Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL ILMIAH SIMANTEK
NIA T. SILALAHI
UNIVERSITAS HKBP NOMMENSEN
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
ANALISIS TINGKAT KOGNITIF SOAL GERAK MELINGKAR BERATURAN DALAM BUKU SMA KELAS X BERDASARKAN TAKSONOMI BLOOM MUKTAR B. PANJAITAN; NIA T. SILALAHI
JURNAL ILMIAH SIMANTEK Vol 6 No 1 (2022): JURNAL ILMIAH SIMANTEK
Publisher : LP2MTBM MAKARIOZ

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the percentage of cognitive level distribution on the subject of Regular Circular Motion, threephysics books for class X 2013 curriculum based on Bloom's Taxonomy. This type of research was descriptive qualitativeresearch, and the objects used were three physics books of senior high school students at Class X with Curriculum 2013.The research data was the cognitive level of the questions contained in the book on the subject of Regular Circular Motion.The data analysis in this study was a qualitative descriptive analysis of the data from the validation results and data on thesuitability of the book. Based on the results of research and discussion on the cognitive level of the subject matter of RegularCircular Motion in three physics books of senior high school students at Class X with Curriculum 2013, it was found that thecomparison of the difficulty levels of easy questions (C1-C2), medium questions (C3-C4), and difficult questions (C1-C2) C5-C6) namely: 1). Book I by 6%:84%:10%; 2). Book II of 0%; 84.85%; 15.15%; 3). Book III of 20.93%; 72.1%; 6.98%. From thiscomparison, it can be concluded that the cognitive level in the three physics books studied was not proportional.
Co-Authors PANJAITAN, MUKTAR B