Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PERTARUNGAN SIMBOL KOMUNIKASI POLITIK DALAM PILKADA KABUPATEN LOMBOK UTARA MUHAMMAD SYAOKI; MUHAMMAD FIKRI
TASÂMUH Vol. 18 No. 2 (2020): DAKWAH DAN MODERNISASI
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (328.763 KB) | DOI: 10.20414/tasamuh.v18i2.2785

Abstract

Regional election (Pilkada) is a stage for each candidate to attract public attention. The process is carried out in various ways. This includes the use of symbols. This study seeks to see the use of symbols as a political communication strategy in the Regional election of Lombok Utara Regency. The results of this study indicate that the regent candidates who are competing in the election of Lombok Utara Regency (KLU) use various symbols to attract the attention of voters. These include the use of taglines, gestures, and political attributes such as the words SANGGUP, S14P, fist, and respect. Symbol warfare is also carried out in the use of attributes attached to ballot photos. Apart from being aimed at attracting voters' interest, this symbol war is also used as a political communication strategy so that it is easy to remember in the election process.
KHILAFATISM IN ISLAM: THE CONCEPT OF THE KHILAFAH IN THE VIEW OF HIZBU TAHRIR AND AHMADIYAH Muhammad Syaoki
Politea : Jurnal Politik Islam Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021): Politik Islam, Demokrasi Desa dan Kebebasan Berfikir di Masa Pandemi
Publisher : UIN Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20414/politea.v4i2.4263

Abstract

After the collapse of the Ottoman dynasty in Turkey, khilafatism became a prolongedpolemic in the Islamic world. This polemic gave rise to various movements includingHizb ut-Tahrir which emerged in Palestine and the Ahmadiyya which emerged in India.This research is a type of literature study using qualitative methods. The results of thisstudy indicate that although these two movements have completely different theologicalviews, they both carry the idea of a caliphate even though in practice these twomovements have different fighting directions. Khilafatism in Ahmadiyah has beenrunning for a long time and survived, while khilafatism in HT is still a kind of utopiabecause until now there has not been a single region that has implemented a caliphatesystem, especially in Indonesia after the establishment of HTI as a banned massorganization.