Dian Dewi Khasanah
National Land College, Yogyakarta

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Analisis Yuridis Kekuatan Hukum Sertipikat Tanah Elektronik Dalam Pembuktian Hukum Acara Perdata Dian Dewi Khasanah
Widya Bhumi Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021): Widya Bhumi
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Pertanahan Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (264.66 KB) | DOI: 10.31292/wb.v1i1.5

Abstract

The role of electronic evidence, namely electronic certificates as part of electronic documents in civil cases, is still questionable. The presence of the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, which is the legal umbrella for the validity of electronic certificates, apparently still raises pros and cons, even in the eyes of law enforcers, therefore more specific regulations are needed so that the validity and strength of proof of electronic certificates are no longer questioned in court proceedings, especially civil cases. Electronic certificate or also known as electronic land certificate as one of the products from The Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency which is currently being discussed will implement a media transfer process from analog to digital form. For this reason, it is necessary to prepare further regarding regulations to regulate how the later position and strength of evidence from electronic land certificates in Civil Procedure Law as an extension of evidence in civil cases. The method used in writing this scientific paper is legal research with the socio-legal method, namely by normatively examining the regulations regarding the Information dan Electronic Transaction of law in which have been used in civil proceedings in court and by looking at the existing norms and responses that are developing in the community. In the provisions of Article 6 of the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, an electronic document is considered valid if it is accessible, displayable, assured as to its integrity, and accountable. However, because it does not have perfect evidentiary power, it is necessary to accelerate the discussion of the Draft Civil Procedure Law, so that electronic land certificates as part of electronic documents have perfect evidentiary power in court, especially in civil cases.Keywords: Electronic Land Certificate, Evidence, Civil Procedure Law Intisari: Peran alat bukti elektronik yaitu sertipikat elektronik sebagai bagian dari dokumen elektronik dalam perkara perdata sampai saat ini masih dipertanyakan keabsahannya. Kehadiran UU ITE yang menjadi payung hukum dari keabsahan sertipikat elektronik rupanya masih menimbulkan pro dan kontra, bah­kan di mata penegak hukum, oleh karenanya dibutuhkan regulasi yang lebih spesifik agar keab­sahan dan kekuatan pembuktian dari sertipikat elektronik tidak lagi dipertanyakan dalam beracara di pengadilan khususnya perkara perdata. Sertipikat elektronik atau dapat juga disebut sertipikat tanah elektronik sebagai salah satu produk dari Kementerian Agraria dan Tata Ruang/ Badan Pertanahan Nasional (ATR/BPN) yang saat ini sedang diwacanakan akan diberlakukan atau akan dilaksanakan proses alih media dari bentuk analog ke bentuk digital. Untuk itu perlu dipersiapkan lebih lanjut menge­nai regulasi untuk mengatur bagaimana nantinya kedudukan dan kekuatan pembuktian dari sertipikat tanah elektronik dalam Hukum Acara Perdata sebagai perluasan alat bukti pada perkara perdata. Metode yang digunakan dalam penulisan karya ilmiah ini adalah penelitian hukum dengan metode sosio legal, yaitu dengan mengkaji secara yuridis normatif berbagai ketentuan perundang-undangan dan pengaturan mengenai dokumen elektronik yang selama ini dapat digunakan dalam beracara secara perdata di pengadilan serta dengan melihat norma dan respon yang ada dan berkem­bang di tengah masyarakat. Dalam ketentuan Pasal 6 UU ITE, suatu dokumen elektronik dianggap sah apabila dapat diakses, ditampilkan, dijamin keutuhannya, dan dapat dipertanggungjawabkan. Namun karena belum memiliki kekuatan pembuktian yang sempurna, maka perlu segera dipercepat pemba­hasan mengenai Rancangan Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Perdata, agar sertipikat tanah elektronik sebagai bagian dari dokumen elektronik memiliki kekuatan pembuktian yang sempurna di muka pengadilan khususnya perkara perdata.Kata Kunci: Sertipikat Tanah Elektronik, Pembuktian, Hukum Acara Perdata
Analisis Yuridis Akibat dari Musnahnya Obyek Jaminan yang Dilekati Hak Tanggungan Karena Bencana Alam Dian Dewi Khasanah; Alfons Alfons
Widya Bhumi Vol. 1 No. 2 (2021): Widya Bhumi
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Pertanahan Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (991.175 KB) | DOI: 10.31292/wb.v1i2.15

