Radhyca Nanda
Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PERLINDUNGAN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI KONSUMEN TERHADAP IKLAN TELEVISI YANG BERMUATAN MATERI PORNOGRAFI MELALUI CLASS ACTION Radhyca Nanda
Dialogia Iuridica Vol. 11 No. 1 (2019): Volume 11 Nomor 1 Tahun 2019
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Maranatha Christian University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (311.646 KB) | DOI: 10.28932/di.v11i1.1551

Abstract

Advertising is a medium of communication directly with producers (business actors) to the audience / prospective consumers and consumers, of course here is expected by producers, one of which introduces products (both goods and services) to consumers and hopes consumers, through persuasion, are willing to consume them. Through advertisements, business actors refer to something related to their products to consumers. Because business people take various ways that are considered to be able to convey their messages effectively and efficiently. Business actors also choose media that are considered more appropriate for that. Reflecting on the educational background, social status, culture, ethnicity, religion, and others from the target consumers also influences the strategies of business people to advertise their products. Considering the loss caused by the broadcasting of advertisements has a massive impact and is felt by many consumers, which of course is not small, and has the same importance due to the losses suffered, consumers are more right to restore their rights to file a group representation as adopted in the Indonesian legal system Perma Nomor 1 Tahun 2002 Tentang Acara Gugatan Perwakilan Kelompok Keywords : Advertising; Businessmen; And Consumer.
MENAKAR KEWAJIBAN PENGGUNAAN BAHASA INDONESIA PADA MEREK DAGANG Muh. Ali Masnun; Radhyca Nanda; Dilla Nurfiana Astanti
Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 32, No 3 (2020)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jmh.55970

Abstract

AbstractThis study aims to analyze the obligation to use Indonesian in trademarks. The analysis of these problems uses normative juridical research supported by primary and secondary legal materials. Based on the analysis, the obligation to use Indonesian on trademarks cannot be fully applied for several reasons. First, that the provision has not been accommodated in the 2016 Trademark Law which has classified trademarks and services. Secondly, the specificity of the regulation, the provisions stipulated in the 2016 Trademark Law are more specifically related to trademark protection than the Flag and Language Law. Third, related to the implementation and law enforcement that do not yet support these obligations.IntisariPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kewajiban penggunaan bahasa Indonesia pada merek dagang. Analisis atas problematika tersebut menggunakan penelitian yuridis normatif dengan didukung bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Berdasarkan analisis, kewajiban penggunaan bahasa Indonesia pada merek dagang belum sepenuhnya dapat diterapkan dengan beberapa alasan. Pertama, bahwa ketentuan tersebut belum mengakomodir dalam UU Merek 2016 yang sudah mengklasifikasikan merek dagang dan jasa. Kedua, aspek kekhususan pengaturan, ketentuan yang diatur dalam UU Merek 2016 lebih khusus mengatur terkait perlindungan merek daripada UU Bendera dan Bahasa. Ketiga, berkaitan dengan implementasi dan penegakan hukumnya yang belum mendukung kewajiban tersebut.