Ja'far Assagaf
UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Historiografi Hadis: Analis Embrio, Pemetaan dan Perkembangannya Ja'far Assagaf
Substantia: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin Vol 24, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Filsafat UIN Ar-raniry Banda Aceh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/substantia.v24i1.12978

Abstract

This article examines the historiography of hadith from the beginning of its emergence, then it becomes a separate form in the study of Islamic history. This study uses a descriptive qualitative approach with a content analysis method to find three parts of hadith historiography, namely: embryo, mapping, and development. This study concludes that the embryo of the historiographical emergence of hadith is a historical reality that was real at the time it was reported, and the historical reality of the existence of written works in the second-century hijrah. Both are sources that are interrelated and cannot be separated. At the source mapping level, hadith historiography obtains biographical information on rijal al-hadith from the books al-Sirah, al-Tarikh, al-Thabaqah, and al-Manaqib even though these books are also sources of Islamic historiography. Another further finding is that the development of modern hadith historiography is more on the historical trajectory of hadith with several forms that still revolve around classical hadith issues. Social, political, and other approaches can function as integration in hadith historiography so that they can examine the development of hadith in modern society. Abstrak:  Artikel ini mengkaji historiografi hadis dari awal kemunculannya sebagai embrio, kemudian menjadi bentuk tersendiri dari jenis kitab dalam kajian sejarah Islam. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif dengan metode analisis isi untuk menemukan tiga bagian historiografi hadis yakni: embrio, pemetaan, dan pengembangan. Kajian ini menemukan bahwa embrio kemunculan historiografis hadis adalah realitas sejarah yang nyata pada saat diberitakan, dan realitas sejarah keberadaan karya tulis pada abad kedua hijriyah. Keduanya merupakan sumber yang saling berkaitan dan tidak dapat dipisahkan. Pada pemetaan sumber, historiografi hadis memperoleh informasi biografi rijal al-hadits dari kitab-kitab al-Sirah, al-Tarikh, al-Thabaqah, dan al-Manaqib meskipun kitab-kitab tersebut juga merupakan sumber historiografi Islam. Temuan lain selanjutnya adalah perkembangan historiografi hadis modern lebih pada lintasan sejarah hadis dengan beberapa bentuk yang masih berkisar pada persoalan hadis klasik. Pendekatan sosial, politik dan lainnya dapat berfungsi sebagai integrasi dalam historiografi hadis yang mampu mengkaji perkembangan hadis dalam masyarakat modern, media sosial, dan lain-lain.
The Genealogy of Hadith Criticism Methods in Western Scholarship Imam Sahal Ramdhani; Al Makin; Ja'far Assagaf
ESENSIA: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin Vol. 26 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/esensia.v26i2.7799

Abstract

The historicity of hadith is a prominent topic in debates concerning hadith criticism methods within Western hadith scholarship. The issue lies in the fact that the methods developed by Western revisionist hadith scholars, primarily based on the written tradition, tend to marginalize sources of hadith historicity grounded in the oral tradition. Consequently, Western revisionist hadith scholarship often provides an unbalanced justification and generalization of hadith historiography. Addressing this concern, this article employs a genealogical approach alongside Michel Foucault’s theory of power relations in knowledge to trace, examine, and evaluate the methods of hadith criticism that have emerged within Western scholarship. The findings of this research are as follows: first, the methods of hadith criticism developed by Western revisionist scholars are founded upon a Eurocentric paradigm that dominates and exerts hegemony over the history of hadith. This paradigm centers on the primacy of the written tradition’s validity. Second, the methods developed by the revisionist group are ultimately rooted in a network of knowledge-power, which is interconnected and exerts hegemonic control over the discourse