Abstract

ABSTRACT The event of the destruction of the object of the Mortgage Rights due to a natural disaster which is a force majeure or overmacht, the occurrence of which cannot be predicted or controlled by the parties in the Mortgage Agreement, is not specifically regulated in the Mortgage Law or other regulations. The absence of clear rules regarding the destruction of mortgage objects causes no legal protection for the parties, namely creditors and debtors to protect their interests in the event of a natural disaster. In this paper, we will discuss the legal protection for the parties whose objects of the Mortgage are destroyed due to natural disasters. The writing method used is a sociological juridical method (sociolegal research), which is to identify a legal issue from a social point of view. This writing then concludes that the destruction of the object of mortgage guarantee due to natural disasters is an overmacht condition or force majeure that is not explicitly regulated in the provisions of the UUHT. The destruction of the object of mortgage guarantee does not eliminate the debtor's obligations to the creditor. However, it requires the making of a re-agreement considering that the object of the guarantee as the object of the agreement has been destroyed. The agreement for the imposition of the Mortgage Rights becomes null and void because it does not meet the legal requirements of the agreement, and the destruction of the object of the Guaranteed Mortgage will cause the legal force of the Mortgage Certificate to be nullified. Keywords: Mortgage Certificate, Mortgage Object, Natural Disaster    INTISARI Peristiwa musnahnya tanah obyek Hak Tanggungan karena bencana alam yang merupakan force majeur atau overmacht yang terjadinya tidak dapat diduga ataupun dikendalikan oleh para pihak dalam perikatan Hak tanggungan belum diatur secara khusus dalam Undang-Undang Hak Tanggungan atau peraturan lainnya. Belum adanya aturan yang jelas mengenai musnahnya obyek hak tanggungan menyebabkan tidak adanya perlindungan hukum bagi para pihak yaitu kreditor dan debitur untuk melindungi kepentingannya apabila peristiwa bencana alam terjadi. Dalam penulisan ini akan di bahas mengenai perlindungan hukum terhadap para pihak apabila obyek Hak Tanggungan tersebut musnah karena bencana alam. Metode penulisan yang digunakan adalah metode yuridis sosiologis (sociolegal research) yaitu mengidentifikasi suatu persoalan hukum dari sudut pandang sosial. Penulisan ini kemudian mendapatkan kesimpulan bahwa Musnahnya obyek jaminan hak tanggungan dikarenakan bencana alam merupakan kondisi overmacht atau force majeur tidak diatur secara tegas dalam ketentuan UUHT. Musnahnya obyek jaminan hak tanggungan tidak menghilangkan kewajiban debitur terhadap kreditur. Namun memerlukan pembuatan perjanjian ulang mengingat obyek jaminan sebagai obyek perjanjian telah musnah maka perjanjian pembebanan Hak Tanggungan menjadi batal demi hukum dikarenakan tidak memenuhi syarat sah perjanjian, dan musnahnya objek jaminan Hak Tanggungan mengakibatkan kekuatan hukum sertipikat Hak Tanggungan tersebut menjadi hapus. Kata Kunci: Sertifikat Hak Tanggungan, Objek Hak Tanggungan, Bencana Alam
KEPEMILIKAN PROPERTI BAGI WARGA NEGARA ASING YANG BERKEDUDUKAN DI INDONESIA Dian Dewi Khasanah
PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum Vol 16 No 1 (2022): PROGRESIF : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bangka Belitung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33019/progresif.v16i1.2999

Abstract

In principle, only Indonesian citizens can own land in Indonesia. With the government's program to improve development and the Indonesian economy by promoting investment by bringing in foreign investors, the government issued a policy to regulate property ownership for foreign citizens who wish to own a residence in Indonesia. Property that can be owned by foreign nationals can only be owned with the status of Right to Use and Right to Rent for a certain period of time. The purpose of this limitation of the period of property ownership for foreign nationals is to protect land owned by Indonesian citizens from various exploitation and covert foreign domination. Ownership of property by foreign nationals is regulated in various laws and regulations and their implementing regulations. With the issuance of these various regulations, it is hoped that there will be harmonization between property ownership arrangements for foreign citizens and residential ownership for Indonesian citizens.