Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.463
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Res Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Indonesian Journal of Innovation Studies IJLRSA
Suhardi Somomoeljono
Universitas Mathla'ul Anwar Banten
Humanities Computer Science & IT Education Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 8 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 8 Documents
Search

 1 
PEMBATALAN SERTIFIKAT TANAH DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM AGRARIA DAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI Suhardi Somomoeljono
Res Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 1 No. 2 (2021): Jurnal Res Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Bina Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46306/rj.v1i2.11

Abstract

 Hak atas tanah perlu untuk di daftarkan kepada instansi berwenang melalui mekanisme pendaftaran tanah karena akan dianggap timbul hak atas tanah tersebut pada saat dicatatkan pada buku tanah. Pendaftaran Tanah merupakan suatu kegiatan yang diselenggarakan pemerintahuntuk memberikan kepastian hukum kepada pemilik hak atas tanah. Pemilikan hak atas tanah tersebut dibuktikan dengan diterbitkannya sertipikat hak atas tanah sebagai alat pembuktian yang kuat. Namun, dewasa ini terdapat banyak terdapat permasalahan terkait pembatalan hak atas tanah yang telah terdaftar. Berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan, produk hukum yang dikeluarkan oleh instansi yang berwenang mengeluarkan produk hukum terkait hak atas tanah dapat dibatalkan apabila dianggap memiliki cacat administrasi atau dibatalkan pengadilan baik pengadilan tata usaha negara atau dianggap tidak memiliki kekuatan hukum berdasarkan pengadilan negeri. Lebih jauh, tindakan pejabat tata usaha negara dalam melaksanakannya kewenangannya untuk membatalkan produk hukum terkait hak atas tanah kerap dianggap sebagai penyelewengan kewenangan sehingga kerap terjadi persinggungan antara hukum pidana dan hukum administrasi negara pada proses pelaksanaannya. Tulisan ini akan membahas batasan tindakan pidana dan tindakan administrasi negara yang dilakukan aparatur sipil negara dalam melakukan pembatalan produk hukum terkait hak atas tanah
The Relevance of the Miranda Rule for the Protection of Human Rights in Law Enforcement in Indonesia Somomoeljono, Suhardi; Tiara Hardy, Maryzka
The International Journal of Law Review and State Administration Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): July-August : The International Journal of Law Review and State Administration
Publisher : PDPI (Perkumpulan Dosen Peneliti Indonesia)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58818/ijlrsa.v3i4.235

Abstract

This study explores the relevance of the Miranda Rule in protecting human rights within the context of law enforcement in Indonesia. The Miranda Rule, originating from the United States legal system, mandates that individuals taken into custody must be informed of their constitutional rights, including the right to remain silent and the right to legal counsel. Although Indonesia does not formally adopt the Miranda Rule, similar principles are embedded in its legal framework through the constitution and criminal procedure law. This research highlights the gaps in implementation and enforcement that often lead to human rights violations during arrest and interrogation processes. Using a normative legal approach and supported by case analysis, this paper argues that the integration of Miranda-like safeguards in Indonesian law enforcement practices can significantly strengthen the protection of suspects' rights and uphold due process. The study concludes that adopting procedural guarantees akin to the Miranda Rule is not only relevant but essential to aligning Indonesia's legal system with international human rights standards.
Legal Theory as the Foundation of Certainty, Justice, and Utility in the Indonesian Judicial System Suhardi, Somomoeljono
The International Journal of Law Review and State Administration Vol. 3 No. 5 (2025): September-October : The International Journal of Law Review and State Administr
Publisher : PDPI (Perkumpulan Dosen Peneliti Indonesia)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58818/ijlrsa.v3i5.248

