Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal REUSAM ; Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Hakam : Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam dan Hukum Ekonomi Islam
A. Malthuf Siroj
Universitas Nurul Jadid
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga (KDRT) Perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2004 dan Hukum Islam A. Malthuf Siroj
JURNAL HAKAM Vol 4, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Keluarga Fakultas Agama Islam Universitas Nurul Jadid

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (546.331 KB) | DOI: 10.33650/jhi.v4i2.1638

Abstract

Cases of domestic violence often occur in society and has become a very complex social problem. From year to year this case rapidly growing both quantitatively and qualitatively. Because of that,  Act No. 23 of 2004 comes to resolving  the cases of domestic violence , in addition to other laws related. Domestic violence includes any act that causes misery and suffering due mainly to women's physical, psychological, sexual or neglect of household. But according to Islamic law, wife beating because of nusyuz or children who were aged 10 years and still leave the obligatory prayers is not included in the category of domestic violence because this kind of action aimed educative. The domestic violence according to the school of Bio-sociological (school of Convergence) occurs due to internal factors (innate character, psychological) and external factors (environmental sociological) that encourage acts of violence. According to Islam, a violent action is mainly due to the weakness of the practice of religious values in family life, because in principle the humankinds were  born early  in a state of purity and after that their personality is determined by the mode of education and the dynamics of the environment surrounding them. To cope with domestic violence do efforts pre-emptive, preventive and repressive. The repressive effort was the last attempt to do after other efforts did not succeed. According to Islamic law when there has been a sign of disharmony (syiqaq) between the spouses, the settlement must be internally first by involving two mediators (hakamain) of each family of husband and wife. If this kind of settlement efforts are not successful then the solution that can be taken is talaq (divorce) to avoid more fatal  consequences. For the perpetrators of domestic violence Act No. 23 of 2004 provides a penalty of imprisonment or fines and additional penalty, while according to Islamic law, these violent acts, including category jarimah qisas-diyat or ta'zir depending on mode of action and the consequences thereof. Keywords: Violence, Domestic, Act No. 23 of 2004, Islamic Law.
PROBLEM PENEGAKAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA DI INDONESIA A. Malthuf Siroj
JURNAL HAKAM Vol 4, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Keluarga Fakultas Agama Islam Universitas Nurul Jadid

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (352.219 KB) | DOI: 10.33650/jhi.v4i1.1368

Abstract

The issue of human rights enforcement has always been an interesting spotlight in the public, including in Indonesia. This is because the existence of human rights is always attached to every human being. Besides that, guarantee and protection of human rights is also one of the benchmarks for the nation and state progress. The presence of this research is also inseparable from the efforts to answer various problems of human rights enforcement in Indonesia, which have so far been considered badly by Human Rights Watch (HRW) in the 2020 word report, especially for vulnerable groups. Therefore, this research not only presents a detailed description of the theoretical aspects of human rights itself, but also describes in detail the important instruments for human rights enforcement, various problems in enforcing human rights in Indonesia, as well as some important solutions that needs to be implemented immediately in the practice of human rights enforcement so that the manifestation of substantive truth and justice is truly felt by all levels of Indonesian society.Keywords: Human Rights Enforcement, Human Rights Problems, Human Rights Enforcement Solutions
PENEGAKAN HUKUM PROGRESIF: UPAYA MEWUJUDKAN KEADILAN SUBSTANTIF H.A Malthuf Siroj; Ismail Marzuki
JURNAL HAKAM Vol 1, No 2 (2017): Desember
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Keluarga Fakultas Agama Islam Universitas Nurul Jadid

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (172.252 KB) | DOI: 10.33650/jhi.v1i2.76

Abstract

Law enforcement that often miseries and hurts the sense of community justice encourages one of the jurists, Satjipto Rahardjo expresses his idea about the need to involve conscience and morals in punishment. This way of punishment is then referred to as progressive law enforcement. Progressive law is a scientific endeavor that criticizes conventional punishment mechanisms; namely punish by putting forward the legal-formal truth, which is the cause of law enforcement in this country cannot give happiness to the seekers of justice. The progressive legal orientation is how to ground the truth (substantive justice), based on the premise that law is for man, not on the contrary. In addition, progressive legal notion holds that the truth of the law is not always judged from the application of laws formulated in the law, but the extent to which the law responds to developments in society. To that end, when the law is stuck in answering the community's problem, then here is the need to make a breakthrough (rule breaking). This shows that progressive law enforcement is an effort / process that always seeks truth and justice.Keywords: Law Enforcement, Progressive Law, Substantive Justice
PEMAKSAAN PERKAWINAN DALAM KONTEKS KAJIAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA DAN UNDANG-UNDANG TINDAK PIDANA KEKERASAN SEKSUAL Ismail Marzuki; A Malthuf Siroj
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Reusam Vol 10, No 2 (2022): REUSAM: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum - November 2022
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Malikussaleh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29103/reusam.v10i2.10444

Abstract

Penelitian ini berusaha untuk mengkaji hakikat perkawinan paksa dalam berbagai paradigma, khususnya paradigma Hak Asasi Manusia dan Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual. Hal ini karena praktek perkawinan paksa masih marak terjadi di masyarakat, baik atas nama tradisi maupun ajaran agama tertentu. Metode penelitian yang digunakan ialah metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan menelusuri dan menganalisa berbagai peraturan, teori dan pandangan dari para ahli hukum yang relevan dengan objek penelitian ini yakni pemaksaan perkawinan. Adapun hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dalam perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia, pemaksaan perkawinan bertentangan dengan prinsip dan nilai kemanusiaan yang diakui dalam sistem hukum nasional dan internasional, khususnya dalam Pasal 10 UU Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 dan Convention on Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Againts Women (CEDAW) yang menyatakan bahwa perempuan memiliki hak yang sama dengan laki-laki untuk memasuki jenjang perkawinan dan memilih pasangan dengan persetujuan secara bebas dan sepenuhnya. Sedangkan dalam perspektif UU Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual, pemaksaan perkawinan merupakan salah satu jenis delik kekerasan seksual, sehingga terhadap pelaku dapat dikenakan sanksi pidana sesuai dengan Pasal 10 UU Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual.
Co-Authors Marzuki, Ismail