Sutapa Mulja Widada
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

PROBLEMATIKA PEMILIHAN UMUM KEPALA DAERAH (PEMILUKADA) DI SURAKARTA TAHUN 2010 Sutapa Mulja Widada
Journal of Law, Society, and Islamic Civilization Vol 1, No 1: April 2013
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jolsic.v1i1.50126

Abstract

The results of research show that the regional election in Surakarta Year 2010 can run smoothly with parameters: administrative electoral success, political success and the electoral success of quality products. Nevertheless, there is still the problem of including the establishment Supervisory Committee, the organizing body Formation (PPK, PPS, and KPPS), budget Election, Data and Designation Update Voters List (DP4), Campaign, Regional Head General Election Regulations. Election classic problem of money politics going on with the modus operandi of money politics is varied, while the money politics. Election regulations contained in Article 82 paragraph ( 1 ) and ( 2 ) of Act No. 32 of 2004 are legal loopholes of the legal aspects of the subject of money politics just a couple of candidates and/or the campaign team and aspects of legal sanctions no deterrent effect . Article 117 paragraph ( 2 ) of Act No. 32 of 2004 just threatened with imprisonment ' a minimum of 2 ( two ) months and a maximum of 12 (twelve ) months and / or a fine of Rp . 1,000,000.00 ( one million rupiah ) and maximum Rp . 10,000,000.00 ( ten million dollars ).
PEMBERDAYAAN LOCAL WISDOM DALAM PENYELESAIAN KONFLIK DI KERATON SURAKARTA HADININGRAT Sutapa Mulja Widada; Istadiyantha Istadiyantha
Journal of Law, Society, and Islamic Civilization Vol 3, No 2: Oktober 2015
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jolsic.v3i2.50356

Abstract

Empowerment of local wisdom in conflict resolution must start with the Surakarta palace parse the source of major problems of conflict twin kings of Surakarta triggered by disputes between Kanjeng Gusti Pangeran Harya (KGPH) Hangabehi and KGPH Tedjowulan born from different mothers .The dispute about the heir to the throne of King Keraton Surakarta. In the case resolve any conflicts that occur in both conflicts over the Surakarta palace of King Twins or King palace with the Institute for Traditional Council still uses paugeran or values of the customary laws (local wisdom) in the palace . Thus, the integration values of local wisdom in the form of customary law functioned exclusively as an instrument of conflict resolution that reflects the culture of Javanese palace noble palace as well as protecting cultural heritage.
EFEKTIVITAS USIA 17 TAHUN PADA SIM C GUNA MENGURANGI KECELAKAAN LALU LINTAS SURAKARTA Uce Ade Wibowo; Sutapa Mulja Widada
Journal of Law, Society, and Islamic Civilization Vol 1, No 2: Oktober 2013
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jolsic.v1i2.50163

Abstract

The objecetive of research was to describe for find out about efectiveness of Article 81 Verse (2) Letter a of Act Number 22 of 2009 concern age requisite to get SIM C. Then, which factors can influence efectiveness of Article 81 Verse (2) Letter a of Act Number 22 of 2009. And, which effort can do for decrease traffic accident at teenager.This study belonged to an emperical law reserch that was descriptive in nature. Primary data was from observation and interview result. Secondary data was from library study on law, archive, and other document relevant to the research studied. Techniques of collecting data used were document, observation, and interview.Based on result of research that Article 81 condition 17th old, to age 20th old, then establish which independent institute for handle safety riding and traffic accident problem at teenager. Verse (2) Letter a of Act Number 22 of 2009, not effective for decrease traffic accident in Surakarta. Factor causing are legislation; upholder of the law; Facilitiy of uphold law; society; and culture. Effort for decrease traffic accident are increase from age