Abstract

Legal theory plays a fundamental role in shaping both the intellectual framework and the practice of law enforcement in Indonesia. As a normative system, law is not only required to provide certainty but also to ensure justice and deliver practical utility for society. Legal certainty functions as the basis for consistent enforcement of rules, justice represents the moral goal of law, and utility emphasizes the law’s practical value in addressing social needs. This article examines legal theory as the primary foundation of Indonesia’s judicial system, highlighting the debate among legal positivism, natural law theory, and progressive law in achieving a balance between these three fundamental values. The study employs a normative approach with conceptual analysis of various schools of legal thought and their implementation in judicial practice. Findings reveal that the Indonesian judicial system continues to face challenges in harmonizing certainty, justice, and utility particularly in the context of law enforcement oriented toward substantive justice. Thus, reinterpretation and revitalization of legal theory are needed to make it more adaptive to societal developments, while maintaining the supremacy of law as an instrument of social justice.
Arbitration in the South China Sea: Legal and Geopolitical Ramifications: Arbitrase di Laut Cina Selatan: Konsekuensi Hukum dan Geopolitik Somomoeljono, Suhardi; Hardy, Jurisdito Hutomo
Indonesian Journal of Innovation Studies Vol. 24 (2023): October
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/ijins.v25i.958

Abstract

The present research scrutinizes the arbitration case between the Philippines and the People's Republic of China concerning the contested maritime zones in the South China Sea, a global hotspot for territorial disputes, rich natural resources, and strategic naval passages. Utilizing a normative legal research methodology coupled with a descriptive-analytical approach, this study carefully examines international legal frameworks, including UNCLOS, and draws upon a diverse range of data sources like legal documents, official statements, and scholarly literature to dissect the nuances of the South China Sea dispute. The findings reveal that the arbitration process, initiated by the Philippines in 2013 and culminating in a 2016 verdict favoring several of its claims, not only holds the promise to fortify international maritime law and foster regional stability but also underscores the critical role of diplomatic efforts in actualizing comprehensive solutions. Nonetheless, the endeavor is not without its pitfalls, notably the absence of stringent sanctions and implementation challenges. Furthermore, the arbitration verdict significantly influences the Philippines-PRC bilateral relations, affecting territorial claims and regional economies, while reaffirming UNCLOS's authority in governing international maritime conflicts. Therefore, the research advocates for sustained diplomatic initiatives and collaboration as a complementary pathway to arbitration, envisioning a harmonious resolution to the complex and multifaceted South China Sea dispute. Highlights: The arbitration case between the Philippines and the PRC reaffirmed the crucial role of UNCLOS in guiding international maritime disputes and fostering regional stability. Despite the potential to enhance international maritime law and prevent conflicts, the arbitration process faces challenges in terms of enforcing sanctions and ensuring comprehensive implementation. The arbitration verdict has deep-seated implications on Philippines-PRC bilateral relations, impacting territorial claims, economic prospects, and necessitating sustained diplomatic efforts for a more cohesive resolution to the South China Sea dispute. Keywords: South China Sea, International Arbitration, UNCLOS, Philippines-PRC Relations, Maritime Law.
Efforts to Build a Pancasila Economy: Making Nusantara Local Wisdom the Antithesis of Neo-Capitalism Suhardi Somomoeljono
The International Journal of Law Review and State Administration Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): May-June : The International Journal of Law Review and State Administration
Publisher : PDPI (Perkumpulan Dosen Peneliti Indonesia)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study explores the conceptual and structural efforts to build a New Paradigm of the Pancasila Economic System, positioning it as a direct, humane alternative to the destructive tendencies of Neo-Capitalism. Grounded in the constitutional mandate of the Fifth Sila (Social Justice for All Indonesian People), this paper argues that the modern formulation of Pancasila Economics must derive its core postulates from the rich soil of Nusantara's local wisdom. Using a qualitative-descriptive approach and conceptual-philosophical analysis, this research deconstructs the hyper-individualism and market tyranny of Neo-Capitalism, contrasting them with time-tested indigenous practices such as Gotong Royong (mutual cooperation), Musyawarah (deliberation), and localized ecological management frameworks like Subak and Sasi. The findings demonstrate that by structuring these communal values into a formal macroeconomic model, capital can be subjected to ethical, social, and spiritual boundaries, ensuring equitable wealth distribution over corporate greed. Furthermore, this study addresses the harsh reality of systemic domestic corruption, asserting that true nation-building demands unwavering academic resilience. Ultimately, this paper offers a rigorous conceptual framework that serves as an act of intellectual decolonization, proving that Indonesia's economic sovereignty lies in reclaiming its ancestral, egalitarian roots.
Corporate Criminal Liability in Procurement Activities within Corruption Offenses Suhardi Somomoeljono; Saurav Kumar
The International Journal of Law Review and State Administration Vol. 3 No. 6 (2025): November-Desember : The International Journal of Law Review and State Administr
Publisher : PDPI (Perkumpulan Dosen Peneliti Indonesia)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58818/ijlrsa.v3i6.272

