Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi Amsir Law Jurnal (ALJ)
Puspita Nirmala
Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Univeristas Yapis Papua
Computer Science & IT Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
REKONSTRUKSI SISTEM BIROKRASI PERTANAHAN MENUJU KONSEP KEADILAN DALAM KERANGKA POLITIK HUKUM AGRARIA: TINJAUAN TERHADAP IMPLEMENTASI KETETAPAN MPR RI NO. IX/MPR/2001 Nirmala, Puspita
Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi Vol 3, No 11 (2013)
Publisher : Universitas Yapis Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

AbstrakSetiap orang yang berurusan dengan birokrasi harus diperlakukan dengan sama pentingnya. Arah baru atau model reformasi sistem birokrasi dan pelayanan publik Badan Pertanahan Nasional perlu dirancang untuk mendukung demokratisasi dan terbentuknya clean and good governance yaitu tumbuhnya pemerintahan yang rasional, transparansi, dan memiliki sikap kompetisi antar departemen dalam memberikan pelayanan, mendorong tegaknya hukum serta memberikan pertanggungjawaban terhadap publik (public accountibility) secara teratur. Untuk itu maka pembaruan sistem hukum agraria harus dilaksanakan sesuai dengan prinsip-prinsip : diantaranya mensejahterakan rakyat, terutama melalui peningkatan kualitas sumberdaya manusia Indonesia, mewujudkan keadilan dalam penguasaan, pemilikan, penggunaan, pemanfaatan, dan pemeliharaan sumberdaya agraria, mengakui dan menghormati hak masyarakat hukum adat dan keragaman budaya bangsa atas sumberdaya agraria
Adversary System in Common Law Countries and Possibility for Implementation in Indonesian Court Nirmala, Puspita
Amsir Law Journal Vol 2 No 1 (2020): Oktober
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Bisnis Andi Sapada.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36746/alj.v2i1.28

Abstract

This research tries to open the possibility of implementing an adversary system which is very closely related to the common law system in Indonesia, especially concerning the “The Rights of the Accused” in the criminal justice process. This research is carried out normatively by conducting legal studies through literature and legislation. The result of this research is that if the accused declared himself guilty of the crime he committed, this means that the accused will lose his right to be tried and processed fairly trial in the common law system. If a defendant is declared guilty, then the next process is the conviction without trial, in which case there are weaknesses in the rights of the accused that should have been carried out through a jury trial. Is it possible to apply in Indonesian courts? Is it not contrary to the norms contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure (KUHAP), especially regarding the rights of suspects relating to human rights (HAM), such as equal treatment before the law; put forward the presumption of innocence; the right to compensation; right to legal assistance; the defendant's rights before the court; a free, fast and simple trial; and a court that is open to the public. However, if possible in Indonesia to switch to the adversary system, the judge's role can be limited only as a referee to allow the creation of a fair trial. The party in charge of deciding whether or not the defendant is right is the jury.
Co-Authors