2013/2014
Publisher : Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (338.475 KB)

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh secara simultan dan parsial atas motivasi belanja utilitarian yang terdiri dari dua variabel yaitu (1) kualitas barang dan (2) kualitas layanan terhadap keputusna pembelian di pasar modern Giant yang berada di daerah Dinoyo Kota Malang.  Penelitian ini menjelaskan hubungan dan pengaruh variabel bebas yaitu kualitas barang dan kualitas layanan terhadap keputusan konsumen dalam melakukan keputusan pembelian di pasar modern Giant yang berada di daerah Dinoyo Kota Malang.  Penelitian ini menggunakan sampel sebanyak 50 orang. Sedangkan pengambilan sampel menggunakan teknik  non-probability sampling. Uji yang digunakan dalam menguji instrument penelitian ini adalah uji validitas, uji reliabilitas, dan uji asumsi klasik. Uji hipotesis menggunakan uji F hitung dan t hitung. Untuk menganalisis data digunakan uji regresi linear berganda dan uji asumsi klasik yaitu uji normalitas, uji multikolinearitas,  dan uji heteroskesdastisitas.  Dari hasil analisis terlihat bahwa kedua variabel berpengaruh secara simultan terhadap keputusan konsumen dalam melakukan pembelian di pasar modern Giant yang berada di daerah Dinoyo Kota Malang. Sedangkan secara parsial kedua  variabel berpengaruh secara signifikan terhadap keputusan konsumen dalam melakukan pembelian di pasar modern Giant yang berada di daerah Dinoyo Kota Malang.  Kata Kunci: Motivasi Belanja Utilitarian, Kualitas Barang, Kualitas Layanan, Keputusan Pembelian Di Pasar Modern Giant Dinoyo Kota Malang
PERLINDUNGAN HAK BAGI PELAKU USAHA MASKAPAI PENERBANGAN SESUAI DENGAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 8 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI NO. 10/PDT.SUS-BPSK/2016/PN.JKT.BRT JO. PUTUSAN BPSK NO. 006/A/BPSK-DKI/XII/2015) Viola Monica; Ahmad Sudiro
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 4, No 1 (2021): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v4i1.12022

Abstract

The Airline has the obligation to compensate for losses suffered due to damage or loss of consumer goods. However, based on the applicable laws and regulations, not all damage or loss of items in the aircraft baggage is borne by the airline service provider. This study aims to describe the responsibilities that must be borne by airlines based on Law No.8 of 1999 concerning consumer protection and Law No.1 of 2009 concerning aviation and also to see the protection of the rights of airlines in the BPSK Decision No. 006 / A / BPSK-DKI / XII / 2015. This study uses the normative method and uses a library study of aviation-related statutory documents and interviews with related parties. The result of this research is that compensation is given if checked baggage, namely the baggage given to the airline at check-in is lost or damaged, while for cabin baggage where the goods carried by the consumer are not covered by the company. From the BPSK's decision in the Leo Christoffel case, Qatar Airways as an airline has suffered a lot because it is asked to bear half of the losses suffered by consumers. This is clearly not in accordance with the flight law where lost in cabin baggage will not be compensated by the airline.
Trademark Sales Study as Boedel Bankrupt by the Curator Aldy Wicaksono; Ahmad Sudiro
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v5i2.1085

Abstract

Trademarks are included in the Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) regime in Indonesia because trademark rights are always attached to economic rights. This study uses a normative method by collecting secondary data. Qualitative analysis was carried out on secondary data to obtain conclusions about the Nyonya Meneer brand as an intangible asset owned by PT Nyonya Meneer which is bankrupt based on the Commercial Court Decision. As a result of the law of PT Nyonya Meneer being bankrupt, the Curator carried out the settlement and management of the bankrupt estate including the Nyonya Meneer brand by auction through private sales with an appraisal value of Rp. 200 billion to Rp. 10.25 billion. It is hoped that the government will make a regulation related to the valuation regulations for IPR as well as regulations related to the transfer of IPR as bankrupt assets and create a special appraisal institution to provide legal certainty for the curator in carrying out his duties and authorities.
Trademark Sales Study as Boedel Bankrupt by the Curator Aldy Wicaksono; Ahmad Sudiro
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v5i2.1085

Abstract

Trademarks are included in the Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) regime in Indonesia because trademark rights are always attached to economic rights. This study uses a normative method by collecting secondary data. Qualitative analysis was carried out on secondary data to obtain conclusions about the Nyonya Meneer brand as an intangible asset owned by PT Nyonya Meneer which is bankrupt based on the Commercial Court Decision. As a result of the law of PT Nyonya Meneer being bankrupt, the Curator carried out the settlement and management of the bankrupt estate including the Nyonya Meneer brand by auction through private sales with an appraisal value of Rp. 200 billion to Rp. 10.25 billion. It is hoped that the government will make a regulation related to the valuation regulations for IPR as well as regulations related to the transfer of IPR as bankrupt assets and create a special appraisal institution to provide legal certainty for the curator in carrying out his duties and authorities.