Abstract

This study analyzes the framework of corporate criminal liability in corruption offenses related to goods procurement. As corporations increasingly participate in public procurement processes, the potential for corrupt practices such as bribery, bid-rigging, collusion, and fraudulent documentation poses significant risks to the integrity of government contracting. This research examines the legal basis for holding corporations criminally accountable, including the criteria for attributing criminal acts to a corporate entity, forms of liability, and applicable sanctions under Indonesian anti-corruption law. The study also reviews relevant judicial decisions to assess how courts interpret and apply corporate liability in procurement-related corruption cases. The findings indicate that although corporate criminal liability is formally recognized, challenges persist in proving corporate intent, identifying responsible managerial roles, and ensuring consistent judicial interpretation. The study concludes that strengthening compliance systems, improving procurement oversight, and providing clearer regulatory guidelines are crucial to enhancing the effectiveness of corporate criminal liability in corruption cases involving goods procurement.
Bribery as a Form of Corruption: A Juridical Analysis and Judicial Practice Suhardi Somomoeljono; Saurav Kumar
The International Journal of Law Review and State Administration Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): January-February : The International Journal of Law Review and State Administra
Publisher : PDPI (Perkumpulan Dosen Peneliti Indonesia)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58818/ijlrsa.v4i1.273

Abstract

This study examines bribery as a specific form of corruption within the Indonesian legal framework, focusing on its juridical aspects and judicial practice. Bribery, as regulated in Law No. 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law No. 20 of 2001 on the Eradication of Corruption Crimes, constitutes a criminal act that undermines public trust, disrupts governmental integrity, and damages the state’s administrative functions. This research analyzes the legal elements of bribery, the scope of criminal liability, and the procedural mechanisms used in investigating and prosecuting bribery cases. Furthermore, the study reviews selected court decisions to evaluate judicial consistency, sentencing patterns, and the effectiveness of judicial reasoning in achieving deterrence. The findings indicate that, despite the existence of strong legal provisions, challenges remain in terms of proving intent, uncovering hidden transactional networks, and ensuring institutional independence in bribery cases. The study concludes that strengthening legal clarity, enhancing investigative capacity, and improving judicial transparency are crucial to increasing the effectiveness of law enforcement against bribery as a corruption offense.
Critical Analysis of the Nucleus–Plasma Scheme and Community Plasma from the Perspective of Community Economic Growth and Business Law Suhardi Somomoeljono
The International Journal of Law Review and State Administration Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): March-April : The International Journal of Law Review and State Administration
Publisher : PDPI (Perkumpulan Dosen Peneliti Indonesia)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58818/ijlrsa.v4i2.309

Abstract

The plantation sector, particularly palm oil plantations, is one of the strategic sectors in Indonesia's economic development. The policy of granting Plantation Business Licenses (IUP) and Land Cultivation Rights (HGU) to plantation companies is essentially accompanied by an obligation to develop community plasma plantations amounting to at least 20% of the total cultivated land area. However, in practice, the implementation of this community plasma policy has not fully provided a significant impact on improving the welfare of communities surrounding plantation areas. This study aims to critically examine the relationship between plantation companies as the nucleus and local communities as plasma from the perspective of community economic growth and business law. The research method used is a normative juridical approach with deductive-descriptive analysis of legal policies governing plantations and the management of community plasma schemes. The findings indicate that weak legal policies and the lack of optimal government supervision are the primary factors causing the ineffective implementation of community plasma obligations. Therefore, the establishment of a special institution with national authority, such as the National Authority Agency for Indonesian Plantation Plasma (BONPPI), is necessary to supervise, coordinate, and ensure the implementation of community plasma obligations in a fair and transparent manner. The existence of such an institution is expected to improve community welfare, strengthen people's economic empowerment, and support equitable national economic growth.
Co-Authors Hardy, Jurisdito Hutomo Saurav Kumar Tiara Hardy, Maryzka