Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada
Marcus Priyo Gunarto
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
ASAS KESEIMBANGAN DALAM KONSEP RANCANGAN UNDANG-UNDANG KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PIDANA Marcus Priyo Gunarto
Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 24, No 1 (2012)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (368.666 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jmh.16143

Abstract

Criminal law reform by replacing the old penal code is intended to ensure that the applicable criminal law is consistent with the value of Indonesian nation. Therefore, review and re-establishment of criminal law that is based on the central Indonesian values of socio-political, socio-philosophical, and sociocultural must be conducted. In accordance with the Indonesian nation’s character who put individual and social interest in an equilibrium, a monodualistic balance must be the foundation of the concept of criminal action, criminal responsibility, and punishment. Pembaharuan hukum pidana dengan mengganti KUHP yang lama dengan KUHP yang baru dimaksudkan agar hukum pidana yang berlaku sesuai dengan sistem nilai yang dianut oleh bangsa Indonesia. Sehubungan dengan hal tersebut, pembaharuan hukum pidana dilakukan peninjauan dan pembentukan kembali hukum pidana yang sesuai dengan nilai-nilai sentral sosio-politik, sosio-filosofik, dan nilai-nilai sosio-kultural masyarakat Indonesia. Sesuai dengan karakter bangsa Indonesia yang menempatkan kepentingan individu dan kepentingan sosial secara berimbang, maka keseimbangan monodualis mendasari pengaturan tentang perbuatan pidana, pertanggungjawaban, pidana dan pemidanaan.
Sikap Memidana yang Berorientasi pada Tujuan Pemidanaan Marcus Priyo Gunarto
Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 21, No 1 (2009)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (393.063 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jmh.16248

Abstract

Punitive attitudes of law enforcers in some criminal cases seem not to benefit the convict, as it does not support the main objective of the criminal justice system. This is because of the absence of binding direction which guides judges in making judgments. In order to benefit the convict, criminal law should formulate a binding direction as well as individualizing punishment which bind all the criminal court. Moreover, there should also be a common understanding among law enforcers that punitive attitude should be balanced with curing attitude. Therefore, physical, substantial and cultural synchronization are needed. The physical synchronization can be conducted through synergy among law enforcers as part of the criminal justice system. The substantial synchronization can be realized through the availability of common understanding among law enforces.
Mengembalikan Pelaksanaan Peninjauan Kembali Sesuai Asas Hukum Marcus Priyo Gunarto
Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 21, No 3 (2009)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (399.287 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jmh.16273

Abstract

This study analyzes the inconsistency of the Supreme Court when trying review appeals. Once, it turned down prosecuting attorney’s appeal because Article 263 KUHAP only recognizes the defendants or their inheri­tors to file such request. However in another ruling, the Court granted the appeal ‘for the sake of public interest’.  Studi ini mencermati ketidakkonsistenan Mahkamah Agung dalam mengadili pen­injauan kembali. Dalam satu perkara, Mahkamah menolak permohonan penin­jauan kembali dari jaksa karena Pasal 263 KUHAP membatasi hanya terpidana atau ahli warisnya saja sebagai pihak yang dapat memohon peninjauan kembali. Namun dalam perkara lain, Mahkamah mengabul­kan permohonan jaksa demi ‘melindungi kepentingan umum’.
Co-